[Bug c++/89244] __builtin_is_constant_evaluated not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89244 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/88217] [8 Regression] Compile time and memory hog w/ -O2 -fstrict-enums -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-fre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88217 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/88217] [8 Regression] Compile time and memory hog w/ -O2 -fstrict-enums -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-fre

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88217 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 8 07:40:31 2019 New Revision: 268665 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268665&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-08 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug tree-optimization/88149] [7/8 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt since r265959

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88149 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 8 07:40:31 2019 New Revision: 268665 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268665&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-08 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2

[Bug tree-optimization/88427] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have plus_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5617

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88427 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 8 07:40:31 2019 New Revision: 268665 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268665&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-08 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 20

[Bug target/84762] GCC for PowerPC32 violates the SysV ABI spec for small struct returns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84762 Lokesh Janghel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lokeshjanghel91 at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug libbacktrace/78063] libbacktrace fails to handle cross CU DW_AT_abstract_origin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78063 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Fri Feb 8 05:55:44 2019 New Revision: 268663 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268663&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [libbacktrace] Handle DW_FORM_ref_addr Add handling of the DW_FORM_ref_add

[Bug lto/89246] New: LTO produces references to cloned symbols which the compiler failed to clone

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89246 Bug ID: 89246 Summary: LTO produces references to cloned symbols which the compiler failed to clone Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: link

[Bug c++/52830] ICE: "canonical types differ for identical types ..." when attempting SFINAE with member type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/89217] [9 Regression] ICE tree check: expected constructor, have error_mark in split_nonconstant_init_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89217 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek

[Bug c/89051] -Wno-error= does not work for warning groups

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89051 --- Comment #2 from m101010a at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1) > I don't think GCC has an internal representation of warning groups It has to have some representation, because it can tell which warning group is more

[Bug target/89245] New: [MIPS] v1 is assigned in jalr delay slot for later use at -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89245 Bug ID: 89245 Summary: [MIPS] v1 is assigned in jalr delay slot for later use at -Os Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/81552] -finit-integer=n is restricted to 32-bit INTEGER.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81552 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Domin

[Bug fortran/68940] -Wno-error=compare-reals not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68940 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88977] __builtin_is_constant_evaluated() as function template argument causes substitution failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88977 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- I had missed the example is missing a semicolon after the definition of X (the error could use improvement). With the semicolon added, the example is accepted (it's even in the test suite). The equivalent th

[Bug target/87532] bad results from vec_extract(unsigned char, foo) dependent upon function inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87532 --- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt --- Let me take back what I said earlier. We've had full support for vec_extract with a variable second argument for quite a long time. So let me try again responding to comment #4. We have special-case code f

[Bug tree-optimization/89235] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected block, have in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:285

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89235 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86637] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected block, have in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:293

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86637 --- Comment #13 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Feb 7 23:00:18 2019 New Revision: 268659 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268659&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix more ICEs in -fsave-optimization-record (PR tree-optimization/8923

[Bug c++/88977] __builtin_is_constant_evaluated() as function template argument causes substitution failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88977 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/89235] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected block, have in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:285

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89235 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Feb 7 23:00:18 2019 New Revision: 268659 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268659&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix more ICEs in -fsave-optimization-record (PR tree-optimization/89235

[Bug c++/89244] New: __builtin_is_constant_evaluated not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89244 Bug ID: 89244 Summary: __builtin_is_constant_evaluated not documented Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/87532] bad results from vec_extract(unsigned char, foo) dependent upon function inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87532 --- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt --- Hm. Hang on while I look at some history.

[Bug target/69061] Huge (~7GB of them) Static arrays are not fully usable on Darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69061 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/88997] Implicit constructors created with line numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88997 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/89011] member function pointer template argument with initialization by constant generates ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89011 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89050] GCC sometimes requires this to be captured when doing overload resolution but selecting a static member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89050 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/89051] -Wno-error= does not work for warning groups

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89051 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89074] valid pointer equality constexpr comparison rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/82877] negative array index accepted in a pointer difference expression in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82877 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Clang issues the expected errors, as does ICC: $ clang -S pr82877.C pr82877.C:1:15: error: constexpr function never produces a constant expression [-Winvalid-constexpr] constexpr int f ()

[Bug c++/82877] negative array index accepted in a pointer difference expression in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82877 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||7.3.0, 8.2.0, 9.0 --- Comment #1 from Mar

[Bug c++/89149] Out of bounds array access not detected as ill-formed in a constant expression context in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89149 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/89151] SFINAE-disabled member hides another

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89151 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug other/89243] New: ICE in new test case g++.dg/opt/pr89188.C from r268647

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89243 Bug ID: 89243 Summary: ICE in new test case g++.dg/opt/pr89188.C from r268647 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug c/89153] internal compiler error: in assign_stack_local_1, at function.c:409

