https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91034
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
Does it make a difference if you replace gmp 6.1.2 with a recent snapshot from
https://gmplib.org/download/snapshot/ ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91035
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
As far as I know I don't have access to an S/390 system. Anything you can do
to narrow down the problem would be helpful. Like, for example, which function
has the undefined reference?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #4)
> > > It seems that at least Thomas and Dominique believe that this ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71637
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47307
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91034
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Roberts ---
Created attachment 46535
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46535&action=edit
tmp-divrem_1.s file generated using m4 from divrem_1.asm in gmp/mpn
This is the gmp 6.1.2 version, from the gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91034
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Roberts ---
Building 9.1.0 with gmp 6.1.2 using "-v -save-temps" gives:
gcc -v -save-temps -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../gcc-9.1.0/gmp/mpn -I..
-D__GMP_WITHIN_GMP -I../../../gcc-9.1.0/gmp -DOPERATION_divrem_1 -DNO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91037
Bug ID: 91037
Summary: #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunused-macros"
ignored for doubly-defined macro with g++
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90924
--- Comment #3 from Ren Kimura ---
Hi. Sorry for late. I've just attached more simple one.
PoC file for this bug can be created easily, just generating ELF file and edit
e_shstrndx in ELF header file to 0.
Attached one is built from simple Hell
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90924
--- Comment #2 from Ren Kimura ---
Created attachment 46534
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46534&action=edit
Proof of Concept ELF binary for nm command (Purified)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90393
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91032
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91036
Bug ID: 91036
Summary: GCC option -mno-dspr2 blocks the use of dsp r1
instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91035
Bug ID: 91035
Summary: [10 Regression] gotools fails to build on
s390x-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91034
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Roberts ---
Configure line used for building gcc 9.1.0:
../gcc-9.1.0/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-9.1.0--program-suffix=
--disa
ble-werror --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix
--enable-checking=release
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91030
--- Comment #20 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #18)
> For GPFS, the striping unit is 16M. The 8K buffer size chosen by GFortran
> is a huge performance sink. We have confirmed this with testing.
Could you share
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91034
Bug ID: 91034
Summary: In tree build of gmp fails on Raspberry Pi4 (ARM
Cortex A72) with `mls r1,r4,r8,r11' not supported in
ARM mode
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91030
--- Comment #19 from David Edelsohn ---
IBM XLF provides an XLFRTEOPTS environment variable, which includes control
over buffer size. The documentation makes it clear that XLF uses the block
size of the device by default:
buffer_size=size
Speci
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91030
--- Comment #18 from David Edelsohn ---
For GPFS, the striping unit is 16M. The 8K buffer size chosen by GFortran is a
huge performance sink. We have confirmed this with testing.
The recommendation from GPFS is that one should query the filesys
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91033
Bug ID: 91033
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in vect_analyze_loop, at
tree-vect-loop.c:2416
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91030
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #16)
> libgfortran unix.c:raw_write() will access the WRITE system call with up to
> 2GB of data, which the testcase is using for the native format.
>
> Should libgf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81787
Piotr Henryk Dabrowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||phd at phd dot re
--- Comment #
22 matches
Mail list logo