https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83224
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83235
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83224
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83224
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Dec 1 07:35:50 2017
New Revision: 255294
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255294&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-12-01 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/83224
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81165
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83225
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82106
--- Comment #7 from Jim Wilson ---
I have an initial attempt to fix this in the patch I just added as an
attachment. It needs more work and more testing to be useful, and agreement
from other gcc hackers that this makes sense.
On the original t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82106
--- Comment #6 from Jim Wilson ---
Created attachment 42762
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42762&action=edit
Work in progress patch.
The && 1 are calls to a target hook I haven't written yet, and the && 0 is the
same hook w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82106
--- Comment #5 from Jim Wilson ---
Created attachment 42761
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42761&action=edit
Alternate testcase.
To show how unaligned split argument gets loaded into general register.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83222
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83222
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 30 23:43:10 2017
New Revision: 255285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255285&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/83222
* c-tree.h (decl_constant_value_1): Declare.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83236
Bug ID: 83236
Summary: "Did you mean" suggestions maybe shouldn't offer
implementation-private names
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
jyong at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66205
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||7.1.0, 8.0
--- Comment #9 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83235
Bug ID: 83235
Summary: IAND sometimes doesn't take bitwise-and of sign bit
with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81697
--- Comment #4 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Nov 30 21:38:16 2017
New Revision: 255283
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255283&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2017-11-30 Maxim Ostapenko
PR sanitizer/81
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83234
--- Comment #1 from Ketan ---
I am on Debian 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83234
Bug ID: 83234
Summary: Aggressive loop optim warning for loop iteration that
cannot happen
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79228
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83103
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83112
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83112
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Nov 30 20:52:27 2017
New Revision: 255282
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255282&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-30 Michael Meissner
PR libgcc/83112
* co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83103
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Nov 30 20:52:27 2017
New Revision: 255282
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255282&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-30 Michael Meissner
PR libgcc/83112
* co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #16)
> (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> > > It's better than what we have today, but I'm not sure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #15)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> > It's better than what we have today, but I'm not sure it's where we want to
> > get to in the long term.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83189
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83227
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83224
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83233
Bug ID: 83233
Summary: [8 Regression] gimple-ssa-store-merging.c:183:3:
warning: unnamed type with no linkage used to declare
variable with linkage
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82842
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82717
--- Comment #8 from Jim Wilson ---
Author: wilson
Date: Thu Nov 30 18:38:26 2017
New Revision: 255281
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255281&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Riscv doc fixes and improvements.
gcc/
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> It's better than what we have today, but I'm not sure it's where we want to
> get to in the long term.
>
> I've been trying a patch that allows the system_h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79153
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42758
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42758&action=edit
gcc8-pr79153.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83224
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83232
Bug ID: 83232
Summary: fma3d spec2000 regression on zen with -Ofast (generic
tuning) after r255268 by missed SLP oppurtunity
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's better than what we have today, but I'm not sure it's where we want to get
to in the long term.
I've been trying a patch that allows the system_header pragma to be disabled
when building and testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83231
Bug ID: 83231
Summary: ICE on constexpr evaluation
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83069
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83229
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Nov 30 17:43:08 2017
New Revision: 255279
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255279&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/82219 - bogus -Wignored-qualifiers with template
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83230
Bug ID: 83230
Summary: [8.0 regression] segmentation fault in bind C C/C++
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83179
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65927
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65927
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Nov 30 17:29:08 2017
New Revision: 255278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255278&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/65927 Fix -Wunused-but-set-parameter warning
PR lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82719
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82846
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82258
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82720
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82219
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80700
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69811
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79153
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65927
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83178
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
A general comment from my side here is that RTL really has too many ways to
express vector "combinations" / "shuffles". In particular vec_merge can
be expressed (up to the CONST_INT bitmask limit to 128 vec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83229
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83229
Bug ID: 83229
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in from_gcov_type, at
profile-count.h:676
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83227
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76732
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 42754
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42754&action=edit
patch to add -Weh-mismatch to handle this case
Since the main concern seems to be EH mismatch, how about this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83221
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83217
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Also, please note that in the past, new instructions from ISA n+1 were just
bolted to existing patterns without much thought, under assumption that the new
instructions are always faster than the old ones.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Now, because this is generic tuning we force that into stack.
> Though I must repeat for the nth time that this is very confusing; either
> for some AMD chips (is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83226
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83228
Bug ID: 83228
Summary: Remove optimistic assumptions about atomic ops in
optab.c
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83224
--- Comment #2 from urbanjost at comcast dot net ---
Thanks for checking on this so quickly. I did not reduce my example any further
than I did because it would just print without padding with blanks the way I
expected and not abort if I made it s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83226
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Nov 30 13:45:37 2017
New Revision: 255271
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255271&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83226 avoid forming pointer-to-reference type
PR li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83203
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Broken with r254548.
Self-contained testcase:
typedef long long V __attribute__((vector_size (32)));
V
foo (long long x)
{
return (V) { x };
}
I'll have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83204
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83227
Bug ID: 83227
Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in
process_init_constructor_array
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83222
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42752
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42752&action=edit
gcc8-pr83222.patch
Perhaps we can do something like this and in initializers try to behave more
consistently ev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83222
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, even GCC 7 and older were doing it, but only with -O1 and above.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83226
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82622
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21549
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
The issue of undocumented configure options also came up in bug 82824, although
that was a tangent so I won't add it under "See Also"
(In reply to Benjamin Kosnik from comment #3)
>
> As an aside, are a lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83156
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81470
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Emrich ---
(In reply to Olivier Hainque from comment #11)
> Comment on attachment 42747 [details]
> don't emit .cfi_personality/.cfi_lsda for !dwarf2 eh
>
> >diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c
> >index 3d6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
>
> --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Created attachment 42751
> --> https://gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83225
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, clyon at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
>
> Christophe Lyon changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83226
Bug ID: 83226
Summary: [7 Regression] std::map with reference T breaks in
C++17 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83225
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83043
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #10 from Andrey Guskov ---
Confirmed on Haswell and Silvermont.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42751
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42751&action=edit
gcc8-pr83219.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83210
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83213
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83225
Bug ID: 83225
Summary: [8.0 regression] runtime error in transfer.c
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83210
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 30 10:29:58 2017
New Revision: 255269
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255269&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/83210
* internal-fn.c (expand_mul_overflow): Opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> On November 29, 2017 4:35:12 PM GMT+01:00, "thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org"
> wrote:
> >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83216
> >
> >--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> For the -fsanitize=unreachable, maybe just g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83224
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Because new __builtin_unreachable calls are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83219
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For the -fsanitize=unreachable, maybe just gimple_seq_unreachable_p shouldn't
return true ever if sanitize_flags_p (SANITIZE_UNREACHABLE).
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
