https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84746
Bug ID: 84746
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
--- Comment #18 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Mar 7 07:50:57 2018
New Revision: 258313
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258313&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84684
* constexpr.c (cxx_bind_parameters_in_cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744
--- Comment #6 from Peter VARGA ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5)
> That's not how you use a different glibc. If you look at the include order
> printed by -v, it has to remain in that order (libstdc++ before glibc, in
> particular),
/home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:1679
0x32f0b70 build_gimple_cfg
/home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:240
0x32f0b70 execute_build_cfg
/home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:410
0x32f0b70 execute
/home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c:446
$ xgcc --version
xgcc (GCC) 8.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
That's not how you use a different glibc. If you look at the include order
printed by -v, it has to remain in that order (libstdc++ before glibc, in
particular), whereas you are adding your glibc in front. Best
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57197
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56818
Bug 56818 depends on bug 57197, which changed state.
Bug 57197 Summary: [Fortran-Dev][Regression] ICE in record_reference, at
cgraphbuild.c:66
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57197
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57197
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550
--- Comment #13 from Kevin Buettner ---
(In reply to Kevin Buettner from comment #11)
> This code, which is in find_pc_partial_function_gnu_ifunc(), incorrectly
> identifies this address, 0x400590, as belonging to qux:
>
> if (mapped_pc >= ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64107
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 64107, which changed state.
Bug 64107 Summary: [F95] Pure function as array size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64107
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64107
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Mar 7 00:25:30 2018
New Revision: 258311
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258311&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-06 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/64107
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550
--- Comment #12 from Kevin Buettner ---
I'll note, too, that just setting a breakpoint on qux and then looking at the
locations reveals another problem...
(gdb) b qux
Breakpoint 1 at 0x400460: qux. (2 locations)
(gdb) info break
Num Type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550
--- Comment #11 from Kevin Buettner ---
I've simplified Jakub's example slightly:
--- vau2.c ---
struct A { int a; };
struct B { struct A *b; };
struct C { struct B *c; };
__attribute__((noipa)) bool
foo (struct A *p)
{
return false;
}
__att
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
Bug 66128 depends on bug 84697, which changed state.
Bug 84697 Summary: [8 Regression] minloc/maxloc not simplified with zero size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Mar 6 23:50:01 2018
New Revision: 258305
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258305&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84697
PR fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Mar 6 23:50:01 2018
New Revision: 258305
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258305&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84697
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744
--- Comment #4 from Peter VARGA ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> >-I /FaF/glibc/include
>
> Use -isystem instead or a true sysroot instead.
Can you post the full g++ command line options how you mean it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744
--- Comment #3 from Peter VARGA ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> >-I /FaF/glibc/include
>
> Use -isystem instead or a true sysroot instead.
Sorry, but this does not help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744
--- Comment #2 from Peter VARGA ---
Sorry, but this does not help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>-I /FaF/glibc/include
Use -isystem instead or a true sysroot instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84744
Bug ID: 84744
Summary: cannot use glibc 2.27 with gcc 7.3
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64124
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550
--- Comment #10 from Pedro Alves ---
It sounds that way, but I haven't verified, e.g., by trying older versions of
gdb, and/or bisecting.
