[Bug libstdc++/85845] [9 Regression] Many libstdc++ test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85845 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/85865] [9 regression] Many libgomp fortran test cases fails starting with r260433

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85865 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Tue May 22 05:41:45 2018 New Revision: 260499 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260499&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-05-22 Janus Weil PR fortran/85841 * lib

[Bug c++/85867] New: Subscript operator applied to an temporary array results in an lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85867 Bug ID: 85867 Summary: Subscript operator applied to an temporary array results in an lvalue Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/85866] [8 Regression] too few arguments to function when sfinae on calling pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866 --- Comment #1 from Guillaume Racicot --- I tried some similar cases, and It seems it only happens when the expression `(std::declval().*std::declval())()` is inside template parameters. In the return type and normal function parameter it works a

[Bug c++/85866] New: [8 Regression] too few arguments to function when sfinae on calling pointer to member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85866 Bug ID: 85866 Summary: [8 Regression] too few arguments to function when sfinae on calling pointer to member function Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/25829] [F03] Asynchronous IO support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829 --- Comment #42 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Nicolas Koenig from comment #41) > Created attachment 44151 [details] > Next version of patch. --- snip --- > real0m15.465s > user0m15.313s > sys 0m0.152s > > With the "no" replace

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 --- Comment #8 from Mike Sharov --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > Your mental model of C++ is simply not how the language works. My mental model here is actually of const correctness, not C++ specifically. When I pass around a

[Bug c++/85864] [8/9 Regression] template argument string literal operator with default argument doesnt work in templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85864 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid CC|

[Bug c++/81930] [meta-bug] Issues with -Weffc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81930 Bug 81930 depends on bug 85858, which changed state. Bug 85858 Summary: -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85657] Make __ibm128 a separate type, even if long double uses the IBM double-double format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85657 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Mon May 21 22:25:03 2018 New Revision: 260490 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260490&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-05-21 Michael Meissner PR target/85657 * co

[Bug target/85657] Make __ibm128 a separate type, even if long double uses the IBM double-double format

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85657 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Mon May 21 22:21:40 2018 New Revision: 260489 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260489&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2018-05-21 Michael Meissner PR target/85657

[Bug c++/85861] g++ -Wconversion misses int to size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85861 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/85814] [8 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: strlen -O3 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85814 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE|[8 Regression] ICE

[Bug tree-optimization/85814] [8/9 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: strlen -O3 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85814 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Mon May 21 22:02:35 2018 New Revision: 260488 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260488&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix tree-ssa-strlen handling of partial clobbers (PR8581

[Bug fortran/85855] [7 Regression] (Maybe) uninitialized descriptor fields of an allocatable array component of a function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85855 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Fuka --- Yes, that is quite possible, although I tried to search first, because I had this problem without reporting for a long time, but may main compiler version to use was an older one so I didn't car that much fo

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 --- Comment #6 from Mike Sharov --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > Nope, see the C++ standard: > > [ Note: A pointer to a const type can be the operand of a > delete-expression; Ok, I guess; you have to follow the standard, a

[Bug fortran/85851] [8/9 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_structure Segmentation fault at trans-expr.c:7810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85851 Fritz Reese changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2018-05-20 00:

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Mon May 21 20:48:59 2018 New Revision: 260487 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260487&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-05-21 Janus Weil PR fortran/85841 PR te

[Bug testsuite/85865] [9 regression] Many libgomp fortran test cases fails starting with r260433

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85865 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Mon May 21 20:48:59 2018 New Revision: 260487 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260487&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-05-21 Janus Weil PR fortran/85841 PR te

[Bug testsuite/85865] [9 regression] Many libgomp fortran test cases fails starting with r260433

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85865 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/85865] [9 regression] Many libgomp fortran test cases fails starting with r260433

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85865 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug testsuite/85865] [9 regression] Many libgomp fortran test cases fails starting with r260433

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85865 --- Comment #1 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- r260433 | janus | 2018-05-21 01:45:55 -0500 (Mon, 21 May 2018) | 42 lines 2018-05-21 Janus Weil PR fortran/85841 * gfortran.dg/g77/19990826-3.f: Add option "-std=legacy".

[Bug testsuite/85865] New: [9 regression] Many libgomp fortran test cases fails starting with r260433

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85865 Bug ID: 85865 Summary: [9 regression] Many libgomp fortran test cases fails starting with r260433 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/84923] [8 regression] gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c failed on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84923 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Summar

[Bug target/84923] [8/9 regression] gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c failed on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84923 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon May 21 20:30:00 2018 New Revision: 260485 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260485&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR gcc/84923 * varasm.c (weak_finish): Clean up weak_decls.

