[Bug target/69038] compilation error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'FP_REGS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69038 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86399] New: gcc 9.0 from r262251 can't be build for Windows/mingw-w64 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86399 Bug ID: 86399 Summary: gcc 9.0 from r262251 can't be build for Windows/mingw-w64 target Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/28472] -B$(build_tooldir)/bin/

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28472 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/5301] Cross-compiler docs problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5301 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/12596] configure setting --with-libiconv-prefix doesn't get passed to gcc-subdir

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12596 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug c++/77456] Suboptimal code when returning a string generated with a constexpr fn at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77456 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org S

[Bug fortran/48776] ICE(segfault) after -std=f95 diagnostic error involving PROCEDURE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48776 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr,

[Bug c++/60335] confused by earlier errors, bailing out

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60335 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Status|ASSIG

[Bug target/69038] compilation error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'FP_REGS'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69038 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/85620] Missing ENDBR after swapcontext

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620 --- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jul 4 03:01:33 2018 New Revision: 262370 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262370&root=gcc&view=rev Log: i386: Add indirect_return function attribute On x86, swapcontext m

[Bug tree-optimization/86274] [7/8 Regression] SEGFAULT when logging std::to_string(NAN)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] SEGFAULT |[7/8 Regression] SEGFAULT

[Bug tree-optimization/86274] [7/8/9 Regression] SEGFAULT when logging std::to_string(NAN)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274 --- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Jul 4 02:19:35 2018 New Revision: 262368 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262368&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/86274 - SEGFAULT when logging std::to_string(NAN) g

[Bug c++/86398] New: is_trivially_constructible always returns true even when is_constructible returns false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86398 Bug ID: 86398 Summary: is_trivially_constructible always returns true even when is_constructible returns false Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug c++/86397] New: g++ ICE at on valid code in nothrow_spec_p, at cp/except.c:1158

=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/9.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 9.0.0 20180703

[Bug tree-optimization/86274] [7/8/9 Regression] SEGFAULT when logging std::to_string(NAN)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor

[Bug middle-end/86380] incorrect comparison in function chose_multiplier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86380 --- Comment #4 from Colin Bartlett --- >(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3) > > I suspected that when compiled programs didn't show the error, but: > > > > 1. Is that documented anywhere? It might be useful if that was documented > > als

[Bug tree-optimization/86396] New: fold calls to strtod() into constants where possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86396 Bug ID: 86396 Summary: fold calls to strtod() into constants where possible Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug tree-optimization/86396] fold calls to strtod() into constants where possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86396 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|no

[Bug middle-end/86380] incorrect comparison in function chose_multiplier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86380 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- > I suspected that when compiled programs didn't show the error, but: > > 1. Is that documented anywhere? It might be useful if that was documented > also in choose_multiplier? > > 2. Is that anyway any rea

[Bug ipa/86395] add support of -fopt-info-inline in early inliner

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86395 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|normal

[Bug target/86387] [RISCV][ABI] GCC fails to sign/zero-ext integers as necessary for passing/returning int+fp structs on hard-float ABIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86387 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/86395] New: add support of -fopt-info-inline in early inliner

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86395 Bug ID: 86395 Summary: add support of -fopt-info-inline in early inliner Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: i

[Bug target/86386] [8/9 Regression] unaligned load from stack with -Os -fno-tree-dce -mstringop-strategy=vector_loop -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86386 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug middle-end/86380] incorrect comparison in function chose_multiplier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86380 --- Comment #2 from Colin Bartlett --- I suspected that when compiled programs didn't show the error, but: 1. Is that documented anywhere? It might be useful if that was documented also in choose_multiplier? 2. Is that anyway any reason not to

[Bug target/86394] New: Broken -falign-functions=512 on m68k

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86394 Bug ID: 86394 Summary: Broken -falign-functions=512 on m68k Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 85694, which changed state. Bug 85694 Summary: Generation of vectorized AVG (Average) instruction https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/85694] Generation of vectorized AVG (Average) instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85694] Generation of vectorized AVG (Average) instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694 --- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue Jul 3 17:33:28 2018 New Revision: 262354 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262354&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/85694 * config/i386/sse.md (uavg3_ceil)

[Bug target/86393] GCC-8 appears to not detect AVX512 on iMac Pro 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Slevinsky --- I'm not sure if this answers your question, but compiling the same program (modifying 8 to 128 to tease the compiler into using zmm registers) with clang-6 works fine.

