[Bug c++/85400] invalid Local Dynamic TLS relaxation for symbol defined in method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85400 Pádraig Brady changed: What|Removed |Added CC||P at draigBrady dot com --- Comment #9 f

[Bug target/89951] Uncorrect instructions flag for Nehalem / westmere arch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89951 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89958] New: ICE and duplicate diagnostic with invalid return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89958 Bug ID: 89958 Summary: ICE and duplicate diagnostic with invalid return value Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic, error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-cod

[Bug tree-optimization/89956] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gsi_for_stmt(gimple*))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89956 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug tree-optimization/89956] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gsi_for_stmt(gimple*))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89956 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89953] ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/89957] ICE calling strnlen with an int128_t bound in a known range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89957 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/89957] ICE calling strnlen with an int128_t bound in a known range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89957 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code See Also|

[Bug middle-end/89957] New: ICE calling strnlen with an int128_t bound in a known range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89957 Bug ID: 89957 Summary: ICE calling strnlen with an int128_t bound in a known range Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug bootstrap/89864] [9 regression] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 --- Comment #21 from Erik Schnetter --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-04/msg00162.html

[Bug tree-optimization/89956] New: [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gsi_for_stmt(gimple*))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89956 Bug ID: 89956 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in gsi_for_stmt(gimple*)) Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-co

[Bug c++/86986] [7/8/9 Regression] Unexpected errors for template parameter pack in a template template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86986 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug middle-end/89911] [9 Regression] ICE in get_attr_nonstring_decl, at calls.c:1502

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89911 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug target/89955] New: riscv.h improperly defines STARTFILE_PREFIX_SPEC spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89955 Bug ID: 89955 Summary: riscv.h improperly defines STARTFILE_PREFIX_SPEC spec Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug fortran/89375] fortran/expr.c:4723:5: warning: logical ‘or’ of equal expressions [-Wlogical-op]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89375 --- Comment #5 from Fritz Reese --- Thanks Dominiq. On Wed, Apr 3, 2019, 05:02 dominiq at lps dot ens.fr < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89375 > > Dominique d'Humieres changed: > >W

[Bug rtl-optimization/80960] [7/8/9 Regression] Huge memory use when compiling a very large test case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960 --- Comment #17 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #16) > I would guess so. I wonder if the combiner could restrict itself > here? Maybe LUID "distances" are an approximation? Doesn't the > combiner use DF

[Bug rtl-optimization/86928] ICE in compute_live, at sel-sched.c:3097

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86928 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #5) > I didn't have any better ideas, so fixed via comment #2. Thanks!

[Bug ipa/89893] Segmentation fault always occurs when node app is generated by gcc-8-branch@268745

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89893 --- Comment #10 from 康 珊 --- Hi Martin Liška, I tried to build it with "-O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -falign-functions=32 -fno-math-errno -fno-semantic-interposition -fno-trapping-math", but it still had the issue. Can "-fno-strict-aliasing" work nor

[Bug target/89954] missed optimization for signed extension for x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89954 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target|

[Bug c/89954] New: missed optimization for signed extension for x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89954 Bug ID: 89954 Summary: missed optimization for signed extension for x86-64 Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug middle-end/89934] [9 Regression] ICE on a call with fewer arguments to strncpy declared without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934 JunMa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||JunMa at linux dot alibaba.com --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug c++/89937] For example code, which is valid as either C or C++, optimization seems much better for C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89937 --- Comment #2 from Walt Karas --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > This is because of the way inline have different semantics between the two > langauges. > > If I change TSFastDbg to be static instead of just inline, then the code

[Bug rtl-optimization/87763] [9 Regression] aarch64 target testcases fail after r265398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763 --- Comment #38 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #37) > (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #36) > > I wonder if we could pass in a scratch register from try_combine down to > > make_field_assignment to facilita

[Bug d/89255] libphobos.unittests multilib handling broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89255 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #46060|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug d/89823] Composed message only partially translatable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89823 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug translation/40883] [meta-bug] Translation breakage with trivial fixes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40883 Bug 40883 depends on bug 89823, which changed state. Bug 89823 Summary: Composed message only partially translatable https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89823 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/89331] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_simple_base_path, at cp/class.c:589

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89331 --- Comment #7 from Stas Sergeev --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #4) > But when we're in the middle of the class definition we don't know yet > whether it's standard-layout, so we can't answer yet. A compiler is allowed > to reorder

[Bug fortran/89938] inconsistent wording regarding assumed shape

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89938 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pdt_4.f03: type(modtype(8,*)) :: mod_r ! { dg-error "ASSUMED type parameters" } The test is not part of the attached patch.

