[Bug rtl-optimization/90756] g++ ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:218 on i686 and s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90756 --- Comment #4 from Mike Hommey --- Also note it does *not* happen on i686 when SSE is enabled.

[Bug rtl-optimization/90756] g++ ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:218 on i686 and s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90756 Mike Hommey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mh+gcc at glandium dot org --- Comment #3

[Bug debug/47819] [meta-bug] LTO debug information issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47819 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug middle-end/23409] [meta-bug] data dependence analyzer (BAD vs. BOP)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23409 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug driver/90983] manual documents `-Wno-stack-usage` flag, but it is unrecognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90983 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/90989] incorrrect strlen result after second strcpy into the same destination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90989 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug tree-optimization/90989] incorrrect strlen result after second strcpy into the same destination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90989 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/90989] New: incorrrect strlen result after second strcpy into the same destination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90989 Bug ID: 90989 Summary: incorrrect strlen result after second strcpy into the same destination Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/90944] combine debug file created when it shouldn't be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90944 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- That is moving over to statistics_counter_event instead of manually printing out things. Something like (NOTE this is not tested; just written on the fly and there might be better ways of counting when combi

[Bug debug/90944] combine debug file created when it shouldn't be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90944 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #2) > The following fixes the issue. Does anyone have a better suggestion? Well besides to change combine over to the new statistics.h infastructure; no?

[Bug debug/90944] combine debug file created when it shouldn't be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90944 --- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner --- The following fixes the issue. Does anyone have a better suggestion? Index: combine.c === --- combine.c (revision 272620) +++ combine.c (w

[Bug fortran/90988] New: Wrong error message with variables named "PUBLIC*"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90988 Bug ID: 90988 Summary: Wrong error message with variables named "PUBLIC*" Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/90987] New: Wrong error message with variables named "COMMON*"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90987 Bug ID: 90987 Summary: Wrong error message with variables named "COMMON*" Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/90813] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 fails (SIGSEGV) after 272084

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug fortran/90986] New: Wrong error message with variables named "EQUIVALENCE*"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90986 Bug ID: 90986 Summary: Wrong error message with variables named "EQUIVALENCE*" Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug fortran/90985] New: Wrong error message with variables named "DATA*"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90985 Bug ID: 90985 Summary: Wrong error message with variables named "DATA*" Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: f

[Bug rtl-optimization/90813] [10 regression] gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_51.f90 fails (SIGSEGV) after 272084

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90813 --- Comment #18 from Segher Boessenkool --- -mno-power8-fusion seems to fix this. Can you confirm?

[Bug target/90984] PowerPC cast from vector unsigned long long to vector double does not do an integer to float conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90984 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/90984] PowerPC cast from vector unsigned long long to vector double does not do an integer to float conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90984 --- Comment #2 from Shawn Landden --- It is also quite possible that this can't be changed now, because it could break working programs.

[Bug target/90984] PowerPC cast from vector unsigned long long to vector double does not do an integer to float conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90984 --- Comment #1 from Shawn Landden --- Also, how do I do a integer-to-float conversion to work around this bug?

[Bug target/90984] New: PowerPC cast from vector unsigned long long to vector double does not do an integer to float conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90984 Bug ID: 90984 Summary: PowerPC cast from vector unsigned long long to vector double does not do an integer to float conversion Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCON

[Bug driver/90983] manual documents `-Wno-stack-usage` flag, but it is unrecognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90983 --- Comment #1 from Cody Schafer --- It appears that commit 8e18705e1fb8213834b09c91c3ed7b15c8540d59 Author: msebor Date: Fri Jul 20 20:51:20 2018 + PR middle-end/82063 - issues with arguments enabled by -Wall Might be the change i

[Bug middle-end/90963] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90963 --- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2019-06-24 12:59 p.m., wilco at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Looking into this, pa.md is one of a few targets which defines > builtin_longjmp. > This subtracts 8 from the loaded frame pointer, bu

[Bug driver/90983] New: manual documents `-Wno-stack-usage` flag, but it is unrecognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90983 Bug ID: 90983 Summary: manual documents `-Wno-stack-usage` flag, but it is unrecognized Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/90963] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90963 --- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2019-06-24 12:59 p.m., wilco at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > I can commit this if you like or do you want to test it first? I'll test first. Thanks.