Kevin, in addition to trying older versions of gdb with
freorder-blocks-and-partition, I'm curious about wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84677
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84601
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84601
--- Comment #3 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ville
Date: Tue Mar 6 21:43:03 2018
New Revision: 258304
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258304&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/84601
* include/std/optional (_Optional_payload): S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79937
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #16)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> > E.g. could we walk into TARGET_EXPRs that have TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL
> > AGGR_INIT_EXPR, but avoid those that hav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84740
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83969
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|segher at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84684
--- Comment #17 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 6 21:11:46 2018
New Revision: 258303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84684
* constexpr.c (cxx_bind_parameters_in_cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64107
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84710
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84721
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:57:30 2018
New Revision: 258302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258302&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/84721
* c-parser.c (add_debug_begin_stmt): Don't add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84710
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:41:37 2018
New Revision: 258301
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258301&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/84710
* combine.c (try_combine): Use reg_or_sub
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84740
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80551
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:07:49 2018
New Revision: 258300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258300&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r257932
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80589
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:07:18 2018
New Revision: 258298
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258298&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r257803
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84310
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:07:38 2018
New Revision: 258299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258299&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r257842
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79747
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:07:38 2018
New Revision: 258299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258299&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r257842
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:06:45 2018
New Revision: 258296
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258296&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r257383
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84137
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:06:56 2018
New Revision: 258297
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258297&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r257384
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81440
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:06:29 2018
New Revision: 258295
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258295&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r256989
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82675
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:06:10 2018
New Revision: 258294
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258294&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r255818
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79455
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:05:52 2018
New Revision: 258293
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258293&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r247342
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84229
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:04:36 2018
New Revision: 258290
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258290&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r257877
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81360
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:04:20 2018
New Revision: 258289
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258289&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r257490
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81004
--- Comment #27 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:02:22 2018
New Revision: 258287
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258287&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r257412
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83954
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:01:44 2018
New Revision: 258285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258285&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r257183
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83954
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:02:03 2018
New Revision: 258286
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258286&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r257343
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84743
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84743
Bug ID: 84743
Summary: default widths for parallel reassociation now hurt
rather than help
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Mar 6 19:30:41 2018
New Revision: 258283
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258283&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-06 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/56667
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Mar 6 19:27:48 2018
New Revision: 258282
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258282&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-06 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/56667
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79937
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> E.g. could we walk into TARGET_EXPRs that have TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL
> AGGR_INIT_EXPR, but avoid those that have TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL a CONSTRUCTOR,
> or a CONSTRU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82982
--- Comment #8 from Will Schmidt ---
(In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #6)
> (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Will Schmidt from comment #4)
> > > Tried to re-create locally, I've gotten two ICE's using the provid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56667
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Mar 6 19:05:48 2018
New Revision: 258281
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258281&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-06 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/56667
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84371
Will Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c
me/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/ira.c:5465
0x2608794 execute
/home/vegard/git/gcc/gcc/ira.c:5649
$ xgcc --version
xgcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180306 (experimental)
Built from git 11a93d7a09b871b3b9a2eb108eb91ad83d94e070 (r258271).
This one is a bit of a weird one. It doesn't reproduce with "trunk"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83748
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84741
Bug ID: 84741
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in ix86_expand_prologue, at
config/i386/i386.c:13893
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84521
--- Comment #16 from sudi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So I think I would go with Jakub's suggestion of defining calls_builtin_setjmp
and use that in aarch64_layout_frame for cfun->machine->frame.emit_frame_chain.
I am still investigating Wilco's concer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84740
Bug ID: 84740
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in build_constructors, at
tree-switch-conversion.c:965
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739
Bug ID: 84739
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in get_value_for_expr, at
tree-ssa-ccp.c:649
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84739
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Configured with --enable-checking=yes :
$ gcc-8-20180304 -O2 -c z1.c
z1.c:1:13: warning: 'baz' alias between functions of incompatible types
'void(void)' and 'void(int, int)' [-Wattribute-alias]
static vo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84738
Bug ID: 84738
Summary: stack-overflow in regex_match
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70431
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70431
Raphael Kubo da Costa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||raphael.kubo.da.costa@intel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84732
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> I guess it somehow confuses VRP, Martin can you please take a look? Note
> that __builtin___sanitizer_cov_trace_pc is pure function, can't modify
> memory in origi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84732
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
In general, by inserting their instrumentation the sanitizers cause all sorts
of trouble for middle-end warnings. The usual answer has been to disable
-Werror when using -fsanitize. Personally, I think that'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84737
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84737
Bug ID: 84737
Summary: 20% degradation in CPU2000 172.mgrid starting with
r256888
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84736
Bug ID: 84736
Summary: When compiling with -g -O2 internal compiler error: in
force_type_die, at dwarf2out.c:25111
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
My limited understanding is this is a GDB bug and that it basically never
worked properly with -freorder-blocks-and-partition. So not really sure how we
could work around it in GCC. Pedro, do you agree?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81572
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81764
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81572
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
Author: bergner
Date: Tue Mar 6 15:54:30 2018
New Revision: 258280
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258280&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2018-02-22 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80791
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79937
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43578
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43578&action=edit
gcc8-pr79937.patch
Actually, seems TREE_HAS_CONSTRUCTOR is set on a CONSTRUCTOR only by
finish_compound_litera
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80511
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84729
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84650
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84610
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84565
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84552
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84550
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug |testsuite
--- Comment #3 from Richard B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84345
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84301
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84251
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84719
Manuel Lauss changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manuel.lauss at googlemail dot
com
--- C
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
