https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81435
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3)
> I think it means that Andrew is a maintainer of the overall tree-ssa
> infrastructure. AFAIK, he has not done any work on the strlen optimizations
> in the file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81330
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> You're right, I didn't consider this case. When copying (strlen(s) + 1) or
> more bytes, d cannot point at the terminating NUL at (s + strlen(s)) because
> the co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91135
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Kolesa ---
The actual reason why the linkage fails without the flag, for anyone interested
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204125#c6
有各种发票可幵出电+微:13 7:644} 88837张【 有 】↓【3%-13%】【 増 】各【 发 】【 稙 】种【 票 】【 税 】真【 幵 】
如果你不想再收到该产品的推荐邮件, 请点击这里退订
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Or we can just decorate the sources with:
/* Disable warnings about misspelling built-in in GCC diagnostics. */
#if __GNUC__ >= 10
# pragma GCC diagnostic push
# pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wformat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91147
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91135
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148
Bug ID: 91148
Summary: PowerPC build gets several warnings due to
-Wformat-diag
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91148
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91147
Bug ID: 91147
Summary: strlen of conditional plus index in known range not
folded
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91146
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91144
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com
--- Comment #2 from Wilc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91139
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Richard G. ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Maybe your NFS servers time is different from the local build ones so make
> gets confused as to what is new? That said, I've never seen Bug-1 but I also
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91144
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
SPEC2000's GCC is known to have strict aliasing issues in it :).
Does adding -fno-strict-aliasing help?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90980
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Jul 11 19:09:37 2019
New Revision: 273416
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273416&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Add AVX512 unaligned intrinsics
__m512i _mm512_loadu_epi64(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48200
--- Comment #30 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Pick up this again...
Now __asm__(".symver a, b@@ver") is used for two different purposes:
1. Mark a function/object *definition* as the specified version.
2. "Import" a symbol (function/object) with the speci
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91146
Bug ID: 91146
Summary: -Werror=array-bounds if compile with
-fsanitize=address
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91145
Bug ID: 91145
Summary: ICE: in vect_build_slp_tree_2, at tree-vect-slp.c:1143
with -march=skylake-avx512 -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91144
Bug ID: 91144
Summary: [10 regiression] 176.gcc miscompare after r273294
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91135
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Kolesa ---
I don't know 100% *what* the kernel uses it for, I just know it does. If I
remove it, linking vmlinux fails (with thousands of undefined references) so it
seems to require that specific ABI for whatever reaso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91135
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
You still haven't said what the kernel uses it for, when, in what way.
It probably shouldn't. But, -mcall-* should not change whether __linux__
and friends are defined.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10 Regression] aarch64 |[9 Regression] aarch64 ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91143
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91135
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Kolesa ---
Yeah, I noticed as much while investigating this. Question is, should gcc
define it? Is it the kernel that is in the wrong here as I originally thought?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91135
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91124
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91112
--- Comment #2 from Харпалёв Иван ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> Please provide the code, not URLs (as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ requests).
gcc-8 shows bad "required from here" line number in error message when
compiles thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91143
Bug ID: 91143
Summary: Power VSX SIMD ABI design for libmvec
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91143
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91136
--- Comment #12 from Artur Koniński ---
Thanks for the quick feedback and the fix!
I've checked it so far only on the artificial case, but it seems to work as
expected :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91142
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51155
Shachar Shemesh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shachar at shemesh dot biz
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #12 from Per Dalgas Jakobsen ---
Created attachment 46591
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46591&action=edit
Added more combinations of bitfield sets.
Now includes all 8 combinations of zero/non-zero assignments t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #11 from Per Dalgas Jakobsen ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> (In reply to Per Dalgas Jakobsen from comment #9)
> > avr-gcc -O3 (and -Os, -O1, -O2):
> > sts 0x0064, r1 ; 0x800064
> > ldi r24, 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91136
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
Created attachment 46590
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46590&action=edit
Tentative fix
Another item in the series "how can this have worked for so long"...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Per Dalgas Jakobsen from comment #9)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> > Fixed on trunk sofar.
> >
> > Note the non-optimal code-gen probably was a side-effect of us making
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90756
--- Comment #20 from Mike Hommey ---
Note this also affects mips and presumably mips64 (except for the latter, the
code has a ifdef that disables inlining presumably because of this ICE)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91142
Bug ID: 91142
Summary: Incorrect aligned vector load instruction emitted
because of vinserti32x4 elision
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #9 from Per Dalgas Jakobsen ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> Fixed on trunk sofar.
>
> Note the non-optimal code-gen probably was a side-effect of us making
> three volatile accesses out of one. On x86 I now see
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137
--- Comment #5 from bin cheng ---
Will try to find some time this WE, sorry for delaying.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78314
Alex Bennée changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alex.bennee at linaro dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91136
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #9 from Eri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91136
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I think the issue is
>
> inv_expr 5: ((signed long) &d + 19600) - (signed long) &c
>
> I hope Bin can investigate this. In the end we can only fight the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91124
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 11 08:31:19 2019
New Revision: 273408
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273408&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/91124
* config/i386/i386-builtin-types.def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91124
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jul 11 08:31:51 2019
New Revision: 273409
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273409&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/91124
* config/i386/sse.md (sse2_cvtpd2dq): Cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91141
Bug ID: 91141
Summary: Can't use class members inside conditional noexcept
specifier
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61726
--- Comment #2 from Jordi Vilar ---
Any progress on this? This is still happenning in version 9.1. Both clang and
vc++ compile it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91028
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Like its companion (PR ipa/90720) and the new lto/alias-3 test, this still
FAILs
on both Solaris and Linux/x86_64 with -fno-use-linker-plugin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90720
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ---
The test still FAILs on both sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and i386-pc-solaris2.11.
It also FAILs on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to felix from comment #7)
> I made the feature closely mimic The Other Compiler's behaviour: only
> function built-ins are recognised. This includes generic functions like
> __builtin_add_overflo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91136
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91136
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91137
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91133
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.2
Summary|__linux__ not de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91124
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Both patches posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg00845.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg00847.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91139
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Maybe your NFS servers time is different from the local build ones so make gets
confused as to what is new? That said, I've never seen Bug-1 but I also
do not build with source on NFS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91124
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91140
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.0
Known to fail|10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91131
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 11 07:32:04 2019
New Revision: 273376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=273376&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-07-11 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/91131
* gim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91136
--- Comment #6 from Artur Koniński ---
Quick check shows the same issue is visible on 4.9.2.
Checking on 4.3.3 and 4.7.4 results in no crash, but it seems already passes
before delayed branch scheduling reorganize the blocks in critical area, so
65 matches
Mail list logo
