https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81803
--- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 7 07:44:58 2017
New Revision: 254488
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254488&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/81803
* lra-constraints.c (curr_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82872
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82875
--- Comment #2 from Qirun Zhang ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #1)
> This is likely a duplicate of PR82816.
Hi Arseny, I tried it on r254484. It still exists.
$ gcc-trunk -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-trunk
COLLECT_LTO_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82875
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878
--- Comment #1 from Kyle Sunden ---
Created attachment 42554
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42554&action=edit
Preprocessed source file
Needed to compress because the plain text is too large to submit.
Did not realize it di
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82878
Bug ID: 82878
Summary: ICE in assign_temp, at function.c:968 when using
optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82874
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82877
Bug ID: 82877
Summary: negative array index accepted in a pointer difference
expression in constexpr context
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82876
Bug ID: 82876
Summary: out-of-bounds pointer offset silently accepted in
constexpr context
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20171106 (experimental) [trunk revision 254453] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -Os abc.c
during RTL pass: expand
abc.c: In function ‘fn1’:
abc.c:15:25: internal compiler error: in find_widening_optab_handler_and_mode,
at optabs-query.c:414
d ? (a %= c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82873
--- Comment #1 from Matthew Fernandez ---
Sorry, that was meant to be PR 14779, not 14799.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82874
Bug ID: 82874
Summary: invalid array index accepted in constexpr context
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I would be OK with a hard error. If so, we need to think about any other
similir situations with other modern fortran features. Then we get into a game
of chasing more rabits. Perhaps best to document and jus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82873
Bug ID: 82873
Summary: Generated copy constructor calls constructors for
0-sized array members
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82872
Bug ID: 82872
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] ICE in ignore_overflows on an
out-of-bounds index in constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82871
Bug ID: 82871
Summary: Unneeded lsls lsrs instructions generated on half
word access for arm cortex-m4 target.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82869
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 11:40:52PM +, james.s.spencer at gmail dot com
wrote:
>
> The third example occurs without the sanitizer enabled.
>
Grouping multiple bug reports into one is probably not
a good i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82869
--- Comment #2 from james.s.spencer at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> (In reply to james.s.spencer from comment #0)
> > I think if a pointer, p, is C_NULL_PTR then c_associated(p) should always
> > return false. However, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82870
Bug ID: 82870
Summary: Assignment by Designated Initializer Overwrites a
Flexible Array Member
Product: gcc
Version: 6.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82869
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82869
Bug ID: 82869
Summary: c_associated does not always give false for null
pointers
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82788
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82856
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugzilla.suse.com/s |
|how_bug.cgi?id=10665
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82856
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
FWITW, the patch to automake
--- automake-1.11.orig 2017-11-06 21:47:27.451349052 +0100
+++ automake2017-11-06 21:48:29.882102274 +0100
@@ -4156,7 +4156,7 @@
sub substitute_ac_subst_variables ($)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82856
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Likely all active branches are affected and it's likely not a regression.
>
> Can you quickly figure what automake version fixed this?
Unfortunately not. Tryin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82866
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 07:48:12PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
> (In reply to kargl from comment #4)
> --- snip ---
>
> If it passes regression testin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82866
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82816
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82868
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82866
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82866
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82848
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||willschm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82748
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Nov 6 18:31:48 2017
New Revision: 254462
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254462&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-11-06 Michael Meissner
PR target/82748
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82868
Bug ID: 82868
Summary: ICE in generate_coarray_sym_init, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:5203
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82867
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82867
Bug ID: 82867
Summary: missing warning on buffer overflow assigning to the
result of mempcpy
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82866
--- Comment #2 from G. Steinmetz ---
Slightly different :
$ cat z7.f90
module m
type t(a, :, *)
end type
end
$ cat z7s.f90
subroutine s
type t(a, :, *)
end type
end
$ cat z8.f90
module m
type t(*, a, :)
end type
end
$ c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82866
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||82173
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82866
Bug ID: 82866
Summary: [PDT] ICE in resolve_fl_derived0, at
fortran/resolve.c:14004
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 65579, which changed state.
Bug 65579 Summary: [C++11] gcc requires definition of a static constexpr member
even though it is not odr-used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65579
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65579
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65579
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Nov 6 17:45:55 2017
New Revision: 254461
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254461&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2017-11-06 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/65579
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865
Bug ID: 82865
Summary: Option -fdec collides with PDT
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56496
--- Comment #3 from G. Steinmetz ---
Further reduced :
$ cat z1.f90
program p
class(*), allocatable :: a[:]
allocate (integer :: a[*])
select type (a)
type is (integer)
end select
end
$ gfortran-8-20171105 -c z1.f90 -fcoarray=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56496
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #2 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82850
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82864
Bug ID: 82864
Summary: Stop using GOMP_OFFLOAD_openacc_async_set_async
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82846
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Works for me; I wasn't able to reproduce.