[Bug fortran/89938] inconsistent wording regarding assumed shape

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89938 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 46085 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46085&action=edit Adjust the tests

[Bug fortran/89938] inconsistent wording regarding assumed shape

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89938 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unass

[Bug fortran/89938] inconsistent wording regarding assumed shape

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89938 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 46084 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46084&action=edit Hyphen compounds: assumed shape and other related ones

[Bug c++/89331] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_simple_base_path, at cp/class.c:589

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89331 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/81866] [7/8 Regression] ICE with a default template parameter which is a template class nested in a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81866 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] ICE with |[7/8 Regression] ICE with a

[Bug c++/81866] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with a default template parameter which is a template class nested in a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81866 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 3 21:51:36 2019 New Revision: 270138 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270138&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/81866 - ICE with member template and default targ. This te

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 --- Comment #9 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Wed Apr 3 21:32:13 2019 New Revision: 270137 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270137&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-04-03 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/68567

[Bug rtl-optimization/87763] [9 Regression] aarch64 target testcases fail after r265398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763 --- Comment #37 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #36) > I wonder if we could pass in a scratch register from try_combine down to > make_field_assignment to facilitate something like this... I have found that make_f

[Bug rtl-optimization/87763] [9 Regression] aarch64 target testcases fail after r265398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87763 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #36 f

[Bug c++/81866] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with a default template parameter which is a template class nested in a template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81866 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/89953] New: ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1244

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89953 Bug ID: 89953 Summary: ICE in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1244 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug bootstrap/86518] Strengthen bootstrap comparison by not enabling warnings at stage3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518 Bug 86518 depends on bug 86586, which changed state. Bug 86586 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] -Wsign-compare affects code generation https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86586 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/86586] [7/8/9 Regression] -Wsign-compare affects code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86586 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/86586] [7/8/9 Regression] -Wsign-compare affects code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86586 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 3 20:12:00 2019 New Revision: 270136 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270136&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86586 - -fcompare-debug=-Wsign-compare. This patch limits

[Bug c++/89331] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_simple_base_path, at cp/class.c:589

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89331 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 3 20:09:17 2019 New Revision: 270135 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270135&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/89331 - ICE with offsetof in incomplete class. We were abo

[Bug bootstrap/89864] [9 regression] gcc fails to build/bootstrap with XCode 10.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89864 --- Comment #20 from Erik Schnetter --- I have a patch that works for 8.3.0. It doesn't work for 9.0.0 (i.e. an svn checkout); I'm working on this.

[Bug c++/89947] Resolution of base classes fail for some automatic types in template struct functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89947 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug fortran/84487] [8/9 Regression] Large rodate section increase in 465.tonto with r254427

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #22

[Bug c/89946] [8/9 Regression] ICE in assemble_start_function, at varasm.c:1871

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89946 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|UN

[Bug target/89952] S/390: Inconsistent CFI info when restoring frame pointer from fpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89952 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel --- Created attachment 46083 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46083&action=edit Experimental patch

[Bug middle-end/89934] [9 Regression] ICE on a call with fewer arguments to strncpy declared without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug target/89952] New: S/390: Inconsistent CFI info when restoring frame pointer from fpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89952 Bug ID: 89952 Summary: S/390: Inconsistent CFI info when restoring frame pointer from fpr Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/67744] [OOP] polymorphic associating entity is refused TBP invocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67744 --- Comment #5 from Bader at lrz dot de --- This is still not fixed in current trunk.

