https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Apr 22 06:50:33 2019
New Revision: 270489
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270489&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-04-22 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/57284
* resolve.c (fin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90198
--- Comment #3 from guido ---
Hello Kargl,
Thank you a lot! The problem was that I was calling the
heat_function_field incorrectly. I forgot to put the "()" and the error
message wasn't that helpful. Therefore this is not a bug at all.
Cheers,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18635
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid |diagnostic
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90198
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reduced testcase.
program test
implicit none
contains
real function foo(temp)
real, intent(in) :: temp
foo=bah()*(2)
end function foo
real function ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38182
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90198
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90174
--- Comment #2 from Feng Xue ---
Created attachment 46219
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46219&action=edit
asm file generated by llvm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90174
--- Comment #1 from Feng Xue ---
Created attachment 46218
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46218&action=edit
asm file generated by gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90200
Bug ID: 90200
Summary: [graphite] ICE: Segmentation fault (in
apply_schedule_on_deps)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90199
Bug ID: 90199
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected complex_cst, have plus_expr
in output_constant, at varasm.c:4994
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90198
Bug ID: 90198
Summary: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at
expr.c:229
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90130
--- Comment #2 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Sun Apr 21 20:26:12 2019
New Revision: 270485
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270485&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR d/90130
d/dmd: Merge upstream dmd 065fbd452
Fixes en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118
--- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 46216
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46216&action=edit
Patch for the remaining problems.
I am registering this now as a measure of progress towards doing a proper job
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90178
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90178
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Apr 21 18:23:00 2019
New Revision: 270484
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270484&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
LRA: Revert "Remove useless move insns"
Useless move insn removal
gcc-bugs +
开各地正规普通增值税票，点优惠，包真。
详 电 ：林（姐） 业务部
手机及V信：133-6051-3868
Q Q : 692210769
+++lBWeIaCyj+++
2:09胶俞,%hSZWu丝歌会
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90196
--- Comment #5 from Максим Прохоренко ---
using namespace std;
class __attribute__((warn_unused)) kw
{
public:
bitset<12> flags{"0010"};
};
int main() {
printf("Hello World!\n");
kw KW;
puts(to_string(sizeof(kw)).c_str());
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88431
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
Added some debug prints in the boilerplate check.
configure:12017: Checking compiler boilerplate from: $CC -o conftest$ac_exeext
$CFLAGS $CPPFLAGS $LDFLAGS conftest.$ac_ext $LIBS >&5
configure:12018: module mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83029
--- Comment #5 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> Which version of glibc are you using?
"Debian GLIBC 2.24-12".
I believe this bug should be closed as fixed or invalid:
1. The original test case does not f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55203
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maxim.prohorenko at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90196
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88431
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #1)
> This config line works fine:
>
> ../trunk/configure --prefix=/home/dcb/gcc/results.266950 \
> --disable-multilib \
> --disable-werror \
> --ena
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90197
Bug ID: 90197
Summary: [8/9 Regression] Cannot step through simple loop at -O
-g
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90196
--- Comment #3 from Максим Прохоренко ---
Allocate GiB of unused memory and don't warn about it? But 1 simple double - it
is a big problem.
For std:: objects with side effect - OK!
But for simple unused vector or set or map???
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90196
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The warning works as intended. Types with a non-trivial destructor do not cause
a warning, because if the destructor has side effects then the variable is not
unused. We don't want to warn for types like st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83029
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Which version of glibc are you using?
Dear Manager,
Happy New Year!
This is Kevin from INSTARGO CO.,LTD
We are factory produce a wide range of CCTV Accessories, POE switch, Tester,
Power Supply, IR Lighting, BNC Connector, CCTV Housing & Bracket,Wire/Cable,
Microphone,Video Balun, Lens, package etc.
All of the products are high quali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88238
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
>
> which allow libgdruntime.so and libgphobos.so to link on Solaris 11.3 without
> unresolved symbols, there are more on Solaris 10:
>
> *
> symbol not found:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90178
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini ---
The Component field is wrong, right?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90172
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90064
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90064
--- Comment #1 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Sun Apr 21 10:21:07 2019
New Revision: 270483
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270483&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR d/90064
libphobos: Merge upstream phobos 428460dd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89900
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89017
--- Comment #4 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ibuclaw
Date: Sun Apr 21 07:03:32 2019
New Revision: 270478
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270478&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
d: Use semanticRun to prevent declaration pass from running
34 matches
Mail list logo