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Nope, see the C++ standard: [ Note: A pointer to a const type can be the operand of a delete-expression; it is not necessary to cast away the constness (8.5.1.11) of the pointer expression before it

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 --- Comment #4 from Mike Sharov --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > Nothing stops you deallocating a const pointer. According to http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/memory/new/operator_delete The delete operator takes a void* and at

[Bug c++/85864] New: template argument string literal operator with default argument doesnt work in templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85864 Bug ID: 85864 Summary: template argument string literal operator with default argument doesnt work in templates Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/85852] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85852 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED C

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Mike Sharov from comment #2) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > > (In reply to Mike Sharov from comment #0) > > > When the pointer is const, it can not point to owned memory > >

[Bug c++/84588] [8 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (contains_struct_check())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84588 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9 Regression] internal |[8 Regression] internal

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 --- Comment #2 from Mike Sharov --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > (In reply to Mike Sharov from comment #0) > > When the pointer is const, it can not point to owned memory > Why not? Because a const pointer can not be freed. By

[Bug c++/85861] g++ -Wconversion misses int to size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85861 --- Comment #4 from Jonny Grant --- $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubun

[Bug c++/84588] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (contains_struct_check())

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84588 --- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon May 21 19:25:50 2018 New Revision: 260482 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260482&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2018-05-21 Paolo Carlini PR c++/84588

[Bug c++/85861] g++ -Wconversion misses int to size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85861 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/85863] New: [9 Regression] ICE in compiling spec2006 fortran test case solib.fppized.f starting with r260283

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85863 Bug ID: 85863 Summary: [9 Regression] ICE in compiling spec2006 fortran test case solib.fppized.f starting with r260283 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/85862] New: infinite loop in find_base_term()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85862 Bug ID: 85862 Summary: infinite loop in find_base_term() Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimizatio

[Bug c++/85861] g++ -Wconversion misses int to size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85861 --- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant --- Thank you for your replies. I tested on 64bit ubuntu. But yes with -Wsign-conversion I now see the warnings/errors. Could it be enabled by default? to match C behaviour visible in GCC.

[Bug fortran/85855] [7 Regression] (Maybe) uninitialized descriptor fields of an allocatable array component of a function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85855 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/22406] -Weffc++ warns about missing op= and copy ctor, even when base classes have already disabled these

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22406 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msharov at users dot sourceforge.n

[Bug c++/81930] [meta-bug] Issues with -Weffc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81930 Bug 81930 depends on bug 85856, which changed state. Bug 85856 Summary: -Weffc++ can't see implicitly deleted constructor https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85856 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/85856] -Weffc++ can't see implicitly deleted constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85856 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/85858] -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Mike Sharov from comment #0) > When the pointer is const, it can not point to owned memory Why not?

[Bug c++/85861] g++ -Wconversion misses int to size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85861 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/85769] [8/9 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2205 for -mcpu=thunderx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85769 --- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina --- I have a patch to add the missing case, but that'll just mask the reload bug, so I'm holding up on posting it while looking at reload.

[Bug libstdc++/85845] [9 Regression] Many libstdc++ test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85845 --- Comment #2 from François Dumont --- Author: fdumont Date: Mon May 21 16:51:47 2018 New Revision: 260478 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260478&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-05-21 François Dumont PR libstdc++/85845 * in

[Bug tree-optimization/85698] [8/9 Regression] CPU2017 525.x264_r fails starting with r257581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85698 --- Comment #13 from Pat Haugen --- Author: pthaugen Date: Mon May 21 16:41:09 2018 New Revision: 260477 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260477&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/85698 * gcc.target/powerpc/vec-setup-be-long.c:

[Bug tree-optimization/85698] [8/9 Regression] CPU2017 525.x264_r fails starting with r257581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85698 --- Comment #12 from Pat Haugen --- Author: pthaugen Date: Mon May 21 16:34:44 2018 New Revision: 260476 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260476&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/85698 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_output_m

[Bug tree-optimization/85698] [8/9 Regression] CPU2017 525.x264_r fails starting with r257581

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85698 --- Comment #11 from Pat Haugen --- Author: pthaugen Date: Mon May 21 16:23:20 2018 New Revision: 260475 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260475&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/85698 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_output_m

[Bug c++/85861] New: g++ -Wconversion misses int to size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85861 Bug ID: 85861 Summary: g++ -Wconversion misses int to size_t Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/85860] New: [8/9 Regression] ICE: in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.c:1810: unable to find a register to spill with -flive-range-shrinkage -mbmi2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85860 Bug ID: 85860 Summary: [8/9 Regression] ICE: in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.c:1810: unable to find a register to spill with -flive-range-shrinkage -mbmi2 Product:

[Bug tree-optimization/85859] New: [6/7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85859 Bug ID: 85859 Summary: [6/7/8/9 Regression] wrong code with -fno-isolate-erroneous-paths-dereference Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wro