[Bug tree-optimization/89730] -flive-patching=inline-only-static should grant always_inline attribute for extern function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89730 --- Comment #2 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: qinzhao Date: Wed Apr 3 19:00:25 2019 New Revision: 270134 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270134&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-04-03 qing zhao PR tree-optimization/89730

[Bug target/89951] New: Uncorrect flag for Nehalem / westmere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89951 Bug ID: 89951 Summary: Uncorrect flag for Nehalem / westmere Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug fortran/49565] character(kind=4) is emitted as DW_ATE_unsigned, not DW_ATE_unsigned_char

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #11 from Dominique

[Bug fortran/41650] [Cleanup] Use gfc_expr_attr in resolve_allocate_expr/resolve_deallocate_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41650 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/89950] New: attribute aligned ignored with attribute vector_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89950 Bug ID: 89950 Summary: attribute aligned ignored with attribute vector_size Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug fortran/89646] [7/8/9 Regression] Spurious actual argument might interfere warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89646 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I meant "replace the 0". The replacement could be OPT_Wsurprising (-Wsurprising, included in -Wall) or OPT_Wextra (-Wextra) or yet a new option. The warning is tested in gfortran.dg/elemental_depen

[Bug c++/89949] New: Internal compiler error with lambda as template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89949 Bug ID: 89949 Summary: Internal compiler error with lambda as template argument Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/89948] New: [9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2430

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89948 Bug ID: 89948 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2430 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug middle-end/89934] [9 Regression] ICE on a call with fewer arguments to strncpy declared without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/89947] New: Resolution of base classes fail for some automatic types in template struct functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89947 Bug ID: 89947 Summary: Resolution of base classes fail for some automatic types in template struct functions Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug c/89946] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE in assemble_start_function, at varasm.c:1871

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89946 Bug ID: 89946 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE in assemble_start_function, at varasm.c:1871 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86567] [8/9 Regression] -Wnonnull/-Wformat/-Wrestrict affect code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86567 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/86518] Strengthen bootstrap comparison by not enabling warnings at stage3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86518 Bug 86518 depends on bug 86567, which changed state. Bug 86567 Summary: [8/9 Regression] -Wnonnull/-Wformat/-Wrestrict affect code generation https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86567 What|Removed |Add

[Bug target/89945] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gen_lowpart_general, at rtlhooks.c:63

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89945 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/89945] New: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gen_lowpart_general, at rtlhooks.c:63

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89945 Bug ID: 89945 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gen_lowpart_general, at rtlhooks.c:63 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/89399] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'set', 'clobber' or 'clobber_high', have 'parallel' in combine_reaching_defs, at ree.c:783

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89399 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So I think in the immediate term any time we're using PATTERN (cand->insn) we really should be using single_set (cand->insn). We already know we've passed the single_set test when we put the insn onto the c

[Bug c/89944] New: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in mark_jump_label_1, at jump.c:1152

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89944 Bug ID: 89944 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in mark_jump_label_1, at jump.c:1152 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug middle-end/89934] [9 Regression] ICE on a call with fewer arguments to strncpy declared without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89934 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code Status|NE

[Bug target/89929] __attribute__((target("avx512bw"))) doesn't work on non avx512bw systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89929 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- __attribute__((target("foo"))) can be used in 2 different ways: 1. Enable FOO, which works for both C and C++. 2. Function versioning with FOO, which works only for C++. 2 is a subset of 1. We should improve err

[Bug libstdc++/87431] valueless_by_exception() should unconditionally return false if all the constructors are noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87431 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely --- Proposed new patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-04/msg00142.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/81025] [8 Regression] gcc ICE while building glibc for MIPS soft-float multi-lib variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] gcc ICE|[8 Regression] gcc ICE

[Bug rtl-optimization/81025] [8/9 Regression] gcc ICE while building glibc for MIPS soft-float multi-lib variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025 --- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Apr 3 16:03:37 2019 New Revision: 270129 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270129&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/81025 * reorg.c (skip_consecutive_labe

