[Bug c++/71003] __extension__ silences pedwarn for "\e" in C but not in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71003 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1) > Confirmed. The manual says clearly that it should work so this is a G++ bug. > > '-Wpedantic' does not cause warning messages for use of the alternate > keywords

[Bug objc/80912] enhancement: -Wundeclared-selector improvements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80912 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/86111] ICE in gfc_arith_concat, at fortran/arith.c:985

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86111 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/86111] ICE in gfc_arith_concat, at fortran/arith.c:985

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86111 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Oct 6 22:41:06 2018 New Revision: 264902 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264902&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-10-06 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/86111 Backport f

[Bug c++/87543] New: Missed opportunity to compute constant return value at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87543 Bug ID: 87543 Summary: Missed opportunity to compute constant return value at compile time Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/87540] Missed inner loop hoist if the loop does not depend on outer loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87540 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|U

[Bug c++/87542] [7/8/9 Regression] bogus error on attribute format with a named constant argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87542 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Summary|bogus er

[Bug c++/87542] New: bogus error on attribute format with a named constant argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87542 Bug ID: 87542 Summary: bogus error on attribute format with a named constant argument Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug c++/87541] ]7/8 Regression] ICE using a constant decl as an attribute alloc_size argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87541 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|UNCO

[Bug c++/87541] New: ICE using a constant decl as an attribute alloc_size argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87541 Bug ID: 87541 Summary: ICE using a constant decl as an attribute alloc_size argument Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug tree-optimization/87540] New: Missed inner loop hoist if the loop does not depend on outer loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87540 Bug ID: 87540 Summary: Missed inner loop hoist if the loop does not depend on outer loop Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/87156] [9 Regression] ICE building libstdc++ for mips64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87156 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/86111] ICE in gfc_arith_concat, at fortran/arith.c:985

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86111 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Oct 6 18:20:14 2018 New Revision: 264900 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264900&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-10-06 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/86111 * gfortran

[Bug c/86418] warn about mismatch in type between argument and parameter type for declaration without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86418 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/86418] warn about mismatch in type between argument and parameter type for declaration without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86418 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c/82922] Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K&R style is obsolescent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- I posted a GCC 9 patch here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg00675.html It adds -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wall. Unfortunately, it got derailed by (IMO unsubstantiated) concerns about the impact

[Bug target/87510] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1155

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87510 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/44317] ,##__VA_ARGS__ comma not eaten with -std=c++0x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44317 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment

[Bug c/82922] Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K&R style is obsolescent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3) > Incremental patch for the testsuite: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg00962.html > > Unfortunately it sounds like it might be too late to enable th

[Bug c/86418] warn about mismatch in type between argument and parameter type for declaration without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86418 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug bootstrap/39849] segfault for '__divtf3' during bootstrap and non-bootstrap install

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39849 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/38667] gcc 4.3.2 build fails to create/link libgcc in SLES9 32-bit platform

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38667 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/62269] m32c-elf libgcc fails to configure- setjmp/longjmp exception check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62269 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dj at redhat dot com Assignee|

[Bug target/54429] [SH] SImode values get ferried through FPUL and FP regs for -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54429 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/83999] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:10233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83999 --- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sat Oct 6 15:14:29 2018 New Revision: 264899 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264899&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-10-06 Paul Thomas PR fortran/83999 * resolve.c (re

[Bug fortran/84109] ICE in adjustl on allocatable array of strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84109 --- Comment #7 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Thomas, I am going to apply a cumulative deferred character patch to 8-branch just as soon as the dust has settled on trunk. Cheers Paul On Sat, 6 Oct 2018 at 12:56, tkoenig at g

[Bug fortran/65677] Incomplete assignment on deferred-length character variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677 --- Comment #8 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- I am trying to run out. I was stung by some of the comments in the standards survey about quality of implementation in all brands. This came out as one of the worst for gfortran so I de

[Bug fortran/83999] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:10233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83999 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/83999] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:10233

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83999 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- For some reason, the array spec is not set for the symbol for z1.f90: (gdb) p sym->as $11 = (gfc_array_spec *) 0x0 (gdb) p sym->name $12 = 0x7734d0b8 "f" (with a breakpoint in resolve_fl_procedure).

[Bug fortran/72709] Incorrect assignment of allocatable character array used as component of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 72709, which changed state. Bug 72709 Summary: Incorrect assignment of allocatable character array used as component of derived type https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72709 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 65677, which changed state. Bug 65677 Summary: Incomplete assignment on deferred-length character variable https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/65677] Incomplete assignment on deferred-length character variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/87239] ICE in deferred-length string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87239 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 87239, which changed state. Bug 87239 Summary: ICE in deferred-length string https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87239 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] [F03] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 84109, which changed state. Bug 84109 Summary: ICE in adjustl on allocatable array of strings https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84109 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/84109] ICE in adjustl on allocatable array of strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84109 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/84640] gcc/fortran/simplify.c:2587:9: runtime error: pointer index expression with base 0x0000090de160 overflowed to 0xffffffffc0632960

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84640 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 84640, which changed state. Bug 84640 Summary: gcc/fortran/simplify.c:2587:9: runtime error: pointer index expression with base 0x090de160 overflowed to 0xc0632960 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug fortran/84640] gcc/fortran/simplify.c:2587:9: runtime error: pointer index expression with base 0x0000090de160 overflowed to 0xffffffffc0632960

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84640 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sat Oct 6 11:45:05 2018 New Revision: 264898 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264898&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-10-06 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/84640 * simplif

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #53 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #51) > 2. Locations within strings expanded from a macro (2) should also be fixed for gcc 9 by r264887: /tmp/foo.c: In function ‘foo’: /tmp/foo.c:2:25: warning

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 --- Comment #52 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #51) > 1. C++ does not work C++ should be fixed for gcc 9 by r264887.

[Bug c++/87539] internal compiler error when compiling project with Os optimization flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87539 --- Comment #1 from r4sas --- Created attachment 44798 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44798&action=edit compressed preprocessed file

[Bug c++/87539] New: internal compiler error when compiling project with Os optimization flag

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87539 Bug ID: 87539 Summary: internal compiler error when compiling project with Os optimization flag Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/54429] [SH] SImode values get ferried through FPUL and FP regs for -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54429 --- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #9) > (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #8) > > BTW, the problem is also there when using LRA. > > Is this still the case? Just checked it on trunk. Yes, nothing has