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89153 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89231] Bogus "ambiguous template instantiation" error for variadic nested class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89231 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/89237] Partial specialization incorrectly marked as ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89237 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/83581] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at internal-fn.c:2397

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83581 --- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Shubham Narlawar from comment #5) > Is this the same bug as above filed? Please don't hijack random PRs resolved w/ proper fixes long ago. There's one open PR filed for an ICE in expand_LOOP_VE

[Bug tree-optimization/89235] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected block, have in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:285

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89235 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00402.html

[Bug tree-optimization/83581] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at internal-fn.c:2397

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83581 --- Comment #6 from Shubham Narlawar --- Created attachment 45637 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45637&action=edit Preprocessed code of file named "work23_crash1.c" internal compiler error: in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at int

[Bug tree-optimization/83581] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at internal-fn.c:2397

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83581 Shubham Narlawar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gsocshubham at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|WAITING

[Bug target/89229] [7/8/9 Regression] Unnecessary ZMM in movoi_internal_avx/movti_internal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89229 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Feb 7 17:58:19 2019 New Revision: 268657 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268657&root=gcc&view=rev Log: i386: Fix typo in *movoi_internal_avx/movti_internal PR ta

[Bug tree-optimization/54855] Unnecessary duplication when performing scalar operation on vector element

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54855 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|kirill.yukhin at intel dot com |hjl.tools at gmail dot com,

[Bug rtl-optimization/89242] New: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 7 should be 5, not 2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89242 Bug ID: 89242 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 7 should be 5, not 2) Product: gcc Version: 9.0

[Bug fortran/52789] gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/78314] [aarch64] ieee_support_halting does not report unsupported fpu traps correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78314 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #22 fr

[Bug fortran/52789] gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 --- Comment #8 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Thu Feb 7 17:40:29 2019 New Revision: 268656 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268656&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-07 Dominique d'Humieres PR fortran/52789

[Bug fortran/89240] Discrepancy in the return kind of MAX and MIN between all literal input parameters and input parameters that are variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/89230] Bogus uninited usage warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89230 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias CC|

[Bug target/87532] bad results from vec_extract(unsigned char, foo) dependent upon function inline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87532 --- Comment #9 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- The new tests proposed by as part of this PR represent illegal code and are properly rejected by the compiler. However, the compiler is not currently rejecting the following test program even thou

[Bug middle-end/89230] Bogus uninited usage warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89230 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/89223] [7/8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in int_cst_value, at tree.c:11226

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89223 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- The #c9 patch looks good, but I don't view #c5 as papering over issues, but rather as an optimization and desirable change. The expansion of ARRAY_REFs is done through calling get_inner_reference and expandi

[Bug c++/89241] [9 Regression] ICE in enclosing_instantiation_of, at cp/pt.c:13380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89241 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Started with that fix, actually: r268424.

[Bug c++/89241] [9 Regression] ICE in enclosing_instantiation_of, at cp/pt.c:13380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89241 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 Summary|ICE in

[Bug c++/89241] ICE in enclosing_instantiation_of, at cp/pt.c:13380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89241 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/86964] Too many debug symbols included, especially for extern globals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86964 --- Comment #6 from Johan.karlsson at enea dot com --- Created attachment 45636 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45636&action=edit Patch to enable skip unused extern variables. I'm attaching a patch that I've been working on.

[Bug c++/89241] New: ICE in enclosing_instantiation_of, at cp/pt.c:13380

nguages=c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 9.0.1 20190207 (experimental) (GCC) /opt/gcc/gcc-9/bin/g++ -c bug3.cpp bug3.cpp: In instantiation of ‘o< >::m_fn3() [with = int]:: [with auto:1 = int; auto:2 = int]’: bug3.cpp:4:27: required by substitution of ‘template decltype (g(1, 2))

[Bug bootstrap/88714] [9 regression] bootstrap comparison failure on armv7l since r265398

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88714 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/89225] [9 Regression] LRA hang on ppc64le compiling glibc starting with r268404

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 --- Comment #18 from Tamar Christina --- Ah no worries, I was just wondering if there was some explicit action that was wanted from me :)

[Bug go/89019] LTO and gccgo cause ICE during free_lang_data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89019 Nikhil Benesch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/89235] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected block, have in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:285

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89235 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 --- Comment #11 from MarkEggleston --- Created attachment 45634 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45634&action=edit Updated change log for gcc/fortran for patch Change no longer affects MAX and MIN.

[Bug bootstrap/84402] [meta] GCC build system: parallelism bottleneck

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402 --- Comment #29 from Giuliano Belinassi --- > No, the proper fix would be to split the generated files and compile them in > parallel. Similarly for all the insn-*.c generated files. That would the > proper fix. Indeed. However, I am working o

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 MarkEggleston changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #45629|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/89234] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in get_eh_region_and_lp_from_rtx at gcc/except.c:1824

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89234 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45632 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45632&action=edit gcc9-pr89234.patch Full untested patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 --- Comment #17 from Bill Seurer --- On 02/07/19 09:47, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 > > Tamar Christina changed: > > What|Removed |Added >

[Bug rtl-optimization/89234] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in get_eh_region_and_lp_from_rtx at gcc/except.c:1824

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89234 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|target

[Bug ipa/88755] [9 Regression] ICE in compute_fn_summary, at ipa-fnsummary.c:2513 since r267601

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88755 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- tp_sum is function that should be inlined. The problem is that its estimated size after inlining a function call within tp_sum is 75. We used to estimate that the speedup for inlining function is large and thus

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 --- Comment #9 from MarkEggleston --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5) > (In reply to MarkEggleston from comment #3) > > Looks like I missed MIN with literals. > > > > integer(2) :: a2 > > integer(4) :: a4 > > write(*,*) kind(max(7, 9

[Bug fortran/89240] New: Discrepancy in the return kind of MAX and MIN between all literal input parameters and input parameters that are variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240 Bug ID: 89240 Summary: Discrepancy in the return kind of MAX and MIN between all literal input parameters and input parameters that are variables Product: gcc Ver

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 --- Comment #8 from MarkEggleston --- (In reply to kargl from comment #7) > (In reply to MarkEggleston from comment #0) > > Created attachment 45626 [details] > > Add GNU extension notes to DIM, MOD, MODULO, MAX and MIN > > > > Missing notes reg

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/89239] gcc claims that this expression is not constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89239 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/89230] Bogus uninited usage warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89230 --- Comment #2 from lavr at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov --- Okay, but "d" points to a clearly separate storage on stack within a local frame. None of the pointers passed to (s)printf() relate to that area (either they are also clearly separate within th

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC|tamar.christina at arm dot com | --- Comment #15 from Tamar Chr

[Bug target/89229] [7/8/9 Regression] Unnecessary ZMM in movoi_internal_avx/movti_internal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89229 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Another problem: (cond [(ior (match_operand 0 "ext_sse_reg_operand") (match_operand 1 "ext_sse_reg_operand")) (const_string "XI") We shouldn't use XI for TARGET_AVX512

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 --- Comment #6 from MarkEggleston --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5) > (In reply to MarkEggleston from comment #3) > > Looks like I missed MIN with literals. > > > > integer(2) :: a2 > > integer(4) :: a4 > > write(*,*) kind(max(7, 9

[Bug tree-optimization/89238] cc1 hangs after

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89238 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/87645] [7 Regression] gcc hangs up on vr_values::vrp_visit_assignment_or_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87645 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 89238 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 --- Comment #14 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I did not add you to the CC list.

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 --- Comment #13 from Tamar Christina --- Hmm? I don't understand Bill Seurer, was there something you wanted me to do here?

[Bug rtl-optimization/89195] [7 regression] Corrupted stack offset after combine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89195 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 regression] Corrupted |[7 regression] Corrupted

[Bug c/89211] [8 Regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode, at stor-layout.c:403

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89211 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89187] [7 Regression] ICE in initialize_argument_information, at calls.c:2023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89187 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE in |[7 Regression] ICE in

[Bug middle-end/89002] [7 Regression] ICE in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.c:3166

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89002 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE in |[7 Regression] ICE in

[Bug target/88965] powerpc64le vector builtin hits ICE in verify_gimple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88965 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88988] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in lookup_name_real_1)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88988 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/88968] [8 Regression] Stack overflow in gimplify_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88968 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/88964] [8 Regression] ICE in wide_int_to_tree_1, at tree.c:1561

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88964 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/88976] [7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2552

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88976 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE in |[7 Regression] ICE in

[Bug bootstrap/84402] [meta] GCC build system: parallelism bottleneck

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402 --- Comment #28 from Segher Boessenkool --- But what version of GCC is this graph, with what exact configuration?

[Bug c++/88949] ICE in expand_expr_real_1, at expr.c:10001 with -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88949 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 8.3+ too.

[Bug target/88906] wrong code with -march=k6 -minline-all-stringops -minline-stringops-dynamically -mmemcpy-strategy=libcall:-1:align and vector argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88906 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 8.3+ too.

[Bug target/88905] [8 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2253 with -mabm and __builtin_popcountll

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88905 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/88901] ICE when using -fsanitize=pointer-compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88901 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/88734] [8 Regression] AArch64's ACLE intrinsics give an ICE instead of compile error when option mismatch.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88734 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88902] ICE: Segmentation fault (in DFS::DFS_write_tree_body)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88902 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   >