[Bug c++/89596] [8/9 regression] Multiple templated conversion operators result in compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89596 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86521] [8 Regression] GCC 8 selects incorrect overload of ref-qualified conversion operator template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86521 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jleahy+gcc at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/89596] [8/9 regression] Multiple templated conversion operators result in compilation error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89596 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89331] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_simple_base_path, at cp/class.c:589

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89331 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/89878] same specializations on a zero-initialized struct object as a non-type parameter treated as distinct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89878 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/89833] [9 Regression] sorry, unimplemented: string literal in function template signature

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89833 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug c++/47488] sorry, unimplemented: string literal in function template signature

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47488 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug middle-end/89797] ICE on a vector_size (1LU << 33) int variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89797 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug c++/87770] [8 Regression] ICE in type_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.c:25230

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87770 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roman.s.dubtsov at intel dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/89919] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error when building MKL-DNN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89919 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/89798] excessive vector_size silently accepted and truncated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89798 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug tree-optimization/89582] Suboptimal code generated for floating point struct in -O3 compare to -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89582 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 from

[Bug fortran/68567] ICE on using wrong defined arrays (different cases/messages)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68567 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Packaging submitted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-04/msg7.html.

[Bug c++/64095] [C++14] Ellipsis at end of generic lambda parameter-declaration-clause should be parsed as a parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Seyyed Soroosh Hosseinalipour from comment #15) > @jason what is work around for gcc6 ? See comment 6. Name the pack.

[Bug lto/88643] -Wl,--wrap not supported with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88643 --- Comment #11 from Дилян Палаузов --- Reported for ld.gold at https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24415 .

[Bug lto/88643] -Wl,--wrap not supported with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88643 --- Comment #10 from Дилян Палаузов --- With the patch applied this works: clang -flto -fuse-ld=bfd -Wl,--wrap=read -O3 t.c gcc -flto -fuse-ld=bfd -Wl,--wrap=read -O3 t.c gcc -flto -fuse-ld=bfd -Wl,--wrap=read -O2 t.c gcc -flto -fuse-ld

[Bug lto/88643] -Wl,--wrap not supported with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88643 --- Comment #9 from Дилян Палаузов --- With the patch applied to ld.bfd “clang -flto -fuse-ld=bfd -Wl,--wrap=read t.c” does work.

[Bug sanitizer/82501] AddressSanitizer does not handle negative offset for first global variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82501 --- Comment #31 from Andrey Drobyshev --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #30) > in a couple of most common data sections In which sections exactly? If we cover only the most common ones (thus leaving other sections which might need prot

[Bug tree-optimization/89582] Suboptimal code generated for floating point struct in -O3 compare to -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89582 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Looks like LLVM has all the ABI details exposed very early but also in a very awkward way(?). The vfloat one shows define { <2 x float>, <2 x float> } @f(<2 x float> %x.coerce0, <2 x float> %x.coerce1, <2

[Bug lto/88643] -Wl,--wrap not supported with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88643 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #8 from

[Bug c++/64095] [C++14] Ellipsis at end of generic lambda parameter-declaration-clause should be parsed as a parameter pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64095 Seyyed Soroosh Hosseinalipour changed: What|Removed |Added CC||soorosh_abi at hotmail do

[Bug c/71598] Wrong optimization with aliasing enums

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71598 --- Comment #15 from Christophe Lyon --- Author: clyon Date: Wed Apr 3 13:17:04 2019 New Revision: 270126 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270126&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [testsuite] PR71598: Fix testcases 2019-04-13 Christophe Lyon

[Bug libstdc++/89927] Inconsistent behavior in std::regex when optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89927 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|INVALID

[Bug tree-optimization/89582] Suboptimal code generated for floating point struct in -O3 compare to -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89582 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > So compared to the already mitigated PR84101 this one returns in > > (parallel:TI [ > (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg:DF 20 xmm0) > (const_int

[Bug tree-optimization/89582] Suboptimal code generated for floating point struct in -O3 compare to -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89582 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|

[Bug c++/89900] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in check_instantiated_arg)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89900 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- I think that ultimately this boils down to this code in grokdeclarator: if (type_was_error_mark_node && template_parm_flag) /* FIXME we should be able to propagate the error_mark_node as is

  1   2   >