https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82323
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82337
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82336
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82334
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82337
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82337
--- Comment #2 from Ivo Raisr ---
Created attachment 42241
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42241&action=edit
reduced-3.c (slightly reformatted source to make it more readable)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82337
Ivo Raisr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivo.raisr at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82337
Bug ID: 82337
Summary: -O2: ICE: SSA corruption at tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1010
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82336
Bug ID: 82336
Summary: GCC requires but does not emit defaulted constructors
in certain cases
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59552
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59552
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82324
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80912
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59552
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55791
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60337
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57021
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery
Status|UNCONF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55361
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55767
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55254
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82335
Bug ID: 82335
Summary: Incorrect _Pragma expansion with in complex macro
expressions
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31377
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51066
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44854
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81509
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P5 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68924
--- Comment #1 from Peter Cordes ---
There's __m128i _mm_loadl_epi64 (__m128i const*
mem_addr)(https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#text=movq&expand=5450,4247,3115&techs=SSE2),
which gcc makes available in 32-bit mode.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82334
Bug ID: 82334
Summary: improve list of candidates for a member definition
that doesn't match declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44263
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58225
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
For test I have checked
1 format(i5)
print'()j'
end
I get
000f m t . f 9 0 : 2 : 1 6 : nl nl sp
020p r i n t ' ( ) j ' nl sp sp sp s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82318
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I think the glibc reasoning is: libm functions do not need to behave as if
written in standard C, so in particular F.6 does not apply to them and
they may return values with excess precisio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46224
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82333
Bug ID: 82333
Summary: [8 Regression] powerpc64le _Float128 ICE in as_a, at
machmode.h:345
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47342
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44515
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66756
--- Comment #8 from Melven.Roehrig-Zoellner at DLR dot de ---
Could this still be fixed / filtered out in the ThreadSanitizer somehow?
Otherwise the problem persists that you get huge amounts of false positives
with gfortran.
(I'm sorry, but I d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46224
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58225
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
--- Comment #13 from Krister Walfridsson ---
Author: kristerw
Date: Tue Sep 26 21:26:21 2017
New Revision: 253216
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-26 Krister Walfridsson
PR target/39570
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82332
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82331
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58225
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> So, this is fixed.
Are you sure? I get
print'()j'
1
Warning: Extraneous characters in format at (1)
with 7.2 and a clean trunk.
IMO the marker should point to j.
Hi,
Hope my email finds you fine.
Would you be interested in acquiring an email list of Running Enthusiasts from
USA.
Our Databases:- 1. Tennis Enthusiasts 2. Sports Enthusiasts 3. Soccer
Enthusiasts 4. Hiking Enthusiasts 5. Boxing Enthusiasts 6. Hockey Enthusiasts
7. Golfers List 8. Basket
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58225
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58225
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82324
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Sep 26 20:28:00 2017
New Revision: 253214
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253214&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-26 Janus Weil
PR fortran/82143
PR fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82143
--- Comment #25 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Sep 26 20:28:00 2017
New Revision: 253214
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253214&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-26 Janus Weil
PR fortran/82143
PR f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66756
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82332
Bug ID: 82332
Summary: [8 regression] r253156 breaks test case
gfortran.dg/predcom-1.f
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82331
Bug ID: 82331
Summary: ICE specializing template for function pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82172
--- Comment #17 from Martin Liška ---
So another observation, it's not related to STB_GNU_UNIQUE.
Using --disable-gnu-unique-object:
$ readelf -s /home/marxin/bin/gcc3/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 --wide | grep storage
1431: 0038dd6032 OBJ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82327
--- Comment #2 from Gianfranco ---
I did add some info on the duplicate bug, I reduced the regression in a bunch
of commits (and a two days range).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82327
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.3
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82330
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82327
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82330
Bug ID: 82330
Summary: [7 regression since some days] GCC ICE on i386
building llvm-toolchain-3.8
/<>/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombin
eAddSub.cpp:518:8: inter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82329
Bug ID: 82329
Summary: #pragma GCC target/optimize incurs high compilation
time cost
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-time-hog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82267
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #6)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> > > Are there still cases where -maddress-mode=long makes worse code?
> >
> >
> > Yes, there are more places where -maddres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82267
--- Comment #6 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> > Are there still cases where -maddress-mode=long makes worse code?
>
>
> Yes, there are more places where -maddress-mode=long needs to zero-extend
> address to 64 bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82286
--- Comment #4 from Herman ten Brugge ---
Created attachment 42238
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42238&action=edit
modified test case
I modified the testcase a little bit and did some debugging.
The code outputs a failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82324
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I tried that on powerpc64 and it now longer fails:
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of unsupported tests 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82323
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Martin, if you have free cycles please go ahead.
I think other attributes might suffer from the same problem (alias and
weakref). It doesn't look to me like it can be reliably detected in the
attribute handl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #16 from Tamar Christina ---
Thanks Martin!, I'll follow the other ticket.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82158
Peter Cordes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX
--- Comment #11 from Peter Cordes
) {
unsigned long long rand;
while(!_rdrand64_step(&rand)); // FIXME: limited retry in case RNG is
broken
return rand;
}
// https://godbolt.org/g/x7mUvj
gcc 8.0.0 20170926 -O3 -mrdrnd
movl$1, %edx
.L4:
rdrand %rax
movq%rax, -8(%rsp) # spill to me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
--- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor ---
Yes, the recent changes to the C++ tests are wrong. The failures are being
tracked under bug 82301. I have a patch out for review to fix both the tests
and the implementation of the warning to resolve the p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82159
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82327
Bug ID: 82327
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in equal_mem_array_ref_p, at
tree-ssa-scopedtables.c:429 (i686-linux-gnu)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82267
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 26 13:59:18 2017
New Revision: 253202
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253202&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/82267
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_operand_a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35691
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 26 13:58:11 2017
New Revision: 253201
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253201&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/35691
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (update_range_tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82326
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Gcc extension for vectors is just reinterpret_cast as I thought was documented
too. C cast gets turned into reinterpret_cast. Any other cast does not make
sense really because the bits are being reinterpret
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82326
Bug ID: 82326
Summary: static_cast for vector extension not working?
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80266
--- Comment #5 from Qing Zhao ---
Okay, will let you know when the patch is put into upstream.
Qing
> On Sep 26, 2017, at 5:56 AM, wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
> wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80266
>
> --- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81481
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82321
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 26 11:05:42 2017
New Revision: 253199
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253199&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-26 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/82321
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82143
--- Comment #24 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
All the failures will hopefully be fixed by the patch at ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-09/msg00111.html
... which I plan to commit soon (feedback welcome).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80266
--- Comment #4 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Qing Zhao from comment #3)
> This is a very similar bug as PR80295.
> I have had a fix for 80295 already. hopefully that fix should fix this bug
> too.
>
> since I cannot build gnