https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85128
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85039
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85027
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85128
Bug ID: 85128
Summary: Local scope type(def) falsely assumed to change
meaning of outer scope type(def)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85127
Bug ID: 85127
Summary: Members implementation outside class doesn't compile
if class name is an alias from a using
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85126
Bug ID: 85126
Summary: [8 regression] gcc.target/powerpc/pr69946.c fails on
powerpc64 BE starting with r254213
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85125
Bug ID: 85125
Summary: constant expression with const_cast UB does not emit
error
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
With r258935 I get
% gfc pr52789.f90 -Wunused-parameter
pr52789.f90:2:23:
integer, parameter :: i = 0
1
Warning: Unused parameter 'i' declared at (1) [-Wunused-parameter]
% g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85124
Bug ID: 85124
Summary: template template parameter is printed incorrectly in
the error message
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83964
--- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool ---
There were various issues with the builtins. We could have made them work
for just (say) power8 and up, in time for GCC 8, but then for a long time no
one would be able to use __builtin_fcti[wd] on oth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Mar 29 20:43:48 2018
New Revision: 258966
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258966&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
More #include suggestions (PR c++/84269)
PR c++/84269 reports a numbe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85123
Bug ID: 85123
Summary: [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/pr63594-2.c begins
failing with r254862
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85075
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71991
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5)
> Created attachment 43798 [details]
> proposed fix
>
>
> this patch simply while-lists some transitions of target flags for always
> inline functions. It is ugly bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85093
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 29 19:38:41 2018
New Revision: 258964
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258964&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85093 - too many template args with pack expansion.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85060
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 29 19:38:29 2018
New Revision: 258962
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258962&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85060 - wrong-code with call to base member in template.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85090
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43802
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43802&action=edit
gcc8-pr85090-wip.patch
Untested WIP; some more work is needed to get rid of the useless vextracti32x4
$0, ... i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85111
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid |patch
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60790
--- Comment #10 from Florian Weimer ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-03/msg01546.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
--- Comment #17 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
I'll clarify why I think load() should be allowed to issue writes on the
memory. According to [atomics.types.operations]/18 in N4713,
compare_exchange_*() is a load operation if the comparison fails,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
--- Comment #16 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to andysem from comment #12)
> Is read-only memory a valid use case for __atomic intrinsics anyway? These
> intrinsics are primarily targeted to implement std::atomic,
I strongly disagree about t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84985
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Mar 29 18:29:12 2018
New Revision: 258961
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258961&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-29 Vladimir Makarov
PR inline-asm/84985
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
--- Comment #15 from crc at winterflaw dot net ---
On 29/03/18 19:23, andysem at mail dot ru wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
>
> --- Comment #14 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
>> On Intel, all CAS operations always wr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83964
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The main issue of the builtins that have been reverted was that it was too tied
to a particular HW instruction, if the hw instruction doesn't exist, don't
support it (and this wasn't working properly, it was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
--- Comment #14 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
> On Intel, all CAS operations always write, even if thr compare failed.
I understand that. The question is whether this is allowed behavior for
atd::atomic::load() operation according to the C++ st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85102
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83707
acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83707
--- Comment #5 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can also confirm with trunk 258957 I do not see this fail with -m32
-mcpu=power7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84914
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Mar 29 17:04:34 2018
New Revision: 258959
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258959&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2018-03-29 Michael Meissner
Back port from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85122
--- Comment #3 from 慕冬亮 ---
At first, I reported it in bugzilla of
binutils(https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23008). The developer
said it should be the issue of C++ demangle code and GCC maintains this
component. He advised me to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85122
--- Comment #2 from 慕冬亮 ---
Created attachment 43801
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43801&action=edit
Dockerfile for Debian Stable (GCC with AddressSanitizer)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85122
--- Comment #1 from 慕冬亮 ---
Created attachment 43800
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43800&action=edit
PoC to trigger stack exhaustion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85122
Bug ID: 85122
Summary: Stack Overflow(Stack Exhaustion) in demangle related
functions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83964
--- Comment #18 from Steven Munroe ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #17)
> And, when long is 64-bit, there is no corresponding standard function to
> round to 32-bit integer with "invalid" raised for out-of-range results -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83964
--- Comment #17 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
And, when long is 64-bit, there is no corresponding standard function to
round to 32-bit integer with "invalid" raised for out-of-range results -
but there is (undocumented) __builtin_irin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
--- Comment #13 from toby at winterflaw dot net ---
On 29 Mar 2018, andysem at mail dot ru wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
>
>--- Comment #12 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
>Is read-only memory a valid use case for __a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74762
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefan.hertrampf at gmx dot de
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85119
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83964
--- Comment #16 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
These instructions use the current rounding mode, not round-to-zero.
That is, they correspond to the lrint / llrint functions, given
-fno-math-errno.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84783
--- Comment #4 from speryt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: speryt
Date: Thu Mar 29 14:51:03 2018
New Revision: 258958
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258958&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-29 Sebastian Peryt
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84818
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85110
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Mar 29 14:43:01 2018
New Revision: 258957
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258957&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
More underlining of bad arguments (PR c++/85110)
As of r256448, the C+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85117
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If the class itself doesn't have > 32-bit alignment, yes.