[Bug c++/90981] [9/10 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:31644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90981 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/90978] A suspicious code in df-scan.c since r160348

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90978 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- > Guess this is https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg00410.html but the > gcc_unreachable () calls weren't in the patch posted to gcc-patches. It indeed seems like debugging session leftover. Given we

[Bug middle-end/90982] [9/10 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1344

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90982 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Priority|P3

[Bug target/90972] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90972 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Summary|[9/10 Regression]

[Bug target/90972] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90972 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 24 17:21:40 2019 New Revision: 272623 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272623&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-24 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/90972

[Bug tree-optimization/90316] [8/9 Regression] large compile time increase in opt / alias stmt walking for Go example

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90316 --- Comment #41 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 24 17:19:36 2019 New Revision: 272622 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272622&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-24 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/90930

[Bug tree-optimization/90930] Excessive memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90930 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 24 17:19:36 2019 New Revision: 272622 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272622&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-24 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/90930

[Bug tree-optimization/90930] Excessive memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90930 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 24 17:17:26 2019 New Revision: 272621 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272621&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-24 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/90930

[Bug tree-optimization/90316] [8/9 Regression] large compile time increase in opt / alias stmt walking for Go example

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90316 --- Comment #40 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 24 17:17:26 2019 New Revision: 272621 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272621&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-06-24 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/90930

[Bug middle-end/90963] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90963 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/90939] ICE in meet_with, at ipa-cp.c:1073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90939 --- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor --- I proposed a patch in the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-06/msg01479.html

[Bug tree-optimization/90879] fold zero-equality of strcmp between a longer string and a smaller array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90879 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug c++/90982] New: [9/10 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1344

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90982 Bug ID: 90982 Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1344 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/90981] New: [9/10 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:31644

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90981 Bug ID: 90981 Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:31644 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/90980] New: Missing AVX512 unaligned intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90980 Bug ID: 90980 Summary: Missing AVX512 unaligned intrinsics Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/88918] [meta-bug] x86 intrinsic issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918 Bug 88918 depends on bug 88828, which changed state. Bug 88828 Summary: Inefficient update of the first element of vector registers https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88828 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/88828] Inefficient update of the first element of vector registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88828 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/88918] [meta-bug] x86 intrinsic issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88918 Bug 88918 depends on bug 89021, which changed state. Bug 89021 Summary: Implement mmintrin.h in SSE https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89021 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/89021] Implement mmintrin.h in SSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89021 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/51991] Wrong error message with variables named "SAVE*"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991 --- Comment #19 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 08:11:07AM +, bardeau at iram dot fr wrote: > bardeau ~> cat test.f90 > subroutine sav > integer :: save1 > save1 = > sqrt(1+2+3+4+5+6+cos(0.123)**2-asin(3*exp(12)-8*dble(sin(8

[Bug c/54192] -fno-trapping-math by default?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54192 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/90977] Inconsistencies with inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90977 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Probably more a question for gcc@

[Bug rtl-optimization/66204] [MIPS] LRA: Non-optimal code / regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66204 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra CC|

[Bug sanitizer/90979] New: UBSan breaks OpenMP atomics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90979 Bug ID: 90979 Summary: UBSan breaks OpenMP atomics Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Ass

[Bug tree-optimization/90978] A suspicious code in df-scan.c since r160348

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90978 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/81917] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81917 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9) > Is the fix safe to backport to gcc-7-branch? I've just confirmed that backporting r257542 does fix the ice-on-valid example.

[Bug tree-optimization/90978] A suspicious code in df-scan.c since r160348

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90978 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- The same can be seen here: 3615else 3616 { 3617struct df_scan_problem_data *problem_data 3618 = (struct df_scan_problem_data *) df_scan->problem_data; 3619 gcc_unr

[Bug tree-optimization/90978] New: A suspicious code in df-scan.c since r160348

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90978 Bug ID: 90978 Summary: A suspicious code in df-scan.c since r160348 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-

[Bug rtl-optimization/90977] New: Inconsistencies with inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90977 Bug ID: 90977 Summary: Inconsistencies with inline asm Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/90975] A suspicious code in optabs.c since r177852

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90975 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/90976] New: A suspicious code in lra.c since r177852

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90976 Bug ID: 90976 Summary: A suspicious code in lra.c since r177852 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optim

[Bug c++/81917] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in finish_member_declaration, at cp/semantics.c:3004

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81917 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last reconfirmed|2

[Bug rtl-optimization/90975] New: A suspicious code in optabs.c since r177852

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90975 Bug ID: 90975 Summary: A suspicious code in optabs.c since r177852 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-op

[Bug sanitizer/90954] ICE: combining undefined behavior sanitizer with openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90954 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/90974] A suspicious code in tree-vect-loop.c since r256576

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90974 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyhack Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/90974] A suspicious code in tree-vect-loop.c since r256576

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90974 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- the mode1 set is indeed dead. Yes, new_temp is set in the loop below.

