https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84354
Bug ID: 84354
Summary: Replace '%qs' with %qs in fortran/decl.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84353
Bug ID: 84353
Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in set_codegen_error, at
graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:206
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84316
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|lto |tree-optimization
--- Comment #3 from Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84207
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83760
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Feb 13 03:07:04 2018
New Revision: 257611
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257611&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83760
* config/sh/sh.c (find_barrier): Consider a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84348
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84349
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83760
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8 Regression] [SH] ICE in |[7/8 Regression] [SH] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78459
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83760
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 78459 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84318
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80863
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83760
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83760
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebastian.huber@embedded-br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83785
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84279
--- Comment #6 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #5)
> I think you should do this check inside address_offset?
I don't think that is possible. The callers of address_offset assume if
address_offset returns a no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84352
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84352
Bug ID: 84352
Summary: noreturn function previously declared without the
attribute accepted
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84351
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to jpakkane from comment #0)
> If linking supported generating dependency files like -M does for source
> compilations, this would not be a problem and
... and?
The main problem is that GCC does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84351
Bug ID: 84351
Summary: Provide dependency information also when linking
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84325
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|jason at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67054
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84325
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84341
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84341
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 12 22:25:41 2018
New Revision: 257607
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257607&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/84341
* parser.c (cp_parser_binary_expression): Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84279
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
I think you should do this check inside address_offset?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #5 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Beside the patch configure files have to be regenerated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84148
--- Comment #4 from igor.v.tsimbalist at intel dot com ---
Created attachment 43400
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43400&action=edit
patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84338
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
See A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84347
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Both Clang and Intel ICC behave as expected:
t.C(3): warning #1478: class "A" (declared at line 1) was declared
deprecated
A aci; // -Wdeprecated-declarations (good)
^
t.C(11): warning #147
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84279
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
This actually seems to be a constraint problem caused by mem_operand_gpr()
which implements the "Y" constraint (ie, mem's ok for GPR load/stores) allowing
altivec type addresses that contain the 'and' like we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84340
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80863
--- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #4)
> We would need the cpp output to thoroughly analyze this. You can get the
> cpp output using "-save-temps" on the comment line and passing along the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63435
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Let's keep this open to see if any platform develops a regression
with the fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80863
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68126
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84350
Bug ID: 84350
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE with new and auto
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 12 20:51:16 2018
New Revision: 257605
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257605&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68746
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68746
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 12 20:48:32 2018
New Revision: 257604
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257604&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68746
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67054
--- Comment #8 from Leonid Koppel ---
Fixed in 7.2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84349
Bug ID: 84349
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with auto in function cast
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80174
Bug 80174 depends on bug 68560, which changed state.
Bug 68560 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now
fails when compiled with -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68649
Bug 68649 depends on bug 68560, which changed state.
Bug 68560 Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now
fails when compiled with -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
--- Comment #30 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 12 20:27:11 2018
New Revision: 257603
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257603&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68560
* trans-i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84348
Bug ID: 84348
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE with invalid friend declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
--- Comment #29 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Feb 12 20:13:30 2018
New Revision: 257602
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257602&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68560
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84347
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84347
Bug ID: 84347
Summary: attribute deprecated on a class partial specialization
has no effect
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84341
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84334
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
With -frounding-math, CCP produces things like:
_465 = 9.99974752427078783512115478515625e-7 +
4.99873689375817775726318359375e-6;
Guessing:
When we have cst1+cst2+cst3, the transformation gives cst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84215
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
I just committed a patch that may affect some of these failures. Please let me
know if you notice any change. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84215
--- Comment #6 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Feb 12 18:50:16 2018
New Revision: 257599
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257599&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/84215
runtime, sync/atomic: use write barrier for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84346
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84346
Bug ID: 84346
Summary: Statement functions should not accept keywords
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84338
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35299
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54223
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35299
--- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Feb 12 18:26:44 2018
New Revision: 257597
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257597&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Francois-Xavier Coudert
PR fortran/35299
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276
--- Comment #17 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Feb 12 18:25:41 2018
New Revision: 257596
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257596&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/54223
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54223
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Feb 12 18:25:41 2018
New Revision: 257596
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257596&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/54223
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84345
Bug ID: 84345
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: qsort checking failed (error:
qsort comparator non-negative on sorted output: 1)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84344
Bug ID: 84344
Summary: [concepts] ICE with invalid use of auto
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84336
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 43398
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43398&action=edit
gcc8-pr84336.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35299
--- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Feb 12 18:08:02 2018
New Revision: 257594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257594&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Francois-Xavier Coudert
PR fortran/35299
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54223
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Feb 12 18:04:33 2018
New Revision: 257593
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257593&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/54223
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276
--- Comment #16 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Feb 12 18:04:33 2018
New Revision: 257593
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257593&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/54223
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84010
--- Comment #7 from James Clarke ---
Eric, does the patch look fine to you? Do you want me to submit it to the
mailing list, or is here ok?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, wrong-debug
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84343
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84313
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63793
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84336
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84343
Bug ID: 84343
Summary: Behavior of ARM register constraint 't' seems to be
inconsistent with documentation
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84318
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342
--- Comment #1 from Tamar Christina ---
native builds do seem to work, it's all the cross builds that seem to be
broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61048
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|Location views b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84342
Bug ID: 84342
Summary: Location views breaks cross and native builds of arm
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84341
Bug ID: 84341
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE with #pragma omp atomic
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, openmp
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84094
Bug 84094 depends on bug 84273, which changed state.
Bug 84273 Summary: [F03] Reject allocatable passed-object dummy argument
(proc_ptr_47.f90)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84273
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84273
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84273
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Feb 12 17:11:58 2018
New Revision: 257590
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257590&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-12 Janus Weil
PR fortran/84273
* res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84340
Bug ID: 84340
Summary: [8 regression] g++.dg/asan/use-after-scope-types-1.C
(and others) fails after r257585
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68374
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83758
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.4 |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83758
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84333
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84335
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84338
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84339
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84336
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
Version|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84333
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo