[Bug lto/89183] GCC 8 LTO fails on Windows with -g/-g3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89183 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- This is already fixed in the sources and will be included for GCC 8.3. You should ask ARM to backport the fix and have them release a new toolchain since that is where you got the binaries from.

[Bug lto/89183] GCC 8 LTO fails on Windows with -g/-g3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89183 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/88422] collect2.exe: fatal error: lto-wrapper returned 1 exit status: file not recognized: file truncated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88422 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ilg at livius dot net --- Comment #11 fr

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug fortran/77678] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:13706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77678 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #17

[Bug lto/89183] New: GCC 8 LTO fails on Windows with -g/-g3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89183 Bug ID: 89183 Summary: GCC 8 LTO fails on Windows with -g/-g3 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug fortran/88247] [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_array_ctor_var_strlen, at fortran/trans-array.c:2068

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88247 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assigne

[Bug tree-optimization/89182] New: [8/9 Regression] [graphite] ICE in extract_affine, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:280

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89182 Bug ID: 89182 Summary: [8/9 Regression] [graphite] ICE in extract_affine, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:280 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug fortran/83246] internal compiler error or loader problem might be related to a PARAMETER statement being in a BLOCK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83246 --- Comment #7 from urbanjost at comcast dot net --- Thanks!

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 --- Comment #16 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #15) > I still get > > % gfcg charlen_10.f90 > charlen_10.f90:5:39: > > 5 | character(:), allocatable :: x(y)1 ! { dg-error "must have a

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 --- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I still get % gfcg charlen_10.f90 charlen_10.f90:5:39: 5 | character(:), allocatable :: x(y)1 ! { dg-error "must have a deferred shape" } | 1

[Bug tree-optimization/81679] use attribute unused on function arguments as an optimization hint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81679 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug libstdc++/89181] Can std C++ library follow ISO spec parameter names?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89181 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/77678] ICE in fold_read_from_constant_string, at fold-const.c:13706

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77678 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to kargl from comment #6) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > ICE fixed. > > Add -fcheck=all to your command line options. > > With the ICE fixed, I think that this falls

[Bug fortran/78746] charlen_03, charlen_10 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78746 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/21678] Using inline disables warnings about missing return statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21678 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Known to f

[Bug c++/80458] [-Wreturn-type] false negative on missing return statement in a member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80458 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/21678] Using inline disables warnings about missing return statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21678 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||skvadrik at gmail dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug libstdc++/89181] New: Can std C++ library follow ISO spec parameter names?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89181 Bug ID: 89181 Summary: Can std C++ library follow ISO spec parameter names? Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c/78989] Missing -Waddress warning due to -Wno-system-headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78989 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/88834] [SVE] Poor addressing mode choices for LD2 and ST2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88834 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/74765] missing uninitialized warning (parenthesis, TREE_NO_WARNING abuse)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74765 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/85663] [9 Regression]: sanitizer fails to build on mips-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70180] missing -Wpointer-arith on NULL arithmetic cast to a an object type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70180 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- With -Wextra, Clang warns on one of the cases: 70180.cc:3:22: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior if the offset is nonzero [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] void *p = (i

[Bug c++/70180] missing -Wpointer-arith on NULL arithmetic cast to a an object type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70180 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.1.3, 4.3.5, 4.4.7, 4.8.5,

[Bug c++/70181] missing -Wtautological-compare for constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70181 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|6.0 |6.3.0, 7.3.0, 8.2.0, 9.0 --- Comment #3 f

[Bug middle-end/70125] attributes diagnostics missing essential context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70125 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end Known to fail|

[Bug c/69661] missing -Wsequence-point warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69661 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sun Feb 3 22:47:41 2019 New Revision: 268504 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268504&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/69661 - missing -Wsequence-point warning gcc/testsuite.ChangeLog:

[Bug c/69661] missing -Wsequence-point warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69661 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/67759] [4.9 only] Missing warning "makes pointer from integer without a cast" after multiline assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67759 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/66439] Diagnostic on failed function template lookup is missing a line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66439 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/85663] [9 Regression]: sanitizer fails to build on mips-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663 --- Comment #12 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #9) > (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #8) > > The report is misleading regarding version, thus I'm resetting the versions. > > For mips, sanitiz

[Bug c/63886] float will fit into int with abs - possible missing warning Wabsolute-value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63886 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/63518] missing Wuninitialized warning independent of order of arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63518 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/85663] [9 Regression]: sanitizer fails to build on mips-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, no, you are forcing it to ignore that through --enable-libsanitizer. Don't do that for unsupported targets.

