[Bug other/63509] Misleading error message when building gcc without C++ compiler installed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63509 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/90307] -Wuninitialized only at -O1, not at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90307 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- SRA decided to do this: [t88.c:27:24] x.u.internal = [t88.c:27:30] [t88.c:27:28] MEM[(const struct sstring &)[t88.c:49:17] &s].u.internal; [t88.c:27:24] x$u$external$str_24 = [t88.c:27:24] MEM[(union cont

[Bug c++/90307] New: -Wuninitialized only at -O1, not at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90307 Bug ID: 90307 Summary: -Wuninitialized only at -O1, not at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug pch/90306] New: ICE when using precompiled headers with -MD and -fpch-deps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90306 Bug ID: 90306 Summary: ICE when using precompiled headers with -MD and -fpch-deps Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug fortran/90133] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Linker error from accessing event_type via use association outside associate/block scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90133 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > So this is fixed on GCC 6? But not Trunk? (Or more recent releases?) A regression is something working at revision n and broken at revision n+1. Here it seems that a GCC7 revision broke the gfortra

[Bug fortran/90133] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Linker error from accessing event_type via use association outside associate/block scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90133 --- Comment #2 from Zaak --- Hi Dominique, So this is fixed on GCC 6? But not Trunk? (Or more recent releases?)

[Bug fortran/90305] ASSOCIATE with a substring of a deferred-length character selector yields garbage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90305 --- Comment #1 from Damian Rouson --- The code gives the expected output "f" with GCC 9.

[Bug target/87833] [9/10 Regression] Intel MIC (emulated) offloading: "relocation [...] can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87833 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Do yo

[Bug fortran/61968] ICE (assembly failure) due to wrongly generating a vtable for TYPE(*) / BT_ASSUMED_TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61968 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/90291] [8/9/10 Regression] Inline namespace erroneously extends another namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90291 --- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell --- Thanks for the context. Clang intends to, but does not yet, implement DR2061. which is why you're seeing the different behaviour there, at least. Continuig discussion on the C++ Core list,

[Bug debug/83935] DWARF for a variant part is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83935 --- Comment #10 from Tom Tromey --- I have been looking at this again recently, for Ada, and now I think perhaps the approach that GCC takes should be preferred. At first I was thinking maybe the compiler could linearize the members of the emitt

[Bug fortran/90305] New: ASSOCIATE with a substring of a deferred-length character selector yields garbage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90305 Bug ID: 90305 Summary: ASSOCIATE with a substring of a deferred-length character selector yields garbage Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug c++/90304] -O3 vectorization gets worse when code is moved into main()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90304 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- There is another bug that is similar; the issue is restrict related.

[Bug fortran/61968] ICE (assembly failure) due to wrongly generating a vtable for TYPE(*) / BT_ASSUMED_TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61968 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Hmm... some analysis. This is a strange piece of code... interface subroutine test_lib (a, len) bind(C, name="test") use iso_c_binding, only: c_size_t !GCC$ ATTRIBUTES NO_ARG_CHECK :: a

[Bug c++/90304] New: -O3 vectorization gets worse when code is moved into main()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90304 Bug ID: 90304 Summary: -O3 vectorization gets worse when code is moved into main() Product: gcc Version: 10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/90303] [9/10 Regression] ICE in hash_odr_name with fastcall attribute starting with r267359

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90303 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |c++ --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek -

[Bug tree-optimization/90303] [9/10 Regression] ICE in hash_odr_name with fastcall attribute starting with r267359

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90303 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.2

[Bug tree-optimization/90303] New: [9/10 Regression] ICE in hash_odr_name with fastcall attribute starting with r267359

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90303 Bug ID: 90303 Summary: [9/10 Regression] ICE in hash_odr_name with fastcall attribute starting with r267359 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug c++/90291] [8/9/10 Regression] Inline namespace erroneously extends another namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90291 --- Comment #8 from Igor A. Goussarov --- P.S. It seems that different compilers have different ideas about inline namespaces. If godbolt.org can be trusted, clang-8.0 and msvc 2017 do not merge namespaces in described scenario.

