https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun May 27 03:22:11 2018
New Revision: 260802
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-26 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk.
PR l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun May 27 03:22:11 2018
New Revision: 260802
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-26 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85930
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85930
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85940
Bug ID: 85940
Summary: Address of label breaks ISO C++ program despite
non-GNU dialect and pedantic
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: reje
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85918
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat May 26 22:04:50 2018
New Revision: 260797
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260797&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/85918
* config/i386/i386.md (fixunssuffix, float
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85939
Bug ID: 85939
Summary: -mstackrealign does not realign stack with local __m64
variable
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85917
--- Comment #2 from Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis ---
Even such minor changes could be mentioned in that page for completeness.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85915
--- Comment #7 from Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis ---
Ebuild for GCC 7 branch is not available in Gentoo.
I guess that the relevant commit is:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=258647
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50909
Rudolf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rudolf.chrispens at web dot de
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
martchus at gmx dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martchus at gmx dot net
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85938
Bug ID: 85938
Summary: Spurious assert failure for matmul with reshaped array
Product: gcc
Version: 8.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on trunk. I think this should be backported as it is a regression I think
on 7 and 8 branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on trunk. If anyone thinks this should be backported as a regression,
let me know.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85906
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
2018-05-26 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/85906
* io/write.c (write_integer): Initialise the fnode format to
FMT_NONE, used for list directed write.
(BUF_STACK_SZ): Bump defa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85933
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85933
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85937
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat May 26 17:30:52 2018
New Revision: 260793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260793&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-26 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/85840
* i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85937
Bug ID: 85937
Summary: [9 Regression] Failures in the Ada tests
Product: gcc
Version: 9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Joshua Cogliati from comment #9)
--- snip ---
> I could look into either method of fixing this if you want. (And for what
> it is worth, I do have copyright assignment paperwork from both mysel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85918
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 44189
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44189&action=edit
gcc9-pr85918-2.patch
WIP fix for the rest, still need to write testcases and actually test it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85900
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85345
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat May 26 11:35:31 2018
New Revision: 260792
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260792&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't check ifunc_resolver on error
Since ifunc_resolver isn't se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85900
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat May 26 11:35:31 2018
New Revision: 260792
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260792&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't check ifunc_resolver on error
Since ifunc_resolver isn't se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85900
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This patch fixes the ICE and related problems I have spotted. Full testing
> in progress.
Back to "normal"!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85921
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
27 matches
Mail list logo