[Bug sanitizer/85663] [9 Regression]: sanitizer fails to build on mips-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- That is not really possible, as libsanitizer/configure.tgt in 8.x doesn't support mips at all, only GCC 9 has added: + mips*64*-*-linux*) + # This clause is only here to not match the supported mips*-

[Bug c/89180] New: [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wunused warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180 Bug ID: 89180 Summary: [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wunused warnings Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug ada/89178] equality for composed types failt when a component has a discriminant and redefines equality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89178 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/60212] missing warning for unused variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60212 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Known to f

[Bug sanitizer/85663] [9 Regression]: sanitizer fails to build on mips-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663 --- Comment #9 from Sergei Trofimovich --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #8) > The report is misleading regarding version, thus I'm resetting the versions. > For mips, sanitizer support was neither in gcc-8.0.1 nor gcc-8.1.0 nor >

[Bug c++/46224] Enhancement: Issue warning when matching placement delete operator is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46224 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Vers

[Bug c++/44648] missing -Wunused warning on a const variable in if statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/44648] missing -Wunused warning on a const variable in if statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Sun Feb 3 21:48:27 2019 New Revision: 268503 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268503&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/44648 - missing -Wunused warning on a const variable in if statemen

[Bug c++/44648] missing -Wunused warning on a const variable in if statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.2.0 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug sanitizer/85663] [9 Regression]: sanitizer fails to build on mips-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Version|8.1.0 |unknown Target Milestone|8.3

[Bug c/16804] Function pointer assignment/initialization (missing warning)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16804 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/16093] Bad error messages for missing declarations.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16093 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Known to f

[Bug c/14030] missing parameter count check ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14030 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|7.0 |7.3.0, 8.2.0, 9.0 --- Comment #6 from Mar

[Bug fortran/84394] [7/8 Regression] compiler error when using modules with derived types in block data subprograms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug sanitizer/85663] [8/9 Regression] gcc-8.0.1 regression: sanitizer fails to build on mips-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85663 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Version|8.0.1 |8.1.0 --- Comment #7 from Hans-Pete

[Bug fortran/83700] [Meta-bug] Fortran Coarray issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83700 Bug 83700 depends on bug 84848, which changed state. Bug 84848 Summary: [8/9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/event_3.f08/9 -fcoarray=single -O2 -latomic execution test https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84848 What

[Bug fortran/84848] [8/9 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray/event_3.f08/9 -fcoarray=single -O2 -latomic execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84848 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89179] compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179 --- Comment #12 from Vincent --- Thanks, Andrew.

[Bug c++/89179] compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Vincent from comment #10) > Yes, sorry about that. > Alas, I don't use them... https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction might be a good thing to look into.

[Bug c++/89179] compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179 --- Comment #10 from Vincent --- Yes, sorry about that. Alas, I don't use them...

[Bug c++/89179] compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > You still have not answered my question about precompiled headers? Do you > use them? If so the workaround is not to use them at all. See PR 61250 for informat

[Bug c++/89179] compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- You still have not answered my question about precompiled headers? Do you use them?

[Bug fortran/71935] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE is_c_interoperable(): gfc_simplify_expr failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71935 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING CC|

[Bug c++/89179] compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179 --- Comment #7 from Vincent --- I understand. It might have something to do with 67650, which was been in gcc since 2005, and is fully reproducible until now (8.2.0). It seems to be a memory error too. Sadly, nobody ever gave it a try.

[Bug c++/89179] compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Read https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ . There is nothing we can help you with without any way of trying to reproduce the bug. A crash in ggc_set_mark means one of two things: * Precompiled Headers were used and th

[Bug c/89167] internal compiler error due to mpfr assert at init2.c:52

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89167 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89179] compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179 --- Comment #5 from Vincent --- Hmm, hard to do, it is monumental and contains a ton of stuff I cannot share... Sorry about that, I realize it makes diagnosis quite difficult.

[Bug c++/89179] compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you add -save-temps and attach the preprocessed source?

[Bug c++/89179] compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179 --- Comment #3 from Vincent --- It on MacOS Mojave 10.14.2. The command line options are: /usr/local/bin/g++-8 -c -DNDEBUG -O3 -fvisibility=hidden -Wall -Wextra -pedantic-errors -DDARWIN -std=c++17 -fvisibility-inlines-hidden

[Bug c++/89179] compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Oh what host is this on?

[Bug c++/89179] compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/89166] -static prevents liblto_plugin to be created

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89166 --- Comment #3 from Liviu Ionescu --- I tried all sort of configurations to build static executables, but I could not find one that works while building Windows binaries (with mingw) and still allow the liblto_plugin-0.dll to be created. If the

[Bug fortran/67679] [7/8/9 Regression] -Wunitialized reports on compiler-generated variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67679 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Feb 3 19:38:25 2019 New Revision: 268502 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268502&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-03 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/67679 * trans-ar

[Bug c++/89179] New: compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89179 Bug ID: 89179 Summary: compiler error: in ggc_set_mark, at ggc-page.c:1532 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug ada/89178] New: equality for composed types failt when a component has a discriminant and redefines equality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89178 Bug ID: 89178 Summary: equality for composed types failt when a component has a discriminant and redefines equality Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/86893] implement F202x .andthen. / .orelse. operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86893 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89033] gfortran accepts invalid code in select type construct with pointer assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89033 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89030] gfortran accepts invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89030 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/89071] AVX vcvtsd2ss lets us avoid PXOR dependency breaking for scalar float<->double and other scalar xmm,xmm instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/89071] AVX vcvtsd2ss lets us avoid PXOR dependency breaking for scalar float<->double and other scalar xmm,xmm instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0