[Bug fortran/60144] Misleading error message when missing "then" after "if" and "else if"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60144 --- Comment #7 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Wed May 1 17:40:22 2019 New Revision: 270776 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270776&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-05-01 Dominique d'Humieres PR fortran/60144

[Bug c++/90291] [8/9/10 Regression] Inline namespace erroneously extends another namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90291 --- Comment #7 from Igor A. Goussarov --- The intent is to have a lot of services, each defined in its dedicated namespace. The hierarchy of those namespaces can grow to arbitrary depth: component component::service_a component::group_b::service

[Bug tree-optimization/88797] [7/8/9 Regression] Unneeded branch added when function is inlined (function runs faster if not inlined)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88797 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9/10 Regression] |[7/8/9 Regression] Unneeded

[Bug tree-optimization/88797] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Unneeded branch added when function is inlined (function runs faster if not inlined)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88797 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed May 1 17:33:32 2019 New Revision: 270775 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270775&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/88797 * gimple-ssa-split-paths (is_fea

[Bug fortran/61968] ICE (assembly failure) due to wrongly generating a vtable for TYPE(*) / BT_ASSUMED_TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61968 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- On darwin I don't see the "Assembler messages".

[Bug fortran/61968] ICE (assembly failure) due to wrongly generating a vtable for TYPE(*) / BT_ASSUMED_TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61968 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4) > With gcc-9, gcc-8 and trunk I get To be more precise, with a current gcc-9 snapshot: $ gfortran -c pr61968.f90 /tmp/ccqFh8vs.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccqFh8

[Bug c++/90291] [8/9/10 Regression] Inline namespace erroneously extends another namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90291 --- Comment #6 from Igor A. Goussarov --- Yes, this is a slightly modified excerpt from real code. Perhaps a less abridged example would make more sense: // Code in logger.h namespace component { inline namespace utility { namesp

[Bug fortran/61968] ICE (assembly failure) due to wrongly generating a vtable for TYPE(*) / BT_ASSUMED_TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61968 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug middle-end/90302] Implement __builtin_warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90302 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/90133] [7/8/9/10 Regression] Linker error from accessing event_type via use association outside associate/block scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90133 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/90302] Implement __builtin_warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90302 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Error can be implement using the error attribute on a function.

[Bug middle-end/90302] New: Implement __builtin_warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90302 Bug ID: 90302 Summary: Implement __builtin_warning Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug fortran/90207] Debugging generated tree code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90207 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/90297] gcc/fortran/resolve.c: 2 * possibly redundant code ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90297 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/90301] New: RangeV3 usage, ICE internal compiler error: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90301 Bug ID: 90301 Summary: RangeV3 usage, ICE internal compiler error: canonical types differ for identical types Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/86538] GCC should define a macro to specify if LSE is enabled or not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86538] GCC should define a macro to specify if LSE is enabled or not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86538 --- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- Author: ramana Date: Wed May 1 15:27:40 2019 New Revision: 270770 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270770&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [Patch AArch64] Add __ARM_FEATURE_ATOMICS This keeps coming up

[Bug c++/90300] "control reaches end of non-void function" warning despite exhaustive switch for enum class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90300 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin

[Bug c++/85714] -Wimplicit-fallthrough and nested exhaustive switch statements with enum classes and return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85714 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maic23 at live dot de --- Comment #6 fro

[Bug c++/90300] "control reaches end of non-void function" warning despite exhaustive switch for enum class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90300 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/90300] New: "control reaches end of non-void function" warning despite exhaustive switch for enum class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90300 Bug ID: 90300 Summary: "control reaches end of non-void function" warning despite exhaustive switch for enum class Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/87249] Undefined reference within a header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87249 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug target/89093] [9 Regression] C++ exception handling clobbers d8 VFP register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89093 --- Comment #88 from Tamar Christina --- Thanks Jakub!