It informs you that if you pass it by value, it will not be interoperable with
G++ older than 7.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
--- Comment #12 from andysem at mail dot ru ---
Is read-only memory a valid use case for __atomic intrinsics anyway? These
intrinsics are primarily targeted to implement std::atomic, but does the
standard guarantee these operations (primarily, std
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71991
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85117
--- Comment #3 from linzj ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> It is not a warning, just a message, and it is completely correct, older G++
> versions would pass objects with such types differently than 7.1+.
What? Any pass-by-value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83964
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Why aren't just C cast from float/double to int/long enough?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83964
--- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt ---
The functions are broken, and a release is imminent. This will be revisited in
the next release, and backports considered at least for Advance Toolchain.
Time and resources are finite...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84914
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84947
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84947
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
>
> Does IPA-CP in any way handle jump functions of float types?
It does not create any jump functions tracking individual bits, we
only create that part of jump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60790
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83964
--- Comment #13 from Steven Munroe ---
WTF which part of requirement did you not understand.
You you should implement the direct moves (to GPRs) to complete the
__builtin_fctid and __builtin_fctiw implementation.
But to just remove them is mis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85100
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Mar 29 13:14:06 2018
New Revision: 258954
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258954&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386: Enable AVX/AVX512 features only if supported by OSXSAVE
Enab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85119
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85117
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84995
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71991
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dilyan.palauzov at aegee dot
org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84926
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84995
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Mar 29 13:02:23 2018
New Revision: 258953
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258953&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Documentation tweaks.
2018-03-29 Martin Liska
PR lto/84995.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84993
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84791
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83126
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85121
Bug ID: 85121
Summary: Assembler messages: Error: operand out of range (264
is not between 0 and 248)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85117
--- Comment #1 from linzj ---
Please note that the 64 bit alignment require comes from the typedef, not the
base.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85118
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79085
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Fixed for 8.1+ so far.
Hi Jakub,
Are you planning to do a backport?
Best regards.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85120
Bug ID: 85120
Summary: __get_cpuid
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85111
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
--- Comment #14 from Peter Rabbitson ---
On 03/29/2018 01:35 PM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Can you please describe what exactly do you instrument? Is it a Perl package,
> or a firebird?
The failcase I provided in my first involvement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Peter Rabbitson from comment #12)
> On 03/29/2018 12:21 PM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
> >
> > --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85119
Bug ID: 85119
Summary: __builtin_expect() shadows warning
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84926
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85108
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 29 11:18:04 2018
New Revision: 258952
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258952&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/85108
* g++.dg/warn/Wunused-var-31.C: New test.
Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85108
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85118
Bug ID: 85118
Summary: Error when using std::bind with a generic lambda -
"cannot bind 'const volatile char&' to an rvalue of
type 'const volatile char'"
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85094
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85094
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 29 10:37:58 2018
New Revision: 258950
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258950&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/85094
* fold-const.c (operand_equal_p): Handle DEBUG_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
--- Comment #12 from Peter Rabbitson ---
On 03/29/2018 12:21 PM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
>
> --- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
> (In reply to Peter Rabbitson from comment #10)
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Peter Rabbitson from comment #10)
> On 03/29/2018 11:27 AM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry but I don't have Fedora system, I have only openSUSE. And there I
> > don't have an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
--- Comment #10 from Peter Rabbitson ---
On 03/29/2018 11:27 AM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> I'm sorry but I don't have Fedora system, I have only openSUSE. And there I
> don't have any firebird-*devel package.
>
The steps are for Ubu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85114
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Klausner ---
Here's the requested output:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/scratch/mail/thunderbird/work/.gcc/bin/g++
Target: x86_64--netbsd
Configured with: /usr/src/tools/gcc/../../external/gpl3/gcc/dist/configure
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85113
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84762
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tamar.christina at arm dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
--- Comment #14 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sudi
Date: Thu Mar 29 09:27:53 2018
New Revision: 258949
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258949&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM][PR target/84826] Fix ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Peter Rabbitson from comment #8)
> On 03/29/2018 10:57 AM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
> >
> > --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85106
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #9 from Tom de Vries -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
--- Comment #13 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sudi
Date: Thu Mar 29 09:19:45 2018
New Revision: 258948
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258948&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM][PR target/84826] Fix ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84826
sudi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.4.1, 7.3.1
--- Comment #12 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70345
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 84934 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84934
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
--- Comment #8 from Peter Rabbitson ---
On 03/29/2018 10:57 AM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
>
> --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
> So I rewrote it to a shell script:
>
> ...
>
> I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84428
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
So I rewrote it to a shell script:
$ cat ./todo.sh
ASAN_FLAGS_COMMON="-fsanitize=address -fuse-ld=gold -fno-omit-frame-pointer -g
-O2"
CC=gcc-7
CXX=g++-7
sudo bash -c 'cat odbc_extra_config >> /etc/odbcinst.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84606
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84606
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Mar 29 08:43:43 2018
New Revision: 258947
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258947&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-29 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/84606
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85113
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85108
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85112
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Version|unknown
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