Does the fix for PR jit/82826 (r254458) help?
If I add this to set_options in harness.h:
gcc_jit_context_set_bool_option (
ctxt,
GCC_JIT_BOOL_OPTION_DUMP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82859
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82850
Erik Cass changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.4.0 |6.4.0
--- Comment #3 from Erik Cass ---
Hel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82826
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82826
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Should be fixed by r254458.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82861
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Should already have been fixed by r254277.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82826
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Nov 6 16:31:04 2017
New Revision: 254458
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254458&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
ipa-fnsummary.c: fix use-after-free crash (PR jit/82826)
gcc/ChangeLog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82838
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82838
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 6 16:29:11 2017
New Revision: 254457
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254457&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/82838
* gimple-ssa-store-merging.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82863
Bug ID: 82863
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE in verify_flow_info building SH
libgcc
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82844
--- Comment #8 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> That is r253366. X32 failed to build between r253136 and r253365.
Ok, thanks! We still have patches in the pipeline in this area (s-taprop*
files), so I’ll try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82850
Erik Cass changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.5 |5.4.0
--- Comment #2 from Erik Cass ---
Hi!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82788
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Nov 6 15:51:16 2017
New Revision: 254456
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254456&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82788
* config/i386/i386.c (PROBE_INTERVAL): Remo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82862
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
[...]
> Really? It doesn't show up in the ./configure --help output:
>
> Local-Admins-MacBook-Pro:gcc ericgallager$ ./configure --help=recursive |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2)
> > --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
> [...]
> > Apparently 10.6/Darwin 11 isn't supported either; see bug 82829. As I said
>
> I couldn't fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82862
Bug ID: 82862
Summary: [8 Regression] SPEC CPU2006 465.tonto performance
regression with trunk@253975 (up to 40% drop for
particular loop)
Product: gcc
Version: u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82853
--- Comment #12 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #11)
> (In reply to Wilco from comment #9)
> > It works for any C where (divisor*C) MOD 2^32 == 1 (or -1).
>
> For x%3==0, i.e. z==0 for x==3*y+z with 0<=y<5556 and 0<=z<3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82832
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809
--- Comment #20 from Qing Zhao ---
design doc is at:
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc@gcc.gnu.org/msg83822.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82831
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
This seems previously latent bug in bb-reorder. It produces order of blocks
which
has hot blocks, then some cold blocks and then hot blocks again.
I am not sure why this happens though.
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82816
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Nov 6 14:47:43 2017
New Revision: 254454
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254454&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR82816: Widening multiplies of bitfields
In this PR we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82861
Bug ID: 82861
Summary: 'long double sqrtf128(long double)' conflicts with
built-in declaration 'long double sqrtf128(long
double)' [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82824
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager ---
[...]
> Apparently 10.6/Darwin 11 isn't supported either; see bug 82829. As I said
I couldn't find an explicit statement of support (or non-suppo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38935
Paweł Zacharek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||subc2 at wp dot pl
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82844
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #6)
> > The last good subversion checkin is r253135.
>
> And the first revision for which you have the timeouts?
That is r253366. X32 failed to build between r253136 and r2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82860
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82860
Bug ID: 82860
Summary: [8 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr79347.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82832
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Nov 6 13:45:41 2017
New Revision: 254452
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=254452&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/82832
* ipa-inline-transform.c (update_noncl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82002
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82002
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrey.y.guskov at intel dot
com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82827
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82783
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82858
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Actually, -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic generates expected code:
movl8(%esp), %eax
addl4(%esp), %eax
sbbl%edx, %edx
orl %edx, %eax
ret
-march=i386 doe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82853
--- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Wilco from comment #9)
> It works for any C where (divisor*C) MOD 2^32 == 1 (or -1).
For x%3==0, i.e. z==0 for x==3*y+z with 0<=y<5556 and 0<=z<3.
Indeed, x*0xaaab==y+z*0xaaab is in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82855
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42550
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42550&action=edit
gcc8-pr82855-1.patch
Untested patch, part 3. With these 3, I get for the second function
with -O2 -mavx512{vl,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82855
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 42549
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42549&action=edit
gcc8-pr82855-2.patch
Untested patch, part 2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82855
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82856
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82853
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Might be even more special-cased with x % 3 == 0 ? C1 : C2 aka in if-conversion
context.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82858
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
unsigned c;
unsigned d = __builtin_add_overflow(a, b, &c)?-1:0;
return c|d;
gives the expected asm. Ideally phiopt would recognize a saturing add pattern,
but we have nothing to model it in gimple.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82852
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82851
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82846
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82848
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 |8.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82837
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 |8.0
Target Milestone|---
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
