[Bug tree-optimization/85597] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85597 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattwi at fysik dot dtu.dk --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/87458] fma and -O3 wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87458 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/70863] [F03] Finalization of array of derived type causes segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70863 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- Commen

[Bug fortran/65347] [F03] Final subroutine not called for function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65347 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- Commen

[Bug fortran/71798] [OOP] failure to finalise temporary

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71798 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- Commen

[Bug fortran/87459] New: -Wunused-variable: False positive for associated variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87459 Bug ID: 87459 Summary: -Wunused-variable: False positive for associated variables Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug target/86684] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86684 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/87195] ICE in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.c:3637

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87195 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86987] ICE in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.c:3515 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86987 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- *** Bug 87195 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/87033] The compiler does not generate the LWAX instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87033 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/87033] The compiler does not generate the LWAX instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87033 --- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Sep 28 00:32:46 2018 New Revision: 264686 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264686&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport pr 87033 to gcc 7 Added: branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/tes

[Bug c/87447] Missing -Wconversion warning in implicit conversion of unsigned long long to double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87447 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/70477] -Wtautological-compare too aggressive?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70477 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug c++/87364] Pretty print of enumerator never prints the id, always falls back to C-style cast output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87364 --- Comment #5 from Will Wray --- re: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-02/msg9.html discussion on removing literal suffixes from Integral constants (part a bigger conversation I'll pick up on below). That change brought GCC into line with cla

[Bug target/87133] ICE in aggregate_value_p with -frounding-math on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87133 --- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool --- This should be fixed on trunk now. Martin, can you please check that?

[Bug target/87149] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87149 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- Should be fixed on trunk now.

[Bug c/70477] -Wtautological-compare too aggressive?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70477 Petr Vandrovec changed: What|Removed |Added CC||petr at vandrovec dot name --- Comment

[Bug target/87033] The compiler does not generate the LWAX instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87033 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.4

[Bug c++/86465] C++17 triggers: ‘’ may be used uninitialized in this function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86465 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Roskin --- Created attachment 44761 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44761&action=edit Heavily simplified example, g++-5 compatible I'm attaching a dumbed down version of the previous example, which

[Bug target/87033] The compiler does not generate the LWAX instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87033 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Thu Sep 27 21:31:04 2018 New Revision: 264679 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264679&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport PR 87033 Added: branches/gcc-8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gc

[Bug tree-optimization/87458] fma and -O3 wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87458 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- - u._M_elems[0] = 7.0e+0; - u._M_elems[1] = 7.0e+0; + MEM[(double *)&u] = { 7.0e+0, 7.0e+0 }; D.41349 = create (1.0e+2); - _9 = MEM[(value_type &)&u]; - tmp_10 = -_9; _11 = MEM[(const value_type &)

[Bug tree-optimization/87458] fma and -O3 wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87458 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug c++/87458] New: fma and -O3 wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87458 Bug ID: 87458 Summary: fma and -O3 wrong result Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug target/87149] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2305 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87149 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Thu Sep 27 19:54:09 2018 New Revision: 264675 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264675&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rs6000: Delete many HAVE_AS_* (PR87149) This deletes most HAVE_AS_*

[Bug c++/84423] [6/7/8/9 Regression] [concepts] ICE with invalid using declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84423 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/87457] thread sanitizer false positive on virtual destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87457 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think the problem is that the std::thread code in libstdc++.so isn't built with ThreadSanitizer.

[Bug c++/87456] Attributes on a global empty statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87456 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug c++/87457] New: thread sanitizer false positive on virtual destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87457 Bug ID: 87457 Summary: thread sanitizer false positive on virtual destructor Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c/87435] "Duplicate const" warning NOT emitted from typedef in -std=c90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87435 Nick Desaulniers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/87456] New: Attributes on a global empty statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87456 Bug ID: 87456 Summary: Attributes on a global empty statement Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/87390] [x86 32bit only] GCC does not honor FLT_EVAL_METHOD on implicit conversion of integer to floating point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87390 --- Comment #27 from Vincent Lefèvre --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #26) > The general explanation of the choices made in the cases where C99 was > less than optimally clear is in >

[Bug target/87455] sse_packed_single_insn_optimal is suboptimal on Zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87455 --- Comment #1 from Fanael --- Assembly diff between the two: --- /dev/fd/63 2018-09-27 17:59:06.120507763 +0200 +++ /dev/fd/62 2018-09-27 17:59:06.120507763 +0200 @@ -7,21 +7,21 @@ main: .LFB5179: .cfi_startproc - movaps .LC0

[Bug c++/86946] ice: canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86946 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- Problem seems to exist sometime before revision 247000, dated 2017-04-19.

[Bug target/87455] New: sse_packed_single_insn_optimal is suboptimal on Zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87455 Bug ID: 87455 Summary: sse_packed_single_insn_optimal is suboptimal on Zen Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c/87390] [x86 32bit only] GCC does not honor FLT_EVAL_METHOD on implicit conversion of integer to floating point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87390 --- Comment #26 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Thu, 27 Sep 2018, vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net wrote: > > The interpretation of C99 rules for excess precision used in GCC has been > > explained at length from 2008 onwards. > > Could

[Bug sanitizer/87453] Maybe implement -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow and -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87453 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug debug/87440] GCC creates debug that confuses gdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87440 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug debug/87451] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87451 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 27 14:17:52 2018 New Revision: 264668 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264668&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-27 Richard Biener PR testsuite/87451 * gcc.