[Bug libstdc++/90299] New: std::filesystem::absolute("") and std::filesystem::absolute("", ec) behave differently

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90299 Bug ID: 90299 Summary: std::filesystem::absolute("") and std::filesystem::absolute("", ec) behave differently Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug c++/87249] Undefined reference within a header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87249 Dimitris Eftaxiopoulos changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/90297] gcc/fortran/resolve.c: 2 * possibly redundant code ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90297 --- Comment #2 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- dh! Thanks. Paul On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 08:27, dcb314 at hotmail dot com wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90297 > > David Binderman changed: > >

[Bug c++/89422] [8 Regression] ICE in field_byte_offset, at dwarf2out.c:19086

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89422 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84655] internal compiler error: unexpected expression 'a' of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84655 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- I tried out various versions of gcc trunk, from revision 269700 to 270600 and could see no ice. I'd be interested to find out what Marek did to reproduce it.

[Bug other/90251] missing spaces in string literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90251 --- Comment #2 from Roland Illig --- I posted an updated version of the linter to bug 79618, and I will post further updates only there.

[Bug c/45358] Diagnostic could be issued for old C style a =+ b and similar cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45358 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||87403 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager

[Bug lto/51765] [9/10 Regression] Testsuite ICEs with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51765 --- Comment #10 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #8) > FAIL: gcc.dg/nested-func-12.c (internal compiler error) > FAIL: gcc.dg/nested-func-9.c (internal compiler error) I cannot reproduce these as for now. I believe i

[Bug c++/89422] [8 Regression] ICE in field_byte_offset, at dwarf2out.c:19086

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89422 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/84655] internal compiler error: unexpected expression 'a' of kind template_parm_index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84655 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug c/80130] Wrong diagnostic: dereferencing type-punned pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80130 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c/77331] incorrect range location in -Wformat with a concatenated format literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77331 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug translation/90118] Missing space between words

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90118 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug translation/90118] Missing space between words

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90118 --- Comment #9 from Roland Illig --- The particular issue has been fixed, the linter has been updated in bug 90176, therefore I think this bug can be closed.

[Bug translation/79618] prevent missing space in multiline string literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79618 --- Comment #7 from Roland Illig --- Created attachment 46269 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46269&action=edit linter for string literals The attached linter detects: * multiline string literals that have the space at the

[Bug c/90296] C11 anonymous struct not liked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90296 Fred J. Tydeman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/88568] [7 Regression] 'dllimport' no longer implies 'extern' in C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88568 --- Comment #27 from jon_y <10walls at gmail dot com> --- Thanks Jakub.

[Bug libquadmath/90298] libquadmath/math/catanhq.c:113: possibly redundant code ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90298 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Same thing in different file in same library. libquadmath/math/catanq.c:92]: (style) Assignment 'den=0' is redundant with condition 'den==0'. svn blame says: 265822 jsm28 if (den == 0)

[Bug libquadmath/90298] libquadmath/math/catanhq.c:113: possibly redundant code ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90298 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug libquadmath/90298] New: libquadmath/math/catanhq.c:113: possibly redundant code ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90298 Bug ID: 90298 Summary: libquadmath/math/catanhq.c:113: possibly redundant code ? Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug fortran/90297] gcc/fortran/resolve.c: 2 * possibly redundant code ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90297 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/90297] New: gcc/fortran/resolve.c: 2 * possibly redundant code ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90297 Bug ID: 90297 Summary: gcc/fortran/resolve.c: 2 * possibly redundant code ? Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug debug/90273] [10 Regression] GCC runs out of memory building Firefox

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90273 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] GCC runs |[10 Regression] GCC runs

[Bug rtl-optimization/90026] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: missing barrier after block 2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90026 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90208] [7 Regression] error: EH landing pad label