[Bug c++/85858] New: -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85858 Bug ID: 85858 Summary: -Weffc++ should not require copy ctor for const pointers Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug other/85857] New: configure problem using local mpfr and gmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85857 Bug ID: 85857 Summary: configure problem using local mpfr and gmp Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other

[Bug c++/85856] New: -Weffc++ can't see implicitly deleted constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85856 Bug ID: 85856 Summary: -Weffc++ can't see implicitly deleted constructor Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/85855] New: [7 Regression] (Maybe) uninitialized descriptor fields of an allocatable array component of a function result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85855 Bug ID: 85855 Summary: [7 Regression] (Maybe) uninitialized descriptor fields of an allocatable array component of a function result Product: gcc Version: 7.3.1 Status: U

[Bug libstdc++/81771] __basic_file::sys_open is not a reserved name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81771 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- *** Bug 70727 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libstdc++/70727] Non-reserved names in std::__basic_file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70727 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/85832] [AVX512] possible shorter code when comparing with vector of zeros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85832 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug target/45996] -falign-functions=X does not work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45996 Denis Vlasenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vda.linux at googlemail dot com --- Com

[Bug middle-end/66240] RFE: extend -falign-xyz syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66240 --- Comment #7 from Denis Vlasenko --- Patch v8 https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg00792.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg00793.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-04/msg00794.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc

[Bug libstdc++/85818] [8/9 Regression] undefined reference to `std::experimental::filesystem::v1::__cxx11::path::preferred_separator'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85818 --- Comment #9 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks!

[Bug c/85854] New: Performance regression from gcc 4.9.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85854 Bug ID: 85854 Summary: Performance regression from gcc 4.9.2 Product: gcc Version: 8.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libstdc++/85818] [8/9 Regression] undefined reference to `std::experimental::filesystem::v1::__cxx11::path::preferred_separator'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85818 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon May 21 12:29:33 2018 New Revision: 260440 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260440&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/85818 make new test require Filesystem support PR l

[Bug libstdc++/85818] [8/9 Regression] undefined reference to `std::experimental::filesystem::v1::__cxx11::path::preferred_separator'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85818 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/85818] [8/9 Regression] undefined reference to `std::experimental::filesystem::v1::__cxx11::path::preferred_separator'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85818 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/85818] [8/9 Regression] undefined reference to `std::experimental::filesystem::v1::__cxx11::path::preferred_separator'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85818 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon May 21 12:27:00 2018 New Revision: 260439 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260439&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/85818 make new test require Filesystem support PR l

[Bug target/85832] [AVX512] possible shorter code when comparing with vector of zeros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85832 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/85818] [8/9 Regression] undefined reference to `std::experimental::filesystem::v1::__cxx11::path::preferred_separator'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85818 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libstdc++/85818] [8/9 Regression] undefined reference to `std::experimental::filesystem::v1::__cxx11::path::preferred_separator'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85818 sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sudi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug target/85666] gcc-8.0.1 fails to build mmix target: gcc/libgcc/libgcc2.h:203:20: internal compiler error: in leaf_function_p, at final.c:4488

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85666 --- Comment #8 from Wilco --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #7) > Thank you for your interest in the MMIX port. > > (In reply to Wilco from comment #3) > > (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #1) > > > > > #define MMIX_

[Bug c/85850] [9.0 Regression] gcc 9.0 doesn't compile with Xcode 9.3.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85850 --- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter --- Sorry, I meant Marc, of course. Confused this was another PR. (In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #3) > Indeed, Janne is correct, this change in libcpp/system.h solves the problem, > i.e. moving the de

[Bug target/82855] AVX512: replace OP+movemask with OP_mask+ktest

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82855 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wojciech_mula at poczta dot onet.p

[Bug target/85833] [AVX512] use mask registers instructions instead of scalar code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85833 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/85850] [9.0 Regression] gcc 9.0 doesn't compile with Xcode 9.3.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85850 --- Comment #3 from Jürgen Reuter --- Indeed, Janne is correct, this change in libcpp/system.h solves the problem, i.e. moving the definition up: # diff -u system.h system.h.260425 --- system.h2018-05-20 23:00:01.0 +0200 +++ system.

[Bug tree-optimization/85853] ICE in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:10233 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85853 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/85853] New: ICE in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:10233 on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85853 Bug ID: 85853 Summary: ICE in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:10233 on ppc64le Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid

[Bug rtl-optimization/85852] [9 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault (in contains_struct_check)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85852 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/85841] [F2018] reject deleted features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85841 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- The diagnostics for the deleted features have been implemented in r260433. As a minor follow-up, one should get rid of the GFC_STD_F2008_TS macro and make -std=f2008ts an alias for -std=f2018.