[Bug debug/37801] DWARF output for inlined functions doesn't always use DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37801 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 27 14:10:45 2018 New Revision: 264667 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264667&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-27 Richard Biener PR debug/37801 PR debug/

[Bug debug/87440] GCC creates debug that confuses gdb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87440 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 27 14:10:45 2018 New Revision: 264667 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264667&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-27 Richard Biener PR debug/37801 PR debug/8

[Bug debug/87451] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87451 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/87451] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87451 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64, arm|aarch64, |

[Bug c++/87452] decltype ignores namespace in trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87452 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Reduced a bit more: struct vector { }; namespace N { void operator+(const vector&) { } template auto f(const T& t) -> decltype(operator+(t)) // OK { return (+t); } template auto g(const T& t) -> decl

[Bug c++/87452] decltype ignores namespace in trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87452 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug sanitizer/87454] New: Maybe implement -fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87454 Bug ID: 87454 Summary: Maybe implement -fsanitize=implicit-integer-truncation Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug sanitizer/87453] Maybe implement -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow and -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87453 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Martin Li

[Bug sanitizer/80998] Implement -fsanitize=pointer-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80998 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- Jakub, can we close this?

[Bug sanitizer/87453] New: Maybe implement -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow and -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87453 Bug ID: 87453 Summary: Maybe implement -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow and -fsanitize=float-divide-by-zero Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c++/87452] New: decltype ignores namespace in trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87452 Bug ID: 87452 Summary: decltype ignores namespace in trailing return type Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug libstdc++/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 --- Comment #70 from Jonathan Wakely --- Drat, that is one of the symlinked files.

[Bug libstdc++/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 --- Comment #69 from Chris Johns --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #68) > (In reply to Chris Johns from comment #67) > > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #66) > > > Yes, I was afraid the RTEMS failures might be a different pr

[Bug middle-end/82089] emit_cstore sign-extends BImode result for STORE_FLAG_VALUE == 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82089 Andrew Stubbs changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/82089] emit_cstore sign-extends BImode result for STORE_FLAG_VALUE == 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82089 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Stubbs --- Author: ams Date: Thu Sep 27 11:15:48 2018 New Revision: 264666 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264666&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [pr82089] Don't sign-extend SFV 1 in BImode This is an update of the patch

[Bug debug/87451] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c on aarch64 and arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87451 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 --- Comment #68 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Chris Johns from comment #67) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #66) > > Yes, I was afraid the RTEMS failures might be a different problem. > > > > Are the symptoms the same? i.e. m

[Bug c++/67544] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_check3 (tree.h:2896) with -fconcepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67544 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 67544, which changed state. Bug 67544 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_check3 (tree.h:2896) with -fconcepts https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67544 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/67544] ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_check3 (tree.h:2896) with -fconcepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67544 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Sep 27 09:53:08 2018 New Revision: 264665 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264665&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-09-27 Paolo Carlini PR c++/67544 * g++

[Bug debug/87451] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c on aarch64 and arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87451 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 Summary|[9 R

[Bug debug/87451] New: [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c on aarch64 and arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87451 Bug ID: 87451 Summary: [9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline5.c on aarch64 and arm Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/86269] [concepts] ICE with intermediate concepts notation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86269 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86000] ICE with requires statement in a non constexpr if

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86000 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84810] [concepts][c++20] constraints of lambdas with explicit template parameters are not checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84810 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85229] .[concepts] ICE with local class in lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85229 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85241] Requires-expressions, fold expressions, and member function templates with dependent parameters don't play nicely

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85241 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||67491 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/85908] Internal error with concepts and polymorphic lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85908 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- I can't reproduce the issue with the released 8.1.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/87446] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at internal-fn.c:2431

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87446 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.4 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug libstdc++/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 --- Comment #67 from Chris Johns --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #66) > Yes, I was afraid the RTEMS failures might be a different problem. > > Are the symptoms the same? i.e. missing C++ standard library headers? > Yes it seems t

[Bug c++/84940] [7/8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in build_value_init_noctor, at cp/init.c:465

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84940 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Sep 27 08:33:41 2018 New Revision: 264664 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264664&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2018-09-27 Paolo Carlini PR c++/84940 *

[Bug fortran/87450] New: -Wunused-variable: false positive for associate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87450 Bug ID: 87450 Summary: -Wunused-variable: false positive for associate Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/87448] ICE at trans-expr:3417 in allocate statement with type signature using an associated variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448 --- Comment #2 from martin --- Originally I came across this problem in a large module with a slightly more complex function with gfortran-7.3.0 (standard version from ubuntu 18.4). I got the same bogus error, which Janus has seen for this reduce

[Bug fortran/87449] New: -Wunused-variable and associate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87449 Bug ID: 87449 Summary: -Wunused-variable and associate Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/87444] 'gcc -marc=native' sets L2 cache size equal to L3 cache size on i7 and i5 CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87444 --- Comment #6 from George --- Thanks!

[Bug fortran/87448] ICE at trans-expr:3417 in allocate statement with type signature using an associated variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87448 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/87444] 'gcc -marc=native' sets L2 cache size equal to L3 cache size on i7 and i5 CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87444 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to George from comment #4) > Richard Biener, > > Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately I don't understand what it means - > whether I should set explicitly the correct l2-cache-size or if that has a

[Bug libstdc++/81797] gcc 7.1.0 fails to build on macOS 10.13 (High Sierra):

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797 --- Comment #66 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, I was afraid the RTEMS failures might be a different problem. Are the symptoms the same? i.e. missing C++ standard library headers? Comment 17 suggests you're seeing missing libgcc headers, which is

[Bug gcov-profile/87442] Add options to filter files we want to instrument for code coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87442 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Maybe the other way around: -fprofile-filter-files -fprofile-exclude-files

[Bug rtl-optimization/87446] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at internal-fn.c:2431

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87446 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|