https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87776
Bug ID: 87776
Summary: [9 Regression] Compile time hog during RPO VN
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-time-hog
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77428
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> > > Created attachment 39528 [details]
> > > tentative patch
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71176
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #2)
> (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1)
> > I wonder why GCC -Wformat does not catch this, since "static const char"
> > literals contents should be v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85035
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 44912
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44912&action=edit
assembly language output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85035
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84823
A. Wilcox (awilfox) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77796
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87771
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87775
Bug ID: 87775
Summary: error due __builtin_fprintf having the wrong type
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87774
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87774
Bug ID: 87774
Summary: ICE on ternary expression with __builtin_fprintf
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87773
Bug ID: 87773
Summary: %s directive argument is null missing inlining context
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80024
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80024
--- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Sat Oct 27 21:34:43 2018
New Revision: 265561
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265561&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-27 Sandra Loosemore
PR target/80024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87741
--- Comment #6 from Дилян Палаузов ---
I have misspelled the domain — gnu.gcc.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70914
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87770
ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87771
--- Comment #1 from Donna Ory ---
I'm not a programmer, or anything like that, so I wouldn't know the first thing
about adding code or changing it.
That said, I just want my Tevo Flash to work as it should before I made the
mistake.
If I need t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87772
Bug ID: 87772
Summary: Crash with variadic template, constexpr constructor
for templated non-literal type, using declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87701
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I have a patch.
rtl.texi has this to say about subregs of hard regs:
===
@item hard registers
It is seldom necessary to wrap hard registers in @code{subreg}s; such
registers would normally reduce to a s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87701
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87701
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I see the problem. Mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87771
Bug ID: 87771
Summary: My first 3d printer, and I messed up trying to update
the .ini file. So, I'm trying to put the original
software back in it, and I get this error
Prod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87701
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2018-10-23 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
--- Comment #65 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Iain: This is fine for trunk and all open branches you want it on. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #64 from Iain Sandoe
x
gcc version 9.0.0 20181027 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-c' '-shared-libgcc' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64'
/home/sage/ppl/bin4/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.0.0/cc1plus -quiet -v
-imultiarch x86_64-linux-gnu -D_GNU_SOURCE equals
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85896
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86907
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86907
--- Comment #10 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #9)
> This makes the error message a litte bit clearer, to make sure
> it is understood that this is the compiler's fault, not the user's.
>
> However, I cannot repro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
Douglas Mencken changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44902|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
--- Comment #62 from Douglas Mencken ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #61)
> Created attachment 44908 [details]
> Proposed 8.x patch
>
> here is the revised patch for the post wi::int_traits world. Works For Me(tm)
>
> Please confirm f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86907
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koeni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86907
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Oct 27 10:26:23 2018
New Revision: 265559
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265559&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-27 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/86907
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #4 from Jeremy Sanders ---
Janne: This problem is also present on version 7, whereas the other bug is new
in 8. There may be a relation, however.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87106
--- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Arthur O'Dwyer from comment #10)
> Here's the commit where I trivially-relocatable-ized `std::deque`. 34 lines
> added, 18 more lines changed. There's some duplication, but it's not
> literally "d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85410
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
Testcase from #c2 doesn't fail for me anymore w/ the current trunk snapshot (as
of r265361), but the following one does:
int py, up;
void
ro (int *tr, int et)
{
while (et < 1)
{
int s7 = !!*tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87701
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #44901|0 |1
is obsolete|
39 matches
Mail list logo
