https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81240
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83358
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83358
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Sat Dec 16 04:28:08 2017
New Revision: 255739
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255739&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-15 Markus Trippelsdorf
PR target/83358
* config
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78394
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
-O0 has none of the analysis necessary and I believe you get no warnings at
all.
A minimum of -Og is needed, but -Og is inherently going to give many false
positives.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78394
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> Well, -Og doesn't do any of the detailed analysis and optimization that
> would give the compiler the opportunity to eliminate the paths that result
> in the fal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83437
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81197
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Dec 16 00:40:14 2017
New Revision: 255735
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255735&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-15 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83205
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Dec 16 00:41:10 2017
New Revision: 255736
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255736&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-15 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78394
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 69026, which changed state.
Bug 69026 Summary: dwarf2out.c:4295 warning:
‘finder[...]addr_table_entry_struct_union::label’ may be used uninitialized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69026
What|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69026
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409
--- Comment #29 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Nevermind my last comment. Totally wrong. This is fixed on the trunk,
totally and completely by Aldy's changes.
The trunk changed in that it can thread the jump now because we'll be under
growth limits,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61409
--- Comment #28 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So this is "fixed" on the trunk.
The trunk now has the ability to track statements that will likely become dead
code as a result of jump threading. That's enough to get the provided samples
under the cod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 42145, which changed state.
Bug 42145 Summary: bogus "may be used uninitialized" (a || b converted to a|b)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42145
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42145
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20968
Bug 20968 depends on bug 36550, which changed state.
Bug 36550 Summary: Wrong "may be used uninitialized" warning (conditional PHIs)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36550
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 36550, which changed state.
Bug 36550 Summary: Wrong "may be used uninitialized" warning (conditional PHIs)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36550
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36550
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36550
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:35:51 2017
New Revision: 255731
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255731&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/36550
* tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (coun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83217
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:16:15 2017
New Revision: 255730
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255730&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83217
* decl.c (cp_finish_decomp): If decl's type i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83269
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:15:30 2017
New Revision: 255729
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255729&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83269
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83198
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:14:41 2017
New Revision: 255728
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255728&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-14 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81165
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794
Bug 19794 depends on bug 81165, which changed state.
Bug 81165 Summary: [8 Regression] Regression in GCC-8.0.0's optimizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81165
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79650
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:13:37 2017
New Revision: 255727
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255727&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-14 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80631
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:12:46 2017
New Revision: 255726
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255726&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-12 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81906
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:11:33 2017
New Revision: 255725
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255725&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-08 Joseph Myers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81165
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:11:06 2017
New Revision: 255724
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255724&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/81165
* tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (uses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80259
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:10:40 2017
New Revision: 255723
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255723&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-06 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81212
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:09:50 2017
New Revision: 255722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255722&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-02 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78643
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:09:07 2017
New Revision: 255721
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255721&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-02 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80583
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:09:07 2017
New Revision: 255721
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255721&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-12-02 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80819
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:08:20 2017
New Revision: 255720
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255720&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-11-29 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81888
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:07:23 2017
New Revision: 255719
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255719&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-11-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81675
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:06:16 2017
New Revision: 255718
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255718&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-11-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81553
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:05:00 2017
New Revision: 255717
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255717&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-11-25 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81304
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 22:00:48 2017
New Revision: 255716
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255716&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-11-24 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83014
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 21:58:13 2017
New Revision: 255715
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255715&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-11-24 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81841
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 21:55:47 2017
New Revision: 255712
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255712&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-11-23 Dirk Broemmel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82253
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 21:54:15 2017
New Revision: 255711
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255711&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-11-23 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83084
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 21:53:29 2017
New Revision: 255710
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255710&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-11-22 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82880
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 21:52:06 2017
New Revision: 255709
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255709&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-11-21 James Cowgill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83059
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 21:50:52 2017
New Revision: 255708
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255708&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-11-21 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82781
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 21:50:00 2017
New Revision: 255707
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255707&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-11-20 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81197
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8 Regression] ICE with |[7 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83205
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83205
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 21:40:45 2017
New Revision: 255706
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255706&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83205
* decl.c (cp_finish_decomp): Handle the case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81197
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 21:39:20 2017
New Revision: 255705
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255705&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81197
* cp-tree.h (cp_maybe_mangle_decomp): Declare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83201
--- Comment #6 from Pat Haugen ---
So I did a bisect of trunk during the GCC 7 development timeframe
(r235035-r247017) and it pointed to r236878 as the point where the failure
started.
+++ gcc/ChangeLog (revision 236878)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83437
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83440
Bug ID: 83440
Summary: Internal compiler error: in vect_transform_stmt, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:8692
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83439
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83439
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 15 20:45:36 2017
New Revision: 255704
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255704&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-15 Richard Biener
PR bootstrap/83439
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83330
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80135
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE in |[6/7 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE in |[6/7 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83416
--- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #3)
> gfortran intentionally rejects such code.
