https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89796
--- Comment #4 from Nicholas Krause ---
(In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #3)
> (In reply to Arsène Pérard-Gayot from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #1)
> > > I just compiled this like so:
> > > ./bin/g++ test.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
JunMa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||JunMa at linux dot alibaba.com
--- Comment #10 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89796
--- Comment #3 from Nicholas Krause ---
(In reply to Arsène Pérard-Gayot from comment #2)
> (In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #1)
> > I just compiled this like so:
> > ./bin/g++ test.cpp -fopenmp -Wall -fconcepts -o name test2.cpp
> > an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34311
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89813
Bug ID: 89813
Summary: bogus warning: ’assume_aligned’ is not
an integer constant
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89812
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89803
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, it is a TARGET_AVX512DQ insn, which implies TARGET_AVX, and for
TARGET_AVX there is no difference between nonimmediate_operand and
vector_operand.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89812
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Summary|in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85537
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> The test works for me with 4.8.5. The change occurred between revisions
> r2370089 (2016-06-04, OK) and r237310 + one patch (2016-06-10, wrong code).
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89803
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1)
> > Also we can use constraint "vm" instead of "v" for vfpclassp[sd]
> > instructions.
> >
> > ndex: gcc/config/i386/sse.md
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85537
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Priority|P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85537
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82721
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89812
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89812
Bug ID: 89812
Summary: incorrect maximum in error: requested alignment
‘536870912’ exceeds maximum 2147483648
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89804
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Here is the testcase (and removed use of the headers):
> typedef unsigned long long uint64_t;
>
> uint64_t uint5korr(const unsigned char *p)
> {
> uint64_t res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89804
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89805
Jonny Grant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.6.4
--- Comment #3 from Jonny Grant ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89805
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89805
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.8.5, 7.3.0
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89796
--- Comment #2 from Arsène Pérard-Gayot ---
(In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #1)
> I just compiled this like so:
> ./bin/g++ test.cpp -fopenmp -Wall -fconcepts -o name test2.cpp
> and got this on a build from yesterday:
>
> g++: intern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89806
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Related or a dup of bug 53431.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89811
Bug ID: 89811
Summary: uint32_t load is not recognized if shifts are done in
a fixed-size loop
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71861
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Mar 24 18:08:10 2019
New Revision: 269898
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269898&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fix PR 71861
2019-03-24 Janus Weil
PR fortran/7186
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89810
Bug ID: 89810
Summary: Suboptimal codegen: integer load/assemble from
in-register array of uint8_t
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: misse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89809
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89803
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1)
> Also we can use constraint "vm" instead of "v" for vfpclassp[sd]
> instructions.
>
> ndex: gcc/config/i386/sse.md
> ===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89809
Bug ID: 89809
Summary: movzwl is not utilized when uint16_t is loaded with
bit-shifts (while memcpy does)
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61593
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Sean from comment #7)
> Iain, no. Please see comment #2.
ah gotcha .. then it's a question of producing a general patch rather than a
darwin-specific one and posting it for review (with some suita
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89796
Nicholas Krause changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xerofoify at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61593
--- Comment #7 from Sean ---
Iain, no. Please see comment #2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87761
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87761
--- Comment #18 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sun Mar 24 15:20:52 2019
New Revision: 269896
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269896&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/87761
* regcprop.c (copyprop_hardreg_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80782
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
AFAIK the use of the clang assembler (i.e. calling cctools as which then spawns
clang -cc1as) is working on all open branches (and on the closed 6.5).
please could you be more specific about exactly what's no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Daniel Vollmer from comment #6)
> Is 7.4 or 8.3 new enough to be worthwhile trying?
The specific thing you reported should be fixed on both of those branches.
General support for LTO debug is not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Vollmer ---
Is 7.4 or 8.3 new enough to be worthwhile trying?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61593
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mileston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62001
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68771
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71409
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86912
Nikita Kniazev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nok.raven at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Bug ID: 89808
Summary: Disable "#pragma once in main file"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78865
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 24 12:51:19 2019
New Revision: 269895
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269895&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-03-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/78865
* interfac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89807
Bug ID: 89807
Summary: Incorrect -Wconversion warning when shifting uint32_t
with 24
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89803
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
Created attachment 46015
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46015&action=edit
Add intrinsics and tests.
Add intrinsics and cover tests.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89806
Bug ID: 89806
Summary: Different behaviour for "pragma diagnostic disabled"
between gcc and g++
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89805
Bug ID: 89805
Summary: Not accurate line number -Werror=unused-macros
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
47 matches
Mail list logo