[Bug target/86393] GCC-8 appears to not detect AVX512 on iMac Pro 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/86201] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86201 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86201] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86201 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Jul 3 16:38:16 2018 New Revision: 262353 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262353&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86201 * typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): Check c_i

[Bug c++/86378] [7/8/9 regression] typedef breaks functional cast in noexcept-qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86378] [7/8/9 regression] typedef breaks functional cast in noexcept-qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jul 3 16:27:04 2018 New Revision: 262352 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262352&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86378 - functional cast in noexcept-specifier. * t

[Bug c++/86378] [7/8/9 regression] typedef breaks functional cast in noexcept-qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jul 3 16:25:55 2018 New Revision: 262351 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262351&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86378 - functional cast in noexcept-specifier. * t

[Bug c++/85155] Suboptimal error messages when using noexcept(false) on defaulted dtor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85155 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- GCC's behaviour is correct by the resolution of https://wg21.link/cwg1778 but apparently that rule causes problems. Maybe Clang doesn't support it yet.

[Bug c++/86201] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86201 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek

[Bug target/86393] GCC-8 appears to not detect AVX512 on iMac Pro 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Slevinsky --- I'm not so sure. Consider the following minimal test file: #include #include int main(void) { double * X, * Y, * Z; X = (double *) calloc(8, sizeof(double)); Y = (double *) call

[Bug tree-optimization/85694] Generation of vectorized AVG (Average) instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 44348 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44348&action=edit x86 target patch I'm testing the attached patch for x86 targets.

[Bug target/86388] Enhancement: sort "valid arguments to '-march=' switch" suggestions alphabetically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86388 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1) > I'd prefer existing ordering relative to alphabetical: the list produced by > GCC is mostly ordered first by manufacturer, then by > generation/capabilities.

[Bug tree-optimization/85694] Generation of vectorized AVG (Average) instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|rsa

[Bug target/86393] GCC-8 appears to not detect AVX512 on iMac Pro 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Component|c

[Bug c++/86392] templatized friend member function needs declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86392 --- Comment #3 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de --- Thank you very much for the explanation and sorry for using the wrong platform ;)

[Bug c++/86392] templatized friend member function needs declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86392 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/86393] New: GCC-8 appears to not detect AVX512 on iMac Pro 2018

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86393 Bug ID: 86393 Summary: GCC-8 appears to not detect AVX512 on iMac Pro 2018 Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/86368] an unknown [[attribute]] should not trigger a warning in C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86368 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Hannes Hauswedell from comment #3) > BUT if this code generates warnings there is a problem: obviously I don't > want to tell downstream developers that "it's ok, just ignore the warnings" > (s

[Bug target/86388] Enhancement: sort "valid arguments to '-march=' switch" suggestions alphabetically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86388 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64 Component|driver

[Bug c++/86201] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86201 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/86368] an unknown [[attribute]] should not trigger a warning in C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86368 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- It's quite unlikely (pun intended) that code randomly sprinkled with various non-standard annotations (attributes, pragmas, or otherwise) will eventually have the same effect across all implementations once th

[Bug c++/86392] templatized friend member function needs declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86392 --- Comment #1 from rene.r...@fu-berlin.de --- Created attachment 44347 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44347&action=edit The example

[Bug c++/86392] New: templatized friend member function needs declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86392 Bug ID: 86392 Summary: templatized friend member function needs declaration Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug tree-optimization/85694] Generation of vectorized AVG (Average) instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Jul 3 14:27:28 2018 New Revision: 262347 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262347&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [17/n] PR85694: AArch64 support for AVG_FLOOR/CEIL This