[Bug tree-optimization/90973] A suspicious code in tree-vect-loop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90973 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/90973] A suspicious code in tree-vect-loop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90973 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/90971] Suboptimal diagnostic for is_same_v requirement for std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90971 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (This time with better formatting) For the first error GCC currently shows: > enab.cc:7:6: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed: > enab.cc:6:22: error: no type named 'type' in 'struct s

[Bug target/90972] [9/10 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90972 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/90974] New: A suspicious code in tree-vect-loop.c since r256576

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90974 Bug ID: 90974 Summary: A suspicious code in tree-vect-loop.c since r256576 Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/90971] Suboptimal diagnostic for is_same_v requirement for std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90971 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- #include template struct is_foo : std::false_type { }; template constexpr bool is_foo_v = is_foo::value; template::value>::type> void bar1(T) { } template::value>> void bar2(T) { } template>> void bar3

[Bug tree-optimization/90973] New: A suspicious code in tree-vect-loop.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90973 Bug ID: 90973 Summary: A suspicious code in tree-vect-loop.c Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimiz

[Bug c++/90969] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have vector_type in array_ref_low_bound, at tree.c:13570

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90969 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/90967] -Os produces more code than -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90967 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug rtl-optimization/90968] [10 Regression] ICE in eliminate_regs_in_insn, at lra-eliminations.c:1027

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90968 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.0

[Bug c++/90971] Suboptimal diagnostic for is_same_v requirement for std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90971 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/90966] [9/10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16155

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90966 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/90930] Excessive memory consumption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90930 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- On a -O0 built cross with checking enabled (but with -fno-checking) remaining time-sinks are ipa SRA: 274.81 ( 6%) 0.52 ( 4%) 301.10 ( 7%) 42902 kB ( 2%) alias stmt wa

[Bug middle-end/90963] [10 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90963 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/90972] [9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90972 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- branch revision is r272183

[Bug middle-end/90959] hash_map can be copied but leads to a double-free after assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90959 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- IIRC Jason added the constructor because the C++ FE does this. I think assignment is bad style so just delete that (or declare and not define for old C++ - IIRC we do have = deleted macros in system.h or an

[Bug target/90972] New: [9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2429

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90972 Bug ID: 90972 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2429 Product: gcc Version: 9.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug other/63630] ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2122. unable to find a register to spill in class 'POINTER_REGS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63630 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/90971] New: Suboptimal diagnostic for is_same_v requirement for std::array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90971 Bug ID: 90971 Summary: Suboptimal diagnostic for is_same_v requirement for std::array Product: gcc Version: 9.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/19347] Invariant load not moved out of loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19347 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- The vectorizer already moves the load out of the loop after the runtime alias-check. The vectorizer could hoist the load out of the scalar epilogue loop, that's missing, or it could annotate refs with depen

[Bug tree-optimization/90949] [9 Regression] null pointer check removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90949 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 21 Jun 2019, law at redhat dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90949 > > Jeffrey A. Law changed: > >What|Removed |Added > -

[Bug c++/90969] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have vector_type in array_ref_low_bound, at tree.c:13570

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90969 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/90970] New: A suspicious code in builtins.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90970 Bug ID: 90970 Summary: A suspicious code in builtins.c Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug fortran/90329] Incompatibility between gfortran and C lapack calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90329 --- Comment #49 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Kaz Kylheku from comment #48) > That's the thing I'm keenly curious about: if that value is fortuitously the > right one, in the right place on the stack, where is the crash? > > (Of course, we

[Bug c++/90969] [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have vector_type in array_ref_low_bound, at tree.c:13570

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90969 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/90962] Array bound over optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90962 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/51991] Wrong error message with variables named "SAVE*"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51991 --- Comment #18 from Sebastien Bardeau --- (In reply to kargl from comment #17) > I just realized that your code isn't even close to conforming. > > subroutine sav > integer :: save1 > save1 = something wrong > end subroutine sav > > What

[Bug c++/90969] New: [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have vector_type in array_ref_low_bound, at tree.c:13570

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90969 Bug ID: 90969 Summary: [10 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have vector_type in array_ref_low_bound, at tree.c:13570 Product: gcc Version: 10.0