https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 49630, which changed state.
Bug 49630 Summary: [OOP] ICE on obsolescent deferred-length type bound
character function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jun 22 06:22:14 2018
New Revision: 261881
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261881&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't preprocess .S files with -P on Solaris/x86 (PR target/85994)
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994
--- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jun 22 06:19:14 2018
New Revision: 261880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261880&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't preprocess .S files with -P on Solaris/x86 (PR target/85994)
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86277
Bug ID: 86277
Summary: Presence of optional arguments not recognized for zero
length arrays
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86272
François Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fdumont at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79986
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I believe it's done. So all the CHKP/MPX bugs can be CLOSED/WONTFIX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46524
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41299
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59521
--- Comment #18 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #17)
> Unfortunately I decided to postpone it to GCC 9.x.
GCC 9.x development is ongoing now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29550
--- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #9)
> I think I will defer this until gcc-9.
It's gcc-9's stage 1 now, so if this is being deferred until now, now's the
time...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70321
--- Comment #18 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #17)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16)
> > We didn't do that in stage1, stage4 is too risky for that. Can somebody
> > from Intel try that for GCC9 stage1?
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
--- Comment #20 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #19)
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882
> >
> > --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Hum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79986
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #9)
> I'm expecting we'll deprecate MPX. Lowering to P4.
The removal of it is in progress, isn't it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65703
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41767
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #12 from Eric Gallag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80092
--- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #11)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #10)
> > Have all of the changes committed from this bug fixed it?
>
> No, I'm preparing some changes for stage1.
It's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86276
Bug ID: 86276
Summary: Poor codegen when returning a std::vector
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jun 21 23:29:01 2018
New Revision: 261873
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261873&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/86138 prevent implicit instantiation of COW empty rep
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86275
Bug ID: 86275
Summary: gcc-8.1, linux 4.18-rc1, x86_64: error: redefinition
of 'struct timespec'
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49630
--- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Jun 21 22:38:55 2018
New Revision: 261868
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261868&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/49630
* resolve.c (re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86274
Bug ID: 86274
Summary: SEGFAULT when logging std::to_string(NAN)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86270
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
:-(
So many transforms seem to have this kind of drawback...
We could always add a pair of single_use checks, but we are going to miss some
optimizations if we do that. Maybe it is slightly relevant that one +1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83328
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #6 from Jona
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83328
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jun 21 22:01:25 2018
New Revision: 261866
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261866&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83328 add correct basic_string::insert for initializer_list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86273
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced:
namespace std {
template struct vector { };
}
struct Input {
std::vector;
};
id.cc:6:8: error: a template-id may not appear in a using-declaration
std::vector;
^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86273
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86273
Bug ID: 86273
Summary: confusing diagnostic for member-declaration with
missing identifier
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86246
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57891
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29027
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-04-03 02:57:06 |2018-6-21
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86222
--- Comment #4 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well when compiling this with -m32 -mcpu=power[6789] I get this for the rtx of
the length argument:
(const_int -2147483648 [0x8000])
So when I am doing UINTVAL (bytes_rtx) I get 0xf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86272
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86272
Bug ID: 86272
Summary: __gnu_debug::string uses undefined
__glibcxx_check_insert_range2
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86219
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #2 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86219
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86182
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86182
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 21 18:19:23 2018
New Revision: 261858
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261858&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86182 - fix wrong PR tag in earlier commit
Modified:
t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86271
--- Comment #1 from pkoning at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-06/msg00228.html is the discussion and mentions
a possible fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83118
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Jun 21 17:34:31 2018
New Revision: 261857
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261857&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-21 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/83118
* resolve.c (res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86271
Bug ID: 86271
Summary: ICE due to size mismatch when inlining
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86214
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86184
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Runtime test:
int j;
struct X {
X() { j++; }
operator bool() { return true; }
};
/* Only create X once. */
bool b = X() ?: false;
bool b2 = X() ? X() : false;
int
main ()
{
if (j != 3)
__builtin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86270
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70940
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jun 21 16:24:00 2018
New Revision: 261851
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261851&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/70940 make pmr::resource_adaptor return aligned memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86270
Bug ID: 86270
Summary: Simple loop needs an extra register and an extra
instruction
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86222
--- Comment #3 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, so this requires -m32 and also -mcpu=power6 or higher. I have reproduced it
so should have a fix shortly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86222
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86184
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86265
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Using strncpy or strlen to cross subobject boundaries isn't valid. GCC catches
the strncpy bug with -Warray-bounds:
pr86265.c: In function ‘main’:
...