[Bug c++/84306] Wrong overload selected with -std=c++17, explicit and {}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84306 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84306] Wrong overload selected with -std=c++17, explicit and {}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84306 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Jul 3 14:25:38 2018 New Revision: 262345 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262345&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/84306 * g++.dg/overload/conv-op3.C: New test. A

[Bug ada/86391] New: Cannot pass array as aliased formal parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86391 Bug ID: 86391 Summary: Cannot pass array as aliased formal parameter Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug middle-end/86202] [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_range_info calling an invalid memcpy() declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86202 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Jul 3 14:21:15 2018 New Revision: 262344 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262344&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/86202 * gimple-fold.c (size_must_be_zero_

[Bug c++/86378] [7/8/9 regression] typedef breaks functional cast in noexcept-qualifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86378 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jul 3 14:13:02 2018 New Revision: 262343 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262343&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86378 - functional cast in noexcept-specifier. * t

[Bug c++/86368] an unknown [[attribute]] should not trigger a warning in C++17

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86368 --- Comment #3 from Hannes Hauswedell --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > It might be reasonable for GCC to silently ignore attributes that use an > unrecognized attribute-namespace. If somebody uses [[clang::foobar]] or > [[acme:

[Bug ipa/86389] execute FAILs with -fipa-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86389 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jul 3 13:56:58 2018 New Revision: 262341 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262341&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-07-03 Richard Biener PR ipa/86389 * tree-ssa-s

[Bug fortran/86242] [6/7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] ICE for derived type with allocatable component and proc-ptr component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86242 --- Comment #11 from c...@mnet-mail.de --- Thanks for the fix! On 07/03/2018 12:48 PM, pault at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86242 > > Paul Thomas changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug target/86390] ICE in output_branch, at config/sh/sh.c:2740 for sh-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86390 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2018-7-3 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/86390] New: ICE in output_branch, at config/sh/sh.c:2740 for sh-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86390 Bug ID: 86390 Summary: ICE in output_branch, at config/sh/sh.c:2740 for sh-linux Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug bootstrap/86376] recent breakage in ubsan build ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86376 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška

[Bug target/86387] [RISCV][ABI] GCC fails to sign/zero-ext integers as necessary for passing/returning int+fp structs on with hard-float ABIs

d_sext_arg, @function should_sext_arg: addisp,sp,-32 sw ra,28(sp) callmust_receive_sext_arg lw ra,28(sp) addisp,sp,32 jr ra .size should_sext_arg, .-should_sext_arg .ident "GCC: (GNU) 9.0.0 20180703 (experimental)"

[Bug driver/86388] Enhancement: sort "valid arguments to '-march=' switch" suggestions alphabetically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86388 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug c++/86082] user-defined literals are not converted to the execution charset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86082 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- I can't approve that, I was just checking if this should be closed now (and testing updates to a version=8.0.1 bug after Richi made some Bugzilla config changes).

[Bug bootstrap/86376] recent breakage in ubsan build ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86376 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- My UBSAN bootstrap is broken by a recent commit: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg00111.html I'll try a bit older revision to see if I see also the debug info comparison failure.

[Bug ipa/86389] execute FAILs with -fipa-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86389 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||85960 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biene

[Bug ipa/86389] New: execute FAILs with -fipa-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86389 Bug ID: 86389 Summary: execute FAILs with -fipa-pta Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug ipa/86389] execute FAILs with -fipa-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86389 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/86388] New: Enhancement: sort "valid arguments to '-march=' switch" suggestions alphabetically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86388 Bug ID: 86388 Summary: Enhancement: sort "valid arguments to '-march=' switch" suggestions alphabetically Product: gcc Version: 7.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywor

[Bug target/86382] Configuration powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu_paired not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86382 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86382] Configuration powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu_paired not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86382 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Jul 3 11:22:24 2018 New Revision: 262340 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262340&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Remove powerpc-linux_paired from config-list.mk The target has been

[Bug target/86387] New: [RISCV][ABI] GCC fails to sign/zero-ext integers as necessary for return of int+fp structs in with hard-float ABIs

.align 2 .globl should_sext_arg .type should_sext_arg, @function should_sext_arg: addisp,sp,-32 addisp,sp,32 jr ra .size should_sext_arg, .-should_sext_arg .ident "GCC: (GNU) 9.0.0 20180703 (experimental)"

