https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85507
--- Comment #21 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Actually, did the commits by Andre in May resolve this issue, or is there still
something left open?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87247
Bug ID: 87247
Summary: intrinsic acosh violates 2008 Standard rule 13.7.5
line 5
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87246
Bug ID: 87246
Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in decompose_normal_address,
at rtlanal.c:6379
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58442
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55531
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84726
Pádraig Brady changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||P at draigBrady dot com
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29442
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38093
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> That patch looks like binary; are you sure it's really a patch?
It is uuencoded. And yes a text file will look that funny as uuencoded file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71596
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38093
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69427
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35532
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61024
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87233
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #1)
> > The check is easy enough to delete:
> >
--- snip ---
> What happens with -std=f95 and -std=f2003?
>
> --
> steve
Well
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61024
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32497
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50582
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87245
Bug ID: 87245
Summary: [missed optimization] switching on indices of struct
members
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56703
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35532
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61024
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55523
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58828
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37013
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56954
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46489
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78893
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39165
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87244
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|ka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87244
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87241
--- Comment #2 from Li Peng ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> __cxa_demangle in cp-demangle.c correctly returns -2 (the mangled name is
> not valid) but cplus_demangle in cplus-dem.c tries to allocate crazy amounts
> of memory.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87244
Bug ID: 87244
Summary: Failure to compile an allocate statement of variable
length
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87243
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
All I'm asking is that that we describe the real bug (i.e. that we need to be
able to find the headers when they are not installed in some Well Known Place).
It should also work for -mmacosz-version-min != cur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86731
--- Comment #3 from Will Schmidt ---
Author: willschm
Date: Thu Sep 6 19:47:06 2018
New Revision: 264150
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264150&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-09-06 Will Schmidt
PR target/86731
* con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86830
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87239
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70124
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87242
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Greg Minshall from comment #1)
> sorry, the attachment is too long (4MB).
You can compress it, usually preprocessed source compresses nicely with either
gzip or bzip2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87243
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87243
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> I am strongly against making GCC's configure depend on xcrun. It is quite
> possible that GCC could be used, for example, with PureDarwin - or on
> systems without
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87243
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
I am strongly against making GCC's configure depend on xcrun. It is quite
possible that GCC could be used, for example, with PureDarwin - or on systems
without any Xcode install (using headers built from the O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87243
Bug ID: 87243
Summary: FSF needs to use xcrun on darwin18 to find system
headers in SDK
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87188
--- Comment #16 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2018-09-05 7:38 PM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87188
>
> --- Comment #15 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
> On 2018-09-05 7:21 PM, d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87242
--- Comment #1 from Greg Minshall ---
sorry, the attachment is too long (4MB).
is there any tool for whittling away the unnecessary bits, given a .c file --
i'd create by -E, though maybe the .i file would work? -- and a target function
-- i.e.,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87242
Bug ID: 87242
Summary: optimize -O2 incorrect output
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87162
ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma.jiang at zte dot com.cn
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87241
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80080
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Sep 6 07:38:42 2018
New Revision: 264143
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264143&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: Prohibit SYMBOL_REF in UNSPECV_CAS
Inhibit constant propagati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80080
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Thu Sep 6 07:35:35 2018
New Revision: 264142
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=264142&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: Register pass_s390_early_mach statically
The dump file used t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87231
--- Comment #3 from Shane Kerr ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Similar issue to PR 69744. OpenBSD config should just remove that.
How would I do that?
Should I just comment out the USER_H variable?
51 matches
Mail list logo