https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85716
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at codesourcery dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85716
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56572
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77502
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77370
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #0)
> > GCC rejects the program below because it tries to initialize the non-const
> > reference object cr with a temporary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80144
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81178
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71138
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70125
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
I see you've been working on attribute diagnostics again lately; any progress
on this one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26190
--- Comment #7 from Jim Wilson ---
I didn't realize it was assigned to me. I changed it to unassigned.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #8)
> Paul, I'm adding you to the CC in the hope that the analysis
> in comment#7 might help you towards a solution that is
> glaringly obvious to you (but not to me :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87482
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I expect it's valid to use (void) if that particular IFUNC resolver
doesn't use the HWCAP information passed, even if the HWCAP information is
passed to resolvers on that architecture. And
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26190
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #5)
> I haven't done any further work on this.
The reason I was asking was because this bug shows up in my search of bugs with
an assignee but that aren't marked as ASSIG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87482
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81824
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Actually the patch is better expressed as:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
index a2beb7fc90a..4710b7d2975 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
One can get around the error with a patch like this:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
index a2beb7fc90a..6b6e34c0d86 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87484
Bug ID: 87484
Summary: internal compiler error: in dwf_regno, at
dwarf2cfi.c:909
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26190
--- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson ---
I haven't done any further work on this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87483
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64525
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87478
Olivier Kannengieser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||okannen at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66074
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56868
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26190
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38629
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54005
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63776
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52357
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56386
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
> Related test case by the bug reporterm
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/
> UvBX1kfuFqs
>
>
> This time rejectin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64196
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87483
Bug ID: 87483
Summary: attribute alias accepted on a symbol definition
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85948
--- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant ---
Great work Manuel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56789
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Ah, I see where the problem is.
Consider the test case
module zero
implicit none
contains
subroutine foo(a)
real, contiguous :: a(:,:)
print *,a
end subroutine foo
subroutine bar(a)
real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87482
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Yes, on some platforms the resolver takes the HWCAP as an argument and so
should be declared as a function taking that argument (if it uses it,
anyway).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69431
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69431
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #5 from Carl Love ---
Cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69431
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69431
Carl Love changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carll at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69431
--- Comment #2 from Carl Love ---
Author: carll
Date: Mon Oct 1 15:57:13 2018
New Revision: 264764
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264764&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Update, forgot to put the PR number in the Change Log.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018
style="color:rgb(31,78,121)">Hi,
style="color:rgb(31,78,121)">
style="color:rgb(31,78,121)">Hope this note finds you
well.
style="color:rgb(31,78,121)">
style="color:rgb(31,78,121)">Are you in the market to target AWS/Azure
users for your lead generation and mark
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87482
Bug ID: 87482
Summary: Clarify behaviour of resolvers with parameters in for
__attribute__((ifunc))
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87473
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Reproduces on trunk for powerpc64le-linux-gnu also.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Oct 1 14:27:17 2018
New Revision: 264759
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264759&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/65677
* trans-expr.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87480
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.3
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87481
Bug ID: 87481
Summary: Endless loop with optimisation in C++17
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87480
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87480
Bug ID: 87480
Summary: SFINAE constructor not matched, only in templated
function
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87366
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87479
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87474
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc |powerpc*-*-*
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87473
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |wschmidt at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87474
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70792
--- Comment #7 from Matthijs van Duin ---
Ah! I should have checked the actual tests of 51253 before calling it a
regression, apologies. I just kinda assumed that these simple cases would be
covered by the work done back then.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87478
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Confirmed, not a regression. Reduced:
template struct is_int { };
template<> struct is_int { using type = void; };
class MyTag {};
template struct is_tag { };
template<> struct is_tag { using type = void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87478
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 12:49:35 2018
New Revision: 264747
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264747&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Updated stack-clash implementation supporting 64k probes.
This patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87479
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87469
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84191
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |ice-on-valid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87465
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 1 13:10:48 2018
New Revision: 264758
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264758&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-01 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/87465
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87465
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||9.0
Summary|[8/9 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83372
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely ---
So is this fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 13:05:30 2018
New Revision: 264754
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264754&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Cleanup the AArch64 testsuite when stack-clash is on.
This patch cle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 13:03:31 2018
New Revision: 264753
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264753&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Set default values for stack-clash and do basic validation in back-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 13:02:21 2018
New Revision: 264752
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264752&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Allow setting of stack-clash via configure options.
This patch defin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 13:00:58 2018
New Revision: 264751
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264751&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Ensure that outgoing argument size is at least 8 bytes when alloca an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 12:58:21 2018
New Revision: 264750
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264750&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a hook to support telling the mid-end when to probe the stack.
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87476
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 12:56:40 2018
New Revision: 264749
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264749&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add support for SVE stack clash probing.
This patch adds basic suppo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86486
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Mon Oct 1 12:53:34 2018
New Revision: 264748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264748&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
stack-clash: Add LR assert to layout_frame.
Since stack clash depend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70792
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2017-08-24 00:00:00 |2018-10-1
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87479
Bug ID: 87479
Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr63527.c
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253
--- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There's no regression (see bug 70792 comment 5).
G++ still warns for the testcasese here, even though it produces the right code
now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70792
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Matthijs van Duin from comment #4)
> It seems bug 51253 previously addressed this, which means this is a
> regression.
No. To be a regression it has to have previously worked, then stopped wor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65667
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87478
Bug ID: 87478
Summary: Hidden member function falsely takes part in qualified
name lookup
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug 87477 depends on bug 38936, which changed state.
Bug 38936 Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585
Bug 20585 depends on bug 38936, which changed state.
Bug 38936 Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44044
Bug 44044 depends on bug 38936, which changed state.
Bug 38936 Summary: [F03] ASSOCIATE construct / improved SELECT TYPE (a=>expr)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38936
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87359
Jürgen Reuter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87473
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41599
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87476
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87475
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87261
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87261
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 1 11:25:45 2018
New Revision: 264744
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264744&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-10-01 MCC CS
PR tree-optimization/87261
* match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87477
Bug ID: 87477
Summary: [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE
statement
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87442
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87476
Bug ID: 87476
Summary: [9 Regression] char-array initialized from wide-string
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87453
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Great, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87373
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84039
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87453
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87472
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mark at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