[Bug fortran/88393] [7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] Segfault with type-bound assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88393 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88393] [7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] Segfault with type-bound assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88393 --- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 3 18:23:25 2019 New Revision: 268501 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268501&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-03 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/88

[Bug fortran/89092] Host-associated generic used instead of use-associated TBP in call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89092 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/85953] [7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2370

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85953 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/89166] -static prevents liblto_plugin to be created

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89166 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- If you use -static in LDFLAGS, you will have other issues. What are you trying to do? This is like telling the doctor it hurts when I bend my arm the wrong way and then the doctor tells you stop doing that.

[Bug lto/89166] -static prevents liblto_plugin to be created

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89166 --- Comment #1 from Liviu Ionescu --- a related bug is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84995

[Bug target/89071] AVX vcvtsd2ss lets us avoid PXOR dependency breaking for scalar float<->double and other scalar xmm,xmm instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071 --- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #18) > The only remaining question is on cvtsd2ss mem->xmm, where ICC goes with the > same strategy as with other non-conversion SSE unops: > >vmovsdd(%rip), %xmm0 >

[Bug target/89071] AVX vcvtsd2ss lets us avoid PXOR dependency breaking for scalar float<->double and other scalar xmm,xmm instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071 --- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak --- The only remaining question is on cvtsd2ss mem->xmm, where ICC goes with the same strategy as with other non-conversion SSE unops: vmovsdd(%rip), %xmm0 vcvtsd2ss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0 but with cvtss2

[Bug target/89071] AVX vcvtsd2ss lets us avoid PXOR dependency breaking for scalar float<->double and other scalar xmm,xmm instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071 --- Comment #17 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Feb 3 16:48:41 2019 New Revision: 268496 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268496&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/89071 * config/i386/i386.md (*sqrt2_sse

[Bug other/89177] New: unaligned memory access in libphobos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89177 Bug ID: 89177 Summary: unaligned memory access in libphobos Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug fortran/85953] [7 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2370

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85953 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/89071] AVX vcvtsd2ss lets us avoid PXOR dependency breaking for scalar float<->double and other scalar xmm,xmm instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89071 --- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #15) > (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13) > > I assume that memory inputs are not problematic for SSE/AVX {R,}SQRT, RCP > > and ROUND instructions. Contrary to CV

[Bug fortran/88678] [9 regression] Many gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_X.f90 test cases fail starting with r267465

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88678 --- Comment #25 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Feb 3 16:21:06 2019 New Revision: 268493 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268493&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-03 Uroš Bizjak PR libfortran/88678 Re

[Bug libfortran/78314] [aarch64] ieee_support_halting does not report unsupported fpu traps correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78314 --- Comment #21 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Feb 3 16:21:06 2019 New Revision: 268493 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268493&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-03 Uroš Bizjak PR libfortran/88678 Re

[Bug libfortran/78314] [aarch64] ieee_support_halting does not report unsupported fpu traps correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78314 --- Comment #20 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Feb 3 16:19:36 2019 New Revision: 268492 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268492&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-03 Uroš Bizjak PR libfortran/88678 Re

[Bug fortran/88678] [9 regression] Many gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_X.f90 test cases fail starting with r267465

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88678 --- Comment #24 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Feb 3 16:19:36 2019 New Revision: 268492 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268492&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-03 Uroš Bizjak PR libfortran/88678 Re

[Bug fortran/89174] [8/9 Regression] Allocation segfault with CLASS(*) MOLD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89174 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/89176] New: Vectorizer fails to consider narrower vector width for res[i] = v1[i] < v2[i] ? v2[i] : v1[i]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89176 Bug ID: 89176 Summary: Vectorizer fails to consider narrower vector width for res[i] = v1[i] < v2[i] ? v2[i] : v1[i] Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/89175] New: gcc's conversion code from double to unsigned int handles overflows incorrectly on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89175 Bug ID: 89175 Summary: gcc's conversion code from double to unsigned int handles overflows incorrectly on x86-64 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/88980] [9 regression] segfault on allocatable string member assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88980 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 88980, which changed state. Bug 88980 Summary: [9 regression] segfault on allocatable string member assignment https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88980 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/88685] [8/9 regression] pointer class array argument indexing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88685 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88393] [7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] Segfault with type-bound assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88393 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 3 14:50:07 2019 New Revision: 268489 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268489&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-03 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/88

[Bug fortran/88980] [9 regression] segfault on allocatable string member assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88980 --- Comment #4 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Feb 3 14:44:19 2019 New Revision: 268488 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268488&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2019-02-02 Paul Thomas Backport from trunk PR fortran/88

  1   2   >