In file included from /usr/include/string.h:630,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86241
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Unlike bug 86203, the test case here uses local variables for the results of
the calls to eliminate the possibility of aliasing between them and what the
char pointer points to.
More important, unlike strlen,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
(to complete the sentence from comment #9)
There is a separate question of whether strings (as in arguments to string
functions like strlen) extend to arbitrary sequences of bytes regardless of the
object ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
--- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor ---
There is an ongoing effort to clarify the provenance of pointers in C. A
recent proposal for such clarification is N2219:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2219.htm
I don't see anything in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86246
--- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell ---
but myclass::operator double is not a template. why would we find it as a
specialization of the templated conversion operator? (to be clear, that maybe
what we want, but the temp.mem does not appear to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85994
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86261
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 86260 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86260
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86261
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86182
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jun 21 14:23:19 2018
New Revision: 261850
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261850&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/86182 - ICE with anonymous union passed to template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86260
Bug ID: 86260
Summary: [8/9 Regression] incorrect -Wformat-truncation warning
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86261
Andreas Stieger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||astieger at suse dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86175
--- Comment #5 from zenith432 at users dot sourceforge.net ---
This is a bug in ld.bfd. It's setting the resolution for entry symbols to
LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY_EXP instead of LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF. gold handles
them right.
I posted a patch in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70940
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86269
Bug ID: 86269
Summary: ICE with intermediate concepts notation
Product: gcc
Version: c++-concepts
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70940
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jun 21 14:01:11 2018
New Revision: 261849
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261849&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/70940 make pmr::resource_adaptor return aligned memory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86268
Bug ID: 86268
Summary: [9.0] Error on correct code with PDTs
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86192
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86266
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86246
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86266
Bug ID: 86266
Summary: [6 regression] r261799 causes failure on
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dse-16.c
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86267
Bug ID: 86267
Summary: detect conversions between bitmasks and vector masks
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86259
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86265
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86265
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86264
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85859
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Thu Jun 21 12:44:38 2018
New Revision: 261844
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261844&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[tail-merge] Fix side-effect test in stmt_local_def
2018-06-21 Tom de Vri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86265
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86265
Bug ID: 86265
Summary: Wrong code on an invalid code starting with r255790
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86256
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86232
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86264
Bug ID: 86264
Summary: [ARM] unsupported v2/v3 code remaining
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86263
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Christian Franke from comment #13)
> This patch prevents duplicate _S_empty_rep_storage[] even on Cygwin (char
> only, wchar_t missing). Testcase works as expected then:
>
> --- basic_string
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> If Cygwin doesn't correctly ensure uniqueness of static objects across DLLs
> then we can't workaround that,
Oops, typo, I meant to say we *can* work around
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86246
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
This no longer ices. and I am not sure the code is well formed. The code is
explicitly naming a conversion operator 'obj.operator T()', which is not the
same as relying on the conversion mechanism of 'stat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86232
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jun 21 11:22:12 2018
New Revision: 261843
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261843&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-21 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/86232
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86138
--- Comment #13 from Christian Franke ---
This patch prevents duplicate _S_empty_rep_storage[] even on Cygwin (char only,
wchar_t missing). Testcase works as expected then:
--- basic_string.tcc.orig 2018-05-03 06:22:46.0 +0200
+++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81410
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79920
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81410
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jun 21 11:18:50 2018
New Revision: 261842
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261842&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-21 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82108
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jun 21 11:18:50 2018
New Revision: 261842
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261842&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-21 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79920
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jun 21 11:18:50 2018
New Revision: 261842
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261842&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-21 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86246
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86249
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29027
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86250
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