I'm not convinced that this is correct.
The following code works with Cray, Intel and NAG in the way I expect it:
pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81922
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 20:20:00 2017
New Revision: 255703
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255703&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80135
PR c++/81922
* typeck2.c (digest_init
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80135
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 20:20:00 2017
New Revision: 255703
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255703&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80135
PR c++/81922
* typeck2.c (digest_init
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83217
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83217
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 19:41:45 2017
New Revision: 255702
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255702&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/83217
* decl.c (cp_finish_decomp): If decl's type i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #33 from costinc at gmail dot com ---
There are legitimate reasons to ignore results, even without additional
comments.
One use case I ran into is:
// ok() checks the same condition as the one returned by f().
while (ok()) {
switc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83439
--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On December 15, 2017 7:58:09 PM GMT+01:00, "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote :
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83439
>
>--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
>Bisected to r255682.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83439
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Bisected to r255682. Guess I'll bootstrap my patchset with this change
reverted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396
--- Comment #81 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #80)
> A preprocessed testcase and command line would be welcome to try to debug
> the armv8 issue.
Sorry for the confusion. The armv8 bootstrap indeed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83439
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83439
Bug ID: 83439
Summary: [7 Regression] Bootstrap failure with
--enable-checking=yes,rtl,extra
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83437
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #5)
> I think the best solution would be to use "V = void (*)(void);"
>
> I quote from Joseph Myers e-mail from 10/10/2017 because I could not
> express it any better
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #32 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Yes, it does hurt. Quite many people use casts to void automatically on
all function calls where they do not use the result. They of course need
to be re-educated on that. Casts to void do not portab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83269
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Target Milestone|8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83437
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
I think the best solution would be to use "V = void (*)(void);"
I quote from Joseph Myers e-mail from 10/10/2017 because I could not
express it any better:
"Sometimes an interface needs to store an arbitra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83437
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83396
--- Comment #80 from Alexandre Oliva ---
A preprocessed testcase and command line would be welcome to try to debug the
armv8 issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80631
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 17:51:36 2017
New Revision: 255701
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255701&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/80631
* gcc.target/i386/avx2-pr80631.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83429
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83429
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Daan,
Works for me here. It could be that the compiler is trying to use a wrong
library version. Did you build gfortran yourself? What system are you running
on?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70268
--- Comment #14 from infinity0 at pwned dot gg ---
> it has a unified option (-ffile-prefix-map) [..]
Oh, nice. That might save me some work, then.
Could you bounce me the thread? Or failing that, tell me the Message-ID of one
of the messages, s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80210
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #22 from Peter Bergne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1)
> I can not check this right. Jerry, van you take a look?
Looking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83437
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #31 from Hans Ecke ---
I would like to point out that what everybody here proposes - make (void) work
properly with WUR - hurts no one. The other viewpoint has only given vague
theoretical reasons. Let me give you something concrete:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83436
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83410
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83410
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Dec 15 16:19:22 2017
New Revision: 255700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83410
* tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (threa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70268
--- Comment #13 from Boris Kolpackov ---
No, I was not aware, thanks for the pointer. I skimmed through it and I agree,
the environment variable is a bad idea. In fact, if you look at the patch that
I've proposed, it has a unified option (-ffile-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70268
infinity0 at pwned dot gg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||infinity0 at pwned dot gg
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59930
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Fri Dec 15 15:04:59 2017
New Revision: 255698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR C++/59930] template friend classes & default args
https://gcc.gnu.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83269
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 14:37:52 2017
New Revision: 255697
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255697&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/83269
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81281
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Dec 15 14:36:26 2017
New Revision: 255696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255696&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/81281
* match.pd ((T)(P + A) - (T)P -> (T) A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81616
--- Comment #40 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Sebastian Peryt from comment #39)
> I have tested it on SKX with SPEC2006INT and SPEC2017INT and don't see any
> regressions.
I should have written that the patch only affects znver1 tuning by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83437
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
I think casting to/from void* (*)() should always be silently accepted.
Or perhaps the warning should not be enabled even for -Wextra like clang's
-Wbad-function-cast. (BTW why didn't you use that name?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83438
Bug ID: 83438
Summary: [8 Regression] 435.gromacs miscompares
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83438
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83437
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83388
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Known to fail|8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83388
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 15 13:43:30 2017
New Revision: 255694
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255694&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-15 Richard Biener
PR lto/83388
* internal-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83437
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82365
--- Comment #11 from Arnd Bergmann ---
More testing reveals that a handful of files in the kernel are affected by this
bug in the BUG() definition on architectures that do not use an inline assembly
statement to trap during an assertion, around h
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo