https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83037
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
This issue will get fixed by:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg01580.html
I will close this bug once the patch lands in trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83037
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83034
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70932
--- Comment #10 from Paul Wankadia ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #9)
> Sorry, I haven't gotten to it yet.
Was this bug fixed in GCC 7.x? :)
I ask because the workaround in RE2 is conditioned thus:
#if !defined(__clang__) && define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83038
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035
pouar at pouar dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pouar at pouar dot net
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83038
Bug ID: 83038
Summary: [8 regression] warning at random points in the input
(array subscript -1 is below array bounds)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83037
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83024
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82953
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82936
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82930
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #14 from Tero Koskinen ---
Created attachment 42640
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42640&action=edit
ahven sources + modified simple_test
I added a way to reproduce the problem.
Extract all files, check Makefil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #13 from Victor Porton ---
It is a GCC bug rather than an Ahven bug, because the bug is triggered by `with
Ada.Text_IO;` (and disappears if we remove this line from spawn-signals.adb)
which should not influence semantics of the progra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81356
--- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey ---
Author: sje
Date: Fri Nov 17 22:44:32 2017
New Revision: 254901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-17 Steve Ellcey
PR target/81356
* config/aarch64/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69493
--- Comment #7 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #6)
> When compiling for POWER9, we get the code we want/expect:
FYI, we also get optimal code (ie, just a blr) when compiling on POWER8 BE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
Tero Koskinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tero.koskinen at iki dot fi
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79845
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83037
Bug ID: 83037
Summary: ice in to_sreal_scale, at profile-count.c:275
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83032
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
I don't think that's one of the cases where the C++ standard allows elision,
and I am not sure how that would work in practice. The idea for the return slot
optimization is that the caller reserves enough memor
werpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../../src/gcc/configure
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --with-cpu=power7
--with-long-double-128 --prefix=/home/willschm/gcc/install/gcc/
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44292
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83036
Bug ID: 83036
Summary: INQUIRE specifier NEXTREC is a 4-byte integer, should
be 8
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44292
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82366
spamdrop at fodvo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.1.0 |7.2.0
--- Comment #6 from spa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83035
Bug ID: 83035
Summary: Using decltype fails with an operator using non-ADL
lookup
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82814
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 42638
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42638&action=edit
Fix for the bug
This fixes the bug. However, I will wait until PR78990 is out of the way before
submitting
Cheer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82923
--- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 42637
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42637&action=edit
Fix for the bug
This one does the job and it regtests OK. However, I'll wait until I get
PR78990 out of the way b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83034
Bug ID: 83034
Summary: ice in mem_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.c :15669
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #11 from Victor Porton ---
Debian libahven27 package version 2.6-1.2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83021
Adrian Bunk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bunk at stusta dot de
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #10 from Victor Porton ---
I notified the Ahven author.
However, the bug is quite weird: Isn't linking with a library just no-op if no
functions from the library are called? I wonder how the bug may depend on
linking with it. So I fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66689
--- Comment #6 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
Created attachment 42635
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42635&action=edit
Patch with regenerated testcases for all. tr1 and std.
2017-11-17 Edward Smith-R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83033
Bug ID: 83033
Summary: aarch64/cortex-a57-fma-steering.c: 3 * poor C++ style
?
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #9 from simon at pushface dot org ---
Seems to me your problem is with the Ahven library rather than with GCC, so the
person to investigate it should be the Ahven maintainer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83021
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60068
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||8.0
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66735
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82641
--- Comment #10 from Tamar Christina ---
Author: tnfchris
Date: Fri Nov 17 15:53:51 2017
New Revision: 254878
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254878&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-17 Tamar Christina
PR target/82641
* con
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81117
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83032
Bug ID: 83032
Summary: Copy elision for returning subobject
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #8 from Victor Porton ---
Created attachment 42634
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42634&action=edit
Sources in gnatchop format
Run
gnatchop all.chop to extract the sources.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #7 from Victor Porton ---
There is an easier way to reprise the bug:
Copy all source files into a directory and run:
gnatmake simple_test -largs -lahven
./simple_test
To reprise the bug, you need Ahven installed.
I will attach sou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82621
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Fixed on trunk, backports pending.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #6 from Victor Porton ---
I found that the presence of the bug depends on presense `-lahven` in the
linker command.
Adding -lahven leads to the bug, removing it removes the bug.