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90208 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1 Summary|[7/8 Regression

[Bug target/90193] [8 Regression] asm goto with TLS "m" input operand generates incorrect assembler in O1 and O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90193 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/90108] ICE: Segmentation fault (in c_tree_chain_next)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90108 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/90187] [8 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90187 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/90090] [7 Regression] ICE in mark_reachable_handlers, at tree-eh.c:3938 since r219202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90090 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1 Summary|[7/8 Regression

[Bug c++/90010] [8 Regression] valgrind error with snprintf and -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90010 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/90026] [8 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: missing barrier after block 2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90026 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/89965] [8 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=nano-x2 -fcaller-saves -fexpensive-optimizations -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89965 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c/89946] [8 Regression] ICE in assemble_start_function, at varasm.c:1871

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89946 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89998] [7 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed in printf-return-value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89998 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 regression] ICE: |[7 regression] ICE: |v

[Bug sanitizer/89869] -fsanitize=undefined miscompilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89869 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/89796] Incorrect warning generated with OpenMP atomic capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89796 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 9.1+ and 8.4+ so far.

[Bug c/89933] [7 Regression] ICE in merge_decls, at c/c-decl.c:2517

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89933 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE in |[7 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c/89872] [7 Regression] GCC does not generate read access to volatile compound literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89872 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] GCC does |[7 Regression] GCC does not

[Bug c++/89767] [8 Regression] ICE with tuple and optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89767 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/89768] [7 Regression] ICE in compare_and_jump_seq at loop-unroll.c:838

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89768 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1, 9.0 Summary|[7/8 Regre

[Bug target/89752] [8 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3723

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89752 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/89703] [8 Regression] ICE in compare_values_warnv, at tree-vrp.c:997

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89703 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/89734] [7 Regression] const qualifier on return type not erased inside __typeof__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89734 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1, 9.0 Summary|[7/8 Regre

[Bug target/89726] [7 Regression] Incorrect inlined version of 'ceil' for 32bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89726 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] Incorrect |[7 Regression] Incorrect

[Bug debug/89704] [7 Regression] ICE in add_const_value_attribute, at dwarf2out.c:19685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89704 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE in |[7 Regression] ICE in

[Bug rtl-optimization/89679] [7 Regression] wrong code with -Og -frerun-cse-after-loop -fno-tree-fre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89679 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1, 9.0 Summary|[7/8 Regre

[Bug ipa/89684] [8 Regression] ICE in gsi_for_stmt, at gimple-iterator.c:613

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89684 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/89621] [7 Regression] ICE with allocatable character and openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89621 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with

[Bug middle-end/89663] [7 Regression] ICE in expand_builtin_int_roundingfn_2, at builtins.c:2831

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89663 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1 Summary|[7/8 Regression

[Bug fortran/89651] OpenMP private array uninitialized warning with -O flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89651 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 8.4+ too.

[Bug target/89587] gcc's rs6000 configuration unconditionally sets MULTIARCH_DIRNAME, even when multiarch is disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89587 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 8.4+ too.

[Bug middle-end/89590] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_emit_free_warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89590 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE in |[7 Regression] ICE in

[Bug c++/89512] [7 Regression] ICE in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:882

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89512 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1, 9.0 Summary|[7/8 Regre

[Bug c/89520] [7 Regression] ICE tree check: accessed operand 4 of call_expr with 3 operands in convert_to_integer_1, at convert.c:668

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89520 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE tree |[7 Regression] ICE tree

[Bug middle-end/89412] [7 Regression] gcc ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:6273 on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89412 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1 Summary|[7/8 Regression

[Bug debug/89498] [8 Regression] ICE in AT_loc_list, at dwarf2out.c:4871

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89498 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/89403] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_clone_body, at cp/optimize.c:693

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89403 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1, 9.0 Summary|[7/8 Regre

[Bug middle-end/88588] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1329

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88588 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.3.1 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

  1   2   >