[Bug c++/86320] very long compilation time for std::array, 1024 * 1024>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86320 --- Comment #7 from Ulya --- Thank you, that was really fast!

[Bug sanitizer/86275] gcc-8.1, linux 4.18-rc1, x86_64: error: redefinition of 'struct timespec'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86275 --- Comment #8 from Milhouse --- Many thanks Florian - my Google Fu failed me! I've tested your patch from https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-06/msg00673.html with glibc-2.27, and have now successfully built gcc-8.1 with 4.18-rc1 for x86_

[Bug c++/86291] OpenMP incorrect for-loop collapsing with iterators and at least 5 nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86291 --- Comment #7 from Mattéo Delabre --- Can confirm the fix works for my use case. Thanks!

[Bug sanitizer/86275] gcc-8.1, linux 4.18-rc1, x86_64: error: redefinition of 'struct timespec'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86275 --- Comment #7 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Milhouse from comment #6) > Is there any other information I can add, or anything I can test (patches > etc.) that might help clarify/determine/narrow down where this problem lies? I posted a g

[Bug c++/86320] very long compilation time for std::array, 1024 * 1024>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86320 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86320] very long compilation time for std::array, 1024 * 1024>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86320 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 27 03:06:43 2018 New Revision: 262175 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262175&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86320 - memory-hog with std::array of pair * typec

[Bug c++/80290] [6/7/8/9 Regression] g++ uses unreasonable amount of memory compiling nested string maps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80290 --- Comment #30 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 27 03:05:17 2018 New Revision: 262174 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262174&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/80290 - memory-hog with std::pair. * pt.c (type_u

[Bug middle-end/86202] [8/9 Regression] ICE in get_range_info calling an invalid memcpy() declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86202 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Summary|[8/9 Regression]

[Bug middle-end/86308] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple calling an invalid index() declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86308 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Component|c

[Bug c/83656] missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on declaration without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83656 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -

[Bug c++/86320] very long compilation time for std::array, 1024 * 1024>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86320 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 27 02:59:44 2018 New Revision: 262173 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262173&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86320 - memory-hog with std::array of pair * typec

[Bug c++/80290] [6/7/8/9 Regression] g++ uses unreasonable amount of memory compiling nested string maps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80290 --- Comment #29 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 27 02:59:38 2018 New Revision: 262172 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262172&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/80290 - memory-hog with std::pair. * pt.c (fn_typ

[Bug sanitizer/86275] gcc-8.1, linux 4.18-rc1, x86_64: error: redefinition of 'struct timespec'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86275 --- Comment #6 from Milhouse --- Is there any other information I can add, or anything I can test (patches etc.) that might help clarify/determine/narrow down where this problem lies?

[Bug c++/86327] New: Spurious error on non-constant expression in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86327 Bug ID: 86327 Summary: Spurious error on non-constant expression in constexpr function Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/86138] [7/8 Regression] C++17: getline(istream, string) crashes on Cygwin because incompatible C++14 function is called

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138 --- Comment #24 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Jun 27 00:11:53 2018 New Revision: 262167 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262167&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Declare some explicit instantiations for strings in Debug Mode The empt

[Bug libstdc++/86138] [7/8 Regression] C++17: getline(istream, string) crashes on Cygwin because incompatible C++14 function is called

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138 --- Comment #23 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Christian Franke from comment #18) > With patch from r261873, crash on -std=c++17 does no longer occur with > testcase from comment #3. Same for a wchar_t version of the testcase. > According

[Bug go/86289] Cgo integer constant overflow for 64 bits (unsigned) int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86289 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/86289] Cgo integer constant overflow for 64 bits (unsigned) int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86289 Stephen Kim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c/83656] missing -Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch on declaration without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83656 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86324] testsuite test divkc3-1.c FAILs when compiling with -mabi=ieeelongdouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86324 --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner --- So talking with Joseph on IRC, he said if K[FC]mode or I[FC}mode are the same as long double, then we should translate the mode attribute in c-attribs.c:handle_mode_attribute() to return the T[FC]mode instead

[Bug c++/80272] g++ runs out of memory and crashes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80272 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/84281] Heap grows indefinitely

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84281 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mirzayanovmr at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/68203] Аbout infinite compilation time on struct with nested array of pairs with -std=c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68203 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/56671] Gcc uses large amounts of memory and processor power with large C++11 bitsets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56671 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/84281] Heap grows indefinitely

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84281 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m101010a at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug target/86324] testsuite test divkc3-1.c FAILs when compiling with -mabi=ieeelongdouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86324 --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner --- And a complementary bug for a __ibm128 complex type when using -mabi=ibmlongdouble: bergner@pike:~/gcc/BUGS/PR86324$ cat divic.i typedef __complex float __cfloat128 __attribute__((mode(IC))); __cfloat128 di

[Bug c++/12850] memory consumption for heavy template instantiations tripled since 3.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12850 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #49

[Bug c++/86320] very long compilation time for std::array, 1024 * 1024>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86320 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/86326] New: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialized value in calculate_allocatation_cost (ira.c:2457)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86326 Bug ID: 86326 Summary: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialized value in calculate_allocatation_cost (ira.c:2457) Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/86265] Wrong code on an invalid code starting with r255790

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86265 --- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor --- I would expect the additional detail (about the structure of data) to only help improve things, not ever make them worse, or introduce bugs into correct code. But relying on the structure of data is not novel

[Bug target/86222] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 calling strncmp() with a bound of PTRDIFF_MAX + 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86222 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug go/86289] Cgo integer constant overflow for 64 bits (unsigned) int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86289 --- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor --- I think there is a real problem here. Filed https://golang.org/issue/26066.

