https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83636
Bug ID: 83636
Summary: libffi/mips/n32: don't .set mips4 for mips r6
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83635
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Summary|Cygwin build erro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69777
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83635
Bug ID: 83635
Summary: Cygwin build error: i386.c
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943
--- Comment #3 from Darrell Reich ---
Found relevant section of Fortran specification
4.5.1 Derived-type definition
R429 derived-type-def is derived-type-stmt
[ type-param-def-stmt ] ...
[ private-or-sequence ] ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82943
--- Comment #2 from Darrell Reich ---
Debug backtrace
find . -iname '*.c' -type f -exec grep -inH --color ‘Error' {} \;
% gdb ~/c/work/compiler/build-gcc/gcc/f951
(gdb) break error.c:517
(gdb) run -Wall ~/c/work/workspace4/Test02/test.f90
(gdb) b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81939
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Did this get fixed or is it another issue from the buffer overflow by one I
already fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 42992
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42992&action=edit
A peliminary patch
The attached patch allows the test cases to compile and run. Remaining is to
formulate what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82428
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 42991
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42991&action=edit
Tentative patch, tested on host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83634
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Fruzynski ---
A bit simpler test case which triggers this ICE:
[code]
void test()
{
const int foo = Foo();
short n;
for (n = foo; n < 100; ++n) {}
}
[/code]
was playing with Compiler Explorer (https://godbolt.org/) and got this ICE
when compiling code above. g++ version reported by Compiler Explorer is g++
8.0.0 20171230.
[x86-64 gcc (trunk) #1] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class
'type', have 'exceptiona
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83522
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The expression strings(:)(:) is invalid fortran. F2008 R610.
R610 parent-string is scalar-variable-name
or array-element
or scalar-structure-component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
Bug ID: 83633
Summary: gfortran internal compiler error for explicit-shape
array with non-constant bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83632
Bug ID: 83632
Summary: pdt_26.f03:29:0: internal compiler error: in
final_scan_insn, at final.c:3063
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83632
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
tstrap-nographite-powerpc
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20171230 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82410
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeanmichael.celerier@gmail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83630
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83630
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83630
Bug ID: 83630
Summary: GCC 7.2.1: ICE in replace_placeholders_r, at
cp/tree.c:2796
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83629
Bug ID: 83629
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE: in decompose_normal_address, at
rtlanal.c:6329 with -O2 -fPIC -frename-registers
--param=sched-autopref-queue-depth=nnn
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83046
--- Comment #18 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat Dec 30 17:02:00 2017
New Revision: 256045
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256045&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Prune removed funcs from offload table
2017-12-30 Tom de Vries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47307
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83581
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82601
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81962
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69777
--- Comment #4 from Vadim Zeitlin ---
Sorry, I've somehow forgot to provide the example, but here it is in its most
minimal form:
namespace {
struct AnonB {
virtual bool foo() const = 0;
virtual ~AnonB() {}
};
}
struct R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78983
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Using 7.2, I still see an ICE with the reduced example from Comment 3:
You didn't apply Paul's patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-12/msg00099.html, did you? So why are you
surprised that t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83595
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69777
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83609
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
Summary|[8 Regression] IC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83628
Bug ID: 83628
Summary: performance regression when accessing arrays on alpha
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83608
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83609
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83622
--- Comment #4 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
I can see what is happening: During the allocate, we have
check.dim[0].lbound = 1;
check.dim[0].ubound = 4;
check.dim[0].stride = 1;
check.offset = -1;
but no sign of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83622
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83620
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Or, alternatively, does --param=max-sched-ready-insns=0 make sense and is it
supportable? If not, we could just require it to be at least one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83620
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83620
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83622
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83623
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42984
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42984&action=edit
gcc8-pr83623.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83612
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83612
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83623
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83623
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83612
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat Dec 30 10:31:54 2017
New Revision: 256042
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=256042&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix 'memory cannot be printed' in c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c
2017-
48 matches
Mail list logo
