https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88646
gianni at mariani dot ws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88510
Devin Hussey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|GCC generates inefficient |GCC generates inefficient
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88646
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88646
Bug ID: 88646
Summary: Optimizer failure on integer sum overflow cast to bool
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71613
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anders.granlund.0 at gmail dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88625
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88623
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
gcc/ is not libgcc. libgcc is only ever built using exactly the same
version of GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88584
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
This looks like a case that was missed in, or broken by, my fix for bug
13801, which was supposed to address such cases of entities with different
(compatible) types in different scopes. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88582
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
The unqualified version of _Atomic int is _Atomic int; references to
qualified or unqualified versions of a type do not by default include the
type with _Atomic added or removed (see 6.2.5#
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88575
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018, bugzi...@poradnik-webmastera.com wrote:
> In test() gcc is not able to determine that for a==b it does not have to
> evaluate 2nd comparison and can use value of a if 1s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88645
--- Comment #1 from MCCCS ---
Typo: fix can be added to "decl_with_nonnull_addr_p"
of "/c-family/c-common.c" if anyone is interested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88645
Bug ID: 88645
Summary: Don't assume functions are always nonnull if there's
__attribute__((weak_import)), similar to
__attribute__((weak))
Product: gcc
Version: 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86952
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84072
Bug 84072 depends on bug 86952, which changed state.
Bug 86952 Summary: Avoid jump table for switch statement with
-mindirect-branch=thunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86952
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86814, which changed state.
Bug 86814 Summary: xtensa port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86814
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86814
jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86814
--- Comment #1 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jcmvbkbc
Date: Mon Dec 31 16:51:36 2018
New Revision: 267488
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267488&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86814
Xtensa architecture is not affected by sp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82313
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86315
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82995
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82995
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Dec 31 14:59:46 2018
New Revision: 267487
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267487&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-31 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/82995
* trans-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88644
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-*-darwin*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88644
Bug ID: 88644
Summary: Unexpected pub type info eliminated after r 246973
(causes pubtypes-*.c to regress).
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88643
Bug ID: 88643
Summary: -Wl,--wrap not supported with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88582
Anders Granlund changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88642
Bug ID: 88642
Summary: Accepts ill-formed program with invalid scalar
initialization syntax.
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88641
Bug ID: 88641
Summary: crtstuff.c ctors/dtors list breaks with
-fdata-sections
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86952
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
H.J. : Can you please run updated benchmark on a recent machine and provide
slow down numbers for that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88430
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88616
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2018-12-28 00:00:0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88640
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
31 matches
Mail list logo