[Bug target/86324] testsuite test divkc3-1.c FAILs when compiling with -mabi=ieeelongdouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86324 --- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner --- Ok, it still fails even with Segher's patch. I'll try and track things down.

[Bug target/86222] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 calling strncmp() with a bound of PTRDIFF_MAX + 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86222 --- Comment #6 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: acsawdey Date: Tue Jun 26 16:43:38 2018 New Revision: 262157 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262157&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-26 Aaron Sawdey Backport from trunk

[Bug c++/64697] C++11 thread_local: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `TLS init function for N::ptd'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697 --- Comment #20 from Václav Haisman --- Still an issue in 2018 with GCC 7.3.0.

[Bug c++/86184] Conditional expression with omitted operand cannot use rvalue of type convertible to bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86184 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch CC|

[Bug target/86324] testsuite test divkc3-1.c FAILs when compiling with -mabi=ieeelongdouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86324 --- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner --- I thought I had Segher's PR82625 patch applied but didn't. I'm rebuilding with that fix to see if this still FAILs with that fix or not.

[Bug fortran/86325] Error on valid code with pointer class components using -finit-derived

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86325 Fritz Reese changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/86325] New: Error on valid code with pointer class components using -finit-derived

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86325 Bug ID: 86325 Summary: Error on valid code with pointer class components using -finit-derived Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/86324] New: testsuite test divkc3-1.c ICEs when compiling with -mabi=ieeelongdouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86324 Bug ID: 86324 Summary: testsuite test divkc3-1.c ICEs when compiling with -mabi=ieeelongdouble Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/82625] lower-optimization are not inlined with symbol multiversioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82625 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug target/86285] We don't mangle __ieee128 correctly using -mlong-double-64 -mabi=ieeelongdouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86285 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86285] We don't mangle __ieee128 correctly using -mlong-double-64 -mabi=ieeelongdouble

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86285 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Jun 26 16:08:30 2018 New Revision: 262156 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262156&root=gcc&view=rev Log: I typoed the PR numnber, correct is: PR target/86285

[Bug rtl-optimization/85645] [7/8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85645 --- Comment #15 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Jun 26 15:39:02 2018 New Revision: 262155 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262155&root=gcc&view=rev Log: regrename: Don't rename the dest of a REG_CFA_REGISTER (PR85645) W

[Bug rtl-optimization/85645] [7/8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2348

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85645 --- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Jun 26 15:36:21 2018 New Revision: 262154 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262154&root=gcc&view=rev Log: regcprop: Avoid REG_CFA_REGISTER notes (PR85645) Changing a SET th

[Bug c++/86184] Conditional expression with omitted operand cannot use rvalue of type convertible to bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86184 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01345.html

[Bug c++/86323] New: [9 regression] internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:85

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86323 Bug ID: 86323 Summary: [9 regression] internal compiler error: in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:85 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug tree-optimization/82625] lower-optimization are not inlined with symbol multiversioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82625 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Tue Jun 26 15:16:58 2018 New Revision: 262152 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262152&root=gcc&view=rev Log: rs6000: Set up ieee128_float_type_node correctly (PR82625) We shoul

[Bug fortran/86322] [9 Regression] ICE in reference_record with data statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86322 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug bootstrap/86316] tree-vect-loop.c possible uninitialized variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86316 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 06:44:48AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- > Not sure how it escaped earlier testing... anyway, fixed. > Thanks.

[Bug fortran/86322] [9 Regression] ICE in reference_record with data statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86322 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/86322] New: ICE in reference_record with data statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86322 Bug ID: 86322 Summary: ICE in reference_record with data statement Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug lto/86321] [9 Regression] ICE: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5693 for several Fortran tests with -g -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86321 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- We're generating types late via if ((origin == NULL && !specialization_p) || (origin != NULL && !DECL_ABSTRACT_P (decl_or_origin) && variably_modified_type_p (TREE_TYPE (decl_or_

[Bug target/85434] Address of stack protector guard spilled to stack on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85434 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||CVE-2018-12886 --- Comment #16 from

[Bug lto/86321] [9 Regression] ICE: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5693 for several Fortran tests with -g -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86321 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/86321] New: [9 Regression] ICE: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5693 for several Fortran tests with -g -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86321 Bug ID: 86321 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE: in splice_child_die, at dwarf2out.c:5693 for several Fortran tests with -g -flto Product: gcc Version: 9.0

