https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90659
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90658
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90648
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 90649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90649
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90665
Bug ID: 90665
Summary: undefined C type 'int' with gcc 9.1.0 on solaric
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90648
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90539
--- Comment #43 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #42)
> Created attachment 46428 [details]
> Patch which should finally work
>
> So, this does not regress, apparently.
>
> Martin, could you give this one a shot?
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90657
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed May 29 06:09:02 2019
New Revision: 271729
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271729&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove duplicite dg-compile (PR testsuite/90657).
2019-05-29 Martin Lisk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90657
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90664
Bug ID: 90664
Summary: noexcept confuses template argument deduction
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90663
Bug ID: 90663
Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] strcmp (&a[i], a + i) not folded
for arrays and constant index
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90662
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
The inequality in g() should be != 3, not != 5:
void g (int n)
{
char a[n];
__builtin_strcpy (a, "12345");
if (__builtin_strlen (&a[2]) != 3) // not folded
__builtin_abort ();
}
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90539
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46427|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90539
--- Comment #41 from Thomas Koenig ---
Just noticed that this causes a regression in
gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/arrayarg.f90 , but only at certain
optimization levels.
Oh well... need to look some more.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90539
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #46420|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90662
Bug ID: 90662
Summary: strlen of a string in a vla plus offset not folded
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90659
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Looks like missing verify_constant after the get_array_or_vector_nelts call.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90634
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue May 28 20:48:31 2019
New Revision: 271719
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271719&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/90634 reduce allocations in filesystem::path construction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90658
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90658
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90634
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue May 28 19:39:48 2019
New Revision: 271717
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271717&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/90634 reduce allocations in filesystem::path construction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90651
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
The second function is not necessary.
struct object {}
void f (...) {}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90659
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
The crash is here:
3126 unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT max = tree_to_uhwi (nelts);
(gdb) p nelts
$1 =
(gdb) pge
(sizetype) (SAVE_EXPR <(ssizetype) n + -1>) + 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90659
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90661
Bug ID: 90661
Summary: ICE in AlignDeclaration::syntaxCopy, at
d/dmd/attrib.c:670
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90660
Bug ID: 90660
Summary: ICE in TypeQualified::resolveHelper, at
d/dmd/mtype.c:6738
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90659
Bug ID: 90659
Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in tree_to_uhwi, at
tree.h:4352/7291
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90658
Bug ID: 90658
Summary: ICE in default_conversion, at c/c-typeck.c:2159
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90658
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90539
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90634
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue May 28 16:08:51 2019
New Revision: 271712
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271712&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix check for root-directory path and add tests
PR libstdc++/90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88656
--- Comment #6 from gerd at egidy dot de ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5)
> then please update the known-to-work field accordingly.
It seems I'm missing the rights to do so, could someone with the rights please
do that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85598
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #26 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90657
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90634
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue May 28 14:57:35 2019
New Revision: 271710
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271710&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/90634 reduce allocations in filesystem::path construction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90657
Bug ID: 90657
Summary: New test case gcc.dg/ipa/pr90555.c in r271695 fails
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90548
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90548
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue May 28 14:16:38 2019
New Revision: 271708
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271708&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/90548 - ICE with generic lambda and empty pack.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63149
Az changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||azalepiej at o2 dot pl
--- Comment #4 from Az ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87699
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88656
--- Comment #5 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to gerd from comment #4)
> (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #3)
> > A regression is not a bug that applies in all previous releases. A
> > regression is where something worked in some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90548
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue May 28 14:00:29 2019
New Revision: 271705
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271705&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/90548 - ICE with generic lambda and empty pack.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90656
Bug ID: 90656
Summary: Illegal operand from Fortran program WRF with
mcpu=niagara3
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88656
--- Comment #4 from gerd at egidy dot de ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #3)
> A regression is not a bug that applies in all previous releases. A
> regression is where something worked in some previous releases but does not
> work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88656
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to gerd from comment #2)
> Could it be that this is a duplicate of bug 88167?
>
> I compiled a gcc 7.4.0 patched with the fix for 88167 and now get this
> result:
>
> push{r4, lr}
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90646
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It could also be Bug 90557 (which is fixed in the gcc-9-branch but present in
the gcc 9.1.0 release) but the symptoms don't look similar.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90646
--- Comment #6 from myLC at gmx dot net ---
I'm afraid that wasn't it. I rebuilt the Nana (GUI) library with the same
compiler (gcc/c++-9.1.0) and I'm still facing the same problem.
Valgrind croaked with 'Process finished with exit code 9', which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90648
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Some checking is needed even if the C FE is improved, in particular, one can do
stuff like:
return ((int (*) (int)) memcpy) (5);
etc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90648
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> So perhaps the way forward is just do a better job on the C FE side too, if
> the user provided decl is too different, make sure not to overwrite the old
> anticipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90315
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90315
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue May 28 12:05:50 2019
New Revision: 271700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Support again multiple --help options (PR other/90315).
2019-05-28 Marti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89441
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue May 28 11:54:45 2019
New Revision: 271698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r269278
2019-05-28 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89009
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue May 28 11:54:33 2019
New Revision: 271697
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271697&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r268762 (test-suite)
2019-05-28 Martin Liska
Backpo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90649
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90649
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> This is essentially a dup of PR90648, what I said there applies here too, I
> think genmatch should verify number of call arguments before reading them.
Are you J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90555
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90555
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue May 28 11:42:46 2019
New Revision: 271695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=271695&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle loop fields in IPA ICF (PR ipa/90555).
2019-05-28 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90648
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Another thing is that gimple_builtin_call_types_compatible_p compares the
argument types to the TYPE_ARG_TYPES of the fndecl, but that could very well be
the user provided prototype rather than what GCC relie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70196
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
ordering comparison of pointers is only well-defined when the two pointers
point into the same object (including one-past-the-end). [expr.ref]/4
No object can have a NULL address.
The third bullet permits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90648
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The fact that it is a call to builtin is determined just by the call calling a
fndecl which has builtin class different from none.
At GIMPLE perhaps we could cache whether it is a valid builtin call in some
G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90648
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
Is there a way we could check the arguments early in a single place, and if
they don't match, create a regular function call instead of a bogus call to a
builtin? This is so we don't have to check the arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90649
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90655
Bug ID: 90655
Summary: make install fails with empty DESTDIR on cygwin
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90651
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
Confirmed that segfault happens in upstream as well.
By the way, it would be interesting to see if any more problems can be found
just by prefixing all these generated tests with 'module object;' as the first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90650
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
Related upstream bug, with fix (makes code an error).
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15407
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90634
--- Comment #9 from baltic <1000hz.radiowave at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> The libc++ implementation also fails this test:
As i've shown before, neither of those are failures. By the current C++
standard a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90654
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65816
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adrianbibbywalther at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90649
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
69 matches
Mail list logo