Weird?
name;habib amini
address;iran--isfahan state-tiran city-two region-tir street-pelak 30
city;tiran
country;iran
state;isfahan
email;ramyn...@gmail.com
zip code;85319-35351
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #5 from Victor Porton ---
Created attachment 42633
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42633&action=edit
The source reprising the bug without "ainet"
Needs "ahven" to reprise the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #4 from Victor Porton ---
If I remove `with "ahven";` from spawn_tests.gpr the bug disappears.
Seems to do something with elaboration order.
I also deleted `with "anet";` from spawn_common.gpr without any effect on the
bug.
I will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82621
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Nov 17 14:46:04 2017
New Revision: 254874
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254874&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
combine: Don't split insns if half is unused (PR82621)
If we have a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
--- Comment #3 from Victor Porton ---
GCC 7.2.0, Debian Linux 4.13.0.
Eric Botcazou: I can't make a standalone reproducer without project file,
because the bug appears only when I compile in two stages: creating an .a
library and then linking wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83020
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71212
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81117
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83025
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83025
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Nov 17 14:07:58 2017
New Revision: 254871
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254871&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/83025 fix constraints for path overloads in
PR lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 17 13:36:37 2017
New Revision: 254869
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254869&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-17 Richard Biener
PR fortran/83017
* tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82627
Andrey Guskov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Nov 17 13:15:34 2017
New Revision: 254867
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254867&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-11-17 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/83017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83022
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #2)
> I noticed the crazy default probabilities during investigating this. I
> think that's really a second-order problem.
It's just that comparing the frequencies (or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80479
jseward at acm dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jseward at acm dot org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60243
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener ---
So, add a comment in the asm to make the testcase test the same as originally
for this PR (seems to peak at ~2GB then).
Execution times (seconds)
phase setup : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60243
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||memory-hog
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83022
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49526
Matthijs van Duin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthijsvanduin at gmail dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83029
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71192
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83025
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83023
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83021
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82963
Arnd Bergmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arnd at linaro dot org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
failed loop-distribution hack: (still needs dependence analysis fixes)
Could even preserve TBAA if we use a {} of correct element array type.
For constant sizes this should be always a win.
Index: gcc/tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83031
Bug ID: 83031
Summary: Tail call optimization not used in cases when first
part of the result is returned from function
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Sth like the following which only works up to the point of dependence analysis
trying to disambiguate this ref against others ... I suppose some
dr_may_alias_p tweaks to consider niter information and step/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82604
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
So it still parallelizes the loop(s) but at one level deeper (line 176 vs.
173).
This is because dependence analysis does not handle calls and loop distribution
distributed a memset. ISL dependence analysis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70268
--- Comment #9 from Boris Kolpackov ---
I've proposed a different implementation (and a bit different options names)
here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg01451.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so the correctness issue is that 'tmp' is treated as shared by autopar.
Clearly while the outer loop iterations are independent the dependence in the
inner loop should make autopar privatize this array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82621
--- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Lack of coffee: the CA feeding into insn 90 is from insn 89, not from 77.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82621
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Trying 77 -> 90:
77: {r196:SI=0-r188:SI;ca:SI=leu(r188:SI,0);}
REG_UNUSED ca:SI
90: {r197:SI=r196:SI+r196:SI+ca:SI;clobber ca:SI;}
REG_DEAD r196:SI
REG_DEAD ca:SI
REG_UNUSED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83030
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83030
Bug ID: 83030
Summary: [8 regression] ICE in create_pseudo_cfg, at
dwarf2cfi.c:2840
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82621
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82767
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Peryt ---
Created attachment 42632
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42632&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix PR.
Better patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83017
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so we do slightly better for the runtime test than for the static test:
if (loop->inner)
m_p_thread=2;
else
m_p_thread=MIN_PER_THREAD;
so with 2 threads we should have exac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82907
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82946
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82946
>
> --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82908
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82940
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
In combine, we start with
insn_cost 4 for10: r137:SI=r136:QI#0&0x7f
REG_DEAD r136:QI
insn_cost 4 for13: r140:SI=r132:SI&0xff80
REG_DEAD r132:SI
insn_cost 4 for16: r1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83029
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Longva
---
Created attachment 42631
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42631&action=edit
Attachments as described in the bug report
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83029
Bug ID: 83029
Summary: Memory leaks due to leaked thread local variable
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82940
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc |powerpc*-*-*
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82982
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82901
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at pushface dot org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83027
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
95 matches
Mail list logo