https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.2.1, 9.0
Summary|[6/7/8/9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 24 06:53:57 2018
New Revision: 265453
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265453&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87665
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 24 06:52:45 2018
New Revision: 265452
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265452&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87665
Logicom | Autodesk
Make your AutoCad Experience More Awesome with HP Z Workstation!
https://gfcmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/18.10.12-adsk_hp.pdf
email: market...@logicom-me.net (mailto:market...@logicom-me.net) Tel: (+961)
1 698 220 (tel:+9611698220)
Dekwaneh, Industrial Zone, Maurice Jab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87707
Martin Diehl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59658
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> But it might be misleading (similar to -O0 vs -O2) - enabling for example
> -ftree-pre won't enable PRE for -Og as it has a completely different
> pass pipeline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87719
Bug ID: 87719
Summary: missing warning on printf %s and unterminated array
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87716
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87716
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
A slightly older compiler gave
test1:
movdqa (%rdi), %xmm2
pavgb (%rsi), %xmm2
movdqa %xmm2, %xmm3
punpckhbw %xmm1, %xmm2
punpcklbw %xmm1, %xmm3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63900
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Head ---
I had to use slightly different code because I only have an ARM cross-compiler
version 8.2.0 installed, so I used this:
void g(unsigned char x);
struct MyStruct {
char foo[8];
};
unsigned char b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87718
Bug ID: 87718
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-concatv2si-1.c
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87717
Bug ID: 87717
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-concatv2si-1.c scan-assembler
vpunpckldq[^\n\r]*%xmm17[^\n\r]*%xmm16[^\n\r]*%xmm3
Product: gcc
Dear Business Partner,
ProCons4IT team in Lebanon is glad to schedule a demo of SAP Business One
complete ERP software solution at your offices to showcase how it can help you
cope with digital transformation.
ProCons 4IT is the largest SAP Business One partner in Middle East and TOP 10
gl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87716
Bug ID: 87716
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr57193.c
scan-assembler-times movdqa 2
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
No, doesn't ring bells. But I have some more input:
I couldn't get it to fail on powerpc64-linux.
It fails on powerpc64le-linux only if the second file is compiled with -O0.
As output I get just
$ ./
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87690
--- Comment #6 from Alex Bradbury ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #4)
> I think the intent of the second rule is that float values are passed in the
> same regs as an integer value, and that it wasn't the intent that the
> promotion rule
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87690
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Waterman ---
FWIW, I agree with your last paragraph
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:54 AM wilson at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87690
>
> Jim Wilson cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87690
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87648
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Some more food for thought - what if there is only a single iteration?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87689
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87715
Bug ID: 87715
Summary: problems with asan and -O3 build of ada
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87661
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
--- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Thanks Douglas, no that is fine of course :-) What I wanted to know is, does
it fail for the newest versions as well. So it appears it does. Which Ryan
already said but I have trouble reading apparen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87691
--- Comment #9 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Patch submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg01459.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87714
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r249323.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87714
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87714
Bug ID: 87714
Summary: [8 regresion] ICE on valid C++ code: in
type_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.c:25178
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
--- Comment #9 from Douglas Mencken ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> Is this on all (PowerPC) Darwin? Only one some versions? Which, then?
I am really not going to check it on OS X 10.0 or OS X Beta, or even OS X 10.2.