[Bug c++/84306] Wrong overload selected with -std=c++17, explicit and {}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84306 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/86386] [8/9 Regression] unaligned load from stack with -Os -fno-tree-dce -mstringop-strategy=vector_loop -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86386 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/86386] New: [8/9 Regression] unaligned load from stack with -Os -fno-tree-dce -mstringop-strategy=vector_loop -mavx512bw

-disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-262329-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-nobootstrap-amd64 Thread model: posix gcc version 9.0.0 20180703 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug fortran/82969] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_class_vptr_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82969 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/86242] [6/7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] ICE for derived type with allocatable component and proc-ptr component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86242 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/84893] Rejects a valid code with variadic function template taking a function pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84893 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Version|8.0.1 |8.1.0 See Also|

[Bug fortran/86242] [6/7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] ICE for derived type with allocatable component and proc-ptr component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86242 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Jul 3 10:45:52 2018 New Revision: 262339 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262339&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-07-03 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82969 PR fortran/86242

[Bug fortran/82969] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_class_vptr_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82969 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Jul 3 10:45:52 2018 New Revision: 262339 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262339&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-07-03 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82969 PR fortran/86242

[Bug c++/85569] [8/9 Regression] is_invocable(F, decltype(objs)...) fails with "not supported by dump_expr#" unless via indirection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85569 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c++/86082] user-defined literals are not converted to the execution charset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86082 --- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel --- (In reply to jwakely from comment #5) > On 03/07/18 10:07 +, r...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > >--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- > >Is this fixed now? > > Or do you plan to backport it? I would like t

[Bug c++/84893] Rejects a valid code with variadic function template taking a function pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84893 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- We have a number of very similar bugs related to deducing function types from function pointers.

[Bug c++/85155] Suboptimal error messages when using noexcept(false) on defaulted dtor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85155 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Version|8.0.1 |8.1.0 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug c++/84306] Wrong overload selected with -std=c++17, explicit and {}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84306 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/86082] user-defined literals are not converted to the execution charset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86082 --- Comment #5 from jwakely at redhat dot com --- On 03/07/18 10:07 +, r...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: >--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- >Is this fixed now? Or do you plan to backport it?

[Bug c++/86082] user-defined literals are not converted to the execution charset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86082 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/85694] Generation of vectorized AVG (Average) instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85694 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Jul 3 10:03:44 2018 New Revision: 262335 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262335&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [16/n] PR85694: Add detection of averaging operations T

[Bug target/86383] [9 Regression] arm-netbsdelf cross compiler fails in selftests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86383 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |9.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/82969] [6/7/8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_class_vptr_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82969 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Jul 3 09:46:31 2018 New Revision: 262331 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262331&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-07-03 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82969 PR fortran/86242

[Bug fortran/86242] [6/7/8/9 Regression] [OOP] ICE for derived type with allocatable component and proc-ptr component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86242 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Tue Jul 3 09:46:31 2018 New Revision: 262331 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262331&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-07-03 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82969 PR fortran/86242

[Bug target/86285] We don't mangle __ieee128 correctly using -mlong-double-64 -mabi=ieeelongdouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86285 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86382] Configuration powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu_paired not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86382 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassig

[Bug c++/86385] calling wrong constructors?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86385 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Reduced slightly: struct A { int* a; A(int a) : a(new int(a)) {} ~A() { delete a; } A(const A&) = delete; A(A&& other) { a = other.a; other.a = 0; }; operator bool() { return true; } }; A ma

[Bug target/86382] Configuration powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu_paired not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86382 --- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool --- *** Bug 86381 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/86381] New: Configuration powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu_paired not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86381 Bug ID: 86381 Summary: Configuration powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu_paired not supported Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/86385] calling wrong constructors?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86385 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/86384] Scoped enumeration instantiated even if not required

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86384 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- And please stop reporting bugs for 8.0.1 -- that's an unsupported pre-release build that could be from any time between January and April. Use 8.1.0 or trunk.

  1   2   >