https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84433
Bug ID: 84433
Summary: gcc 7 and before miscompile loop and remove exit due
to incorrect range calculation
Product: gcc
Version: 7.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83911
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 43445
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43445&action=edit
patch
The problem here is that we're substituting a dispatcher function for a
constructor, and the dispatcher f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84432
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Detect illegal component|[F08] Detect illegal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84389
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84412
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84432
Bug ID: 84432
Summary: Detect illegal component initialization in pdt_27.f03
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84431
Bug ID: 84431
Summary: Suboptimal code for masked shifts (x86/x86-64)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84430
Bug ID: 84430
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp simd in lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84429
Bug ID: 84429
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE capturing variable-sized array
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84139
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Di Bella ---
It appears this is now compiling on trunk: https://godbolt.org/g/L9igrS.
Thanks.
Is it safe to close this issue yet?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84361
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82996
--- Comment #9 from Neil Carlson ---
With today's version (r257782) I'm still seeing the same thing Dominique
reported in comment 7, except that there is no longer any abort -- the programs
terminate successfully (0 exit code) despite the reporte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84270
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2018-02-17
Resolution|FIXED |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
FAIL: g++.dg/template/overload15.C -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20180217/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84270
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Feb 17 16:01:50 2018
New Revision: 257784
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257784&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-17 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84270
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Feb 17 15:53:07 2018
New Revision: 257783
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257783&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-17 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84270
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81797
--- Comment #60 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #59)
> Should be fixed on trunk, please test and confirm.
Confirmed fixed on trunk. Many thanks.
Could you please backport to gcc-7-branch and gcc-6-bran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84094
Bug 84094 depends on bug 84381, which changed state.
Bug 84381 Summary: replace non-std 'call abort' by 'stop 1' in gfortran
testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84381
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Neil Carlson from comment #5)
> Thomas, I saw you generated a patch with "stop n". I'd love to see how you
> did it -- the regexp and counting magic.
At first, I tried to find the all-inclusive
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84423
--- Comment #2 from Volker Reichelt ---
I can still reproduce the crash with a clean trunk from 2 hours ago (r257780).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84115
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84115
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Fixed on trunk, thanks for the report.
Paul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84115
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Feb 17 11:07:32 2018
New Revision: 257781
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257781&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/84115
* resolve.c (res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82965
bin.cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=74600
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70713
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67899
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
28 matches
Mail list logo