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87661
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Oct 23 19:02:29 2018
New Revision: 265439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/87661
runtime: remove unused armArch, hwcap and h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85669
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Is this on all (PowerPC) Darwin? Only one some versions? Which, then?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87713
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
CC|
- This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. -
Dear customer,
Some Important data's on your Citizens profile has been missing.To Protect
you,We have temporarily locked your account.Please,Kindly take a moment to
update and have your account restored
UPDATE YOUR INFORMA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87713
Bug ID: 87713
Summary: single character underlined in an error message
instead of the whole token
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87690
--- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson ---
As far as I know, combined tree builds for RISC-V have never worked. When
using a combined tree build, configure makes assumptions about gas/ld features
instead of doing run-time gas/ld checks. Because of our
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87702
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> _IO_vfscanf_internal (s=0xc068, format=0x80ae357
> "%llu%llu%u%u%u%u%u%u%llu%llu%u%u%u%u%u%u",
> argpt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87702
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4)
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0xf7e24064 in __run_exit_handlers (status=1, listp=0xf7fca3fc
> <__exit_funcs>, run_list_atexit=true, run_dtor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87633
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87702
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> (In reply to Mihail Zenkov from comment #2)
> > I'm not sure how to reproduce this regressions without rebuilding glibc. But
> > I can provide prebuilded glibc for te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87712
--- Comment #3 from Barry Revzin ---
Didn't realize the OP had filed a bug report already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87702
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Mihail Zenkov from comment #2)
> I'm not sure how to reproduce this regressions without rebuilding glibc. But
> I can provide prebuilded glibc for test.
>
> http://www.knk.uwebweb.com/glibc-segfau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87709
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87712
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87712
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87712
Bug ID: 87712
Summary: class template argument deduction fails with wrapped
parentheses
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87699
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86687
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86687
--- Comment #17 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Oct 23 17:16:55 2018
New Revision: 265431
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265431&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
backport "[c++] Fix DECL_BY_REFERENCE of clone parms"
Consider test.C com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87702
--- Comment #2 from Mihail Zenkov ---
I'm not sure how to reproduce this regressions without rebuilding glibc. But I
can provide prebuilded glibc for test.
http://www.knk.uwebweb.com/glibc-segfault.tar.xz
To reproduce just unpack and run ./test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87711
Bug ID: 87711
Summary: ICE in gfc_trans_transfer, at fortran/trans-io.c:2676
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278
--- Comment #19 from G. Steinmetz ---
Adding a "parameter" attribute :
$ cat z8.f90
program p
type t
real :: a
real :: b = 2.0
end type
type(t), parameter :: z = t(4.0, 5.0)
data z%a /3.0/
end
$ cat z9.f90
program p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278
--- Comment #18 from G. Steinmetz ---
Update and simplified a bit, ICEs down to at least version 5 :
$ cat z1.f90
module m
type t
sequence
real :: a
real :: b = 2.0
end type
type(t) :: z
data z%a /3.0/
end
$ cat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40678
--- Comment #5 from G. Steinmetz ---
Following program compiles smoothly and runs ...
Invocations of function h need obligatoric parenthesis, and a dummy.
On the other hand, "implicit none" would force variable h to be
explicitly declared.
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40678
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #4 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87710
--- Comment #4 from Дилян Палаузов ---
Moved to
for ld.bfd: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23811
for ld.gold: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23812
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87710
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87710
--- Comment #2 from Дилян Палаузов ---
I tried this with -fuse-ld=gold and -fuse-ld=bfd .
If you mean the problem is in both ld.bfd and ld.gold, I will report it there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87710
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The linker is part of binutils. not gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87704
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Oct 23 15:55:05 2018
New Revision: 265429
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265429&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/87704 fix unique_ptr(nullptr_t) constructors
Using a delega
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87709
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops, I missed the first line of the diagnostic. The error from trunk is:
ctad.cc:11:12: error: missing template arguments after 'lit'
11 | auto r2 = (lit(0)) + lit(0);
|^~~
ctad.cc:2:8: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86439
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87698
--- Comment #6 from Romain Geissler ---
Versions of gcc and ld:
> gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 8.2.1 20181011
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87698
--- Comment #5 from Romain Geissler ---
Reduced test case:
> cat test.c
void f() {}
> cat test2.c
void f();
void g()
{
f();
}
> cat test.ver
{
local: *;
};
> gcc -g -flto -ffat-lto-objects -fPIC -o test.fat-objects.o -c test.c
> gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87709
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87710
Bug ID: 87710
Summary: Explicitly mentioned libraries by -lx are not in the
DT_NEEDED list
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87527
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oh sorry, you provided that message yourself. That assertion is there to
enforce the precondition you found.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87527
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
$ g++ -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS uniform_real.cc
$ ./a.out
a.out: uniform_real.cc:13: int main(): Assertion `x >= low && x < high' failed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87704
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Oct 23 15:29:03 2018
New Revision: 265428
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265428&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/87704 fix unique_ptr(nullptr_t) constructors
Using a delega
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87697
--- Comment #3 from jynelson at email dot sc.edu ---
Created attachment 44884
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44884&action=edit
Casting unrelated types gives an error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87697
--- Comment #2 from jynelson at email dot sc.edu ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> (In reply to jynelson from comment #0)
> > Casting a base class to a derived class gives no warning, even with -Wall
> > -Werror enabled. I've bee
Secure Messaging Notification
You have been sent a secure message by Keystone Human Services.