[Bug target/86314] [7/8/9 Regression] GCC 7.x and 8.x zero out "eax" before using "rax" in "lock bts"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/86291] OpenMP incorrect for-loop collapsing with iterators and at least 5 nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86291 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86314] [7/8/9 Regression] GCC 7.x and 8.x zero out "eax" before using "rax" in "lock bts"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86314 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 26 11:54:29 2018 New Revision: 262144 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262144&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/86314 * config/i386/i386.md (setcc + movzbl to x

[Bug target/86314] [7/8/9 Regression] GCC 7.x and 8.x zero out "eax" before using "rax" in "lock bts"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86314 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 26 11:46:10 2018 New Revision: 262142 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262142&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/86314 * config/i386/i386.md (setcc + movzbl to x

[Bug target/86314] [7/8/9 Regression] GCC 7.x and 8.x zero out "eax" before using "rax" in "lock bts"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86314 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 26 11:35:52 2018 New Revision: 262141 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262141&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/86314 * config/i386/i386.md (setcc + movzbl to x

[Bug c++/86291] OpenMP incorrect for-loop collapsing with iterators and at least 5 nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86291 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 26 11:33:48 2018 New Revision: 262140 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262140&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86291 * parser.c (cp_parser_omp_for_loop_init): Cha

[Bug target/86314] [7/8/9 Regression] GCC 7.x and 8.x zero out "eax" before using "rax" in "lock bts"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86314 --- Comment #5 from Matthieu M --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Created attachment 44322 [details] > gcc9-pr86314.patch > > Untested fix. The peephole2s didn't expect that an insn with a set of flags > and some other set could

[Bug c++/86296] Creating a pointer class for a unique_ptr<>() deleter fails with optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86296 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Alexis Wilke from comment #3) > However, as an FYI, I tried the -fsanitize=address and the > -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS command line options as shown in your examples and did > not get any errors re

[Bug c++/86291] OpenMP incorrect for-loop collapsing with iterators and at least 5 nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86291 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 26 11:16:10 2018 New Revision: 262139 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262139&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86291 * parser.c (cp_parser_omp_for_loop_init): Cha

[Bug c++/86320] very long compilation time for std::array, 1024 * 1024>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86320 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog, |

[Bug c++/86291] OpenMP incorrect for-loop collapsing with iterators and at least 5 nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86291 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 26 10:44:52 2018 New Revision: 262138 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262138&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86291 * parser.c (cp_parser_omp_for_loop_init): Cha

[Bug c++/86291] OpenMP incorrect for-loop collapsing with iterators and at least 5 nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86291 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 26 10:40:50 2018 New Revision: 262137 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262137&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/86291 * parser.c (cp_parser_omp_for_loop_init): Cha

[Bug debug/86257] Program compiled with fPIC crashes while stepping over thread-local variable GDB

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86257 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 26 10:36:19 2018 New Revision: 262136 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262136&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/86257 * gcc.target/i386/pr86257.c: Add -mtls-dial

[Bug c++/86320] very long compilation time for std::array, 1024 * 1024>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86320 Ulya changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|very long compilatio n |very long compilation time |

[Bug c++/86320] New: very long compilatio n

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86320 Bug ID: 86320 Summary: very long compilatio n Product: gcc Version: 8.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: un

[Bug ipa/86274] [7/8/9 Regression] SEGFAULT when logging std::to_string(NAN)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274 --- Comment #3 from Filip Matzner --- Thank you for digging into this. I actually hit the issue in a large code base that crashed even without printing anything to boost log. But when cutting off parts of the code, the error happened nondetermini

[Bug rtl-optimization/86108] [8 Regression] crash during unwinding with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86108 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/86314] [7/8/9 Regression] GCC 7.x and 8.x zero out "eax" before using "rax" in "lock bts"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86314 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 44322 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44322&action=edit gcc9-pr86314.patch Untested fix. The peephole2s didn't expect that an insn with a set of flags and some other

[Bug tree-optimization/86287] [9 Regression] AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on bootstrap with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86287 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/86319] [9 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86319 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/86318] const local aggregates can be assumed not to be modified even when escaped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86318 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86314] [7/8/9 Regression] GCC 7.x and 8.x zero out "eax" before using "rax" in "lock bts"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/86314] [7/8/9 Regression] GCC 7.x and 8.x zero out "eax" before using "rax" in "lock bts"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86314 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/86291] OpenMP incorrect for-loop collapsing with iterators and at least 5 nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86291 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/86291] OpenMP incorrect for-loop collapsing with iterators and at least 5 nested loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86291 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/86314] [7/8/9 Regression] GCC 7.x and 8.x zero out "eax" before using "rax" in "lock bts"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86314 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/86265] Wrong code on an invalid code starting with r255790

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86265 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86265 > > --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- > The strlen range optimization doesn't take a