https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84496
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71450
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72782
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87572
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87599
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87600
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Oh btw, the #c3 problem isn't new at all, it happens with 4.8 already for
example.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87600
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Here is an example for aarch64:
===
long f(long x)
{
register long a asm("x0");
asm("bla %0 %1" : "+&r"(a) : "r"(x));
return a;
}
===
The first asm operand is a local register v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87599
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Oct 14 20:39:05 2018
New Revision: 265151
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265151&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Add register source to movddup
Add register source to movddu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87572
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Oct 14 20:30:02 2018
New Revision: 265150
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265150&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Also disable AVX512IFMA/AVX5124FMAPS/AVX5124VNNIW
Also disab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81376
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81376
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58618
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65657
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Also duplicate of PR86635, aleady assigned to Senthil.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 86635 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86635
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.creekmore@synapse-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87376
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86635
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
*** Bug 87376 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87608
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1)
> Note the compiler can evaluate the initialization loop and then also
> evaluate the effect of static_sort1 call, so the testcase might give
> misleading resul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83927
--- Comment #3 from Adam Hirst ---
In reference to my initial attachment 43173, and by adding the following
annotations:
```
! case 1
M = v_array_par(1)%MyFunc()
print *, M
! case 2
M = v_scalar_par%MyFunc()
print *, M
! case 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87608
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83146
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83146
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Oct 14 09:25:13 2018
New Revision: 265148
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=265148&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-14 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83146
* gfortran.dg/as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87606
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84142
--- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org ---
Test case 3 fails with 9.0.0 20180927:
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 9.0.0 20180927 (experimental) (x86_64-apple-darwin15) Assert_Failure
atree.adb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84198
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at pushface dot org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52365
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87599
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov ---
Never mind, I was misunderstanding the effect of your patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87599
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov ---
But note that even with -mavx, gcc still uses movddup, even though the second
alternative has vpunpcklqdq with a register source.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87288
--- Comment #10 from bin cheng ---
Hmm, should this be backported to GCC8? It was reported against 8 branch.
Thanks.
30 matches
Mail list logo