It has been classified as sensitive and may only be accessed from within this
Secure Messaging service.
View the message by clicking here:
https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/P8GbCyPJmPtkM4XTZrW6j
If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87707
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86687
--- Comment #16 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Oct 23 15:06:17 2018
New Revision: 265427
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265427&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
backport "[c++] Fix DECL_BY_REFERENCE of clone parms"
Consider test.C com
Secure Messaging Password Notification
This is a password notification message for the Keystone Human Services Secure
Messaging service.
You received this notification for one of the following reasons:
1. You have been sent a secure message.
2. The system administrator has arranged access to t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86687
--- Comment #15 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Oct 23 15:01:12 2018
New Revision: 265426
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265426&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
backport "[c++] Fix DECL_BY_REFERENCE of clone parms"
Consider test.C com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87709
Bug ID: 87709
Summary: c++17 class template argument deduction not working in
a very specific case
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87708
Bug ID: 87708
Summary: ira-shrinkwrap-prep-[12].c testcases fail after
r265398
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87707
Bug ID: 87707
Summary: actual argument to assumed type dummy argument (i.e.
type(*)) cannot have type-bound procedures
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87527
Fergus Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87702
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Please provide the (preferrably small) self contained runtime testcase that
exposes the bug. Some instructions can be found on [1].
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c b/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
index 4b3711442e6..a24e1853e03 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
@@ -210,16 +210,26 @@ vect_preserves_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87704
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Oct 23 13:10:26 2018
New Revision: 265423
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265423&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/87704 fix unique_ptr(nullptr_t) constructors
Using a delega
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Known to work|7.3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
C testcase that is miscompiled:
struct X { long x; long y; };
struct X a[1024], b[1024];
void foo ()
{
for (int i = 0; i < 1024; ++i)
{
long tem = a[i].x;
a[i].x = 0;
b[i].x = tem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87705
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87706
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87706
Bug ID: 87706
Summary: Inlined functions trigger invalid -Wmissing-profile
warning
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87705
Bug ID: 87705
Summary: Compilation error when dealing with sub derived types
Product: gcc
Version: 8.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Correction, on both x86_64 and ppc64le it requires all of:
-fstrict-aliasing -ftree-loop-vectorize -ftree-sra -ftree-ch -ftree-forwprop
-ftree-copy-prop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87608
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87105
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
The code is now better but not vectorized due to mentioned issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87665
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
On x86_64 it fails with -O1 -fstrict-aliasing -ftree-loop-vectorize
It still fails if every -fno-xxx option for -O1 is added except
-fno-tree-copy-prop so it seems to require:
-fstrict-aliasing -ftree-lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87105
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 23 11:34:56 2018
New Revision: 265421
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265421&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87105
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87608
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 23 11:34:56 2018
New Revision: 265421
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265421&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-23 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87105
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87704
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
C++17 doesn't have the defect, it appears to have been fixed as an unintended
consequence of https://wg21.link/lwg2801
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87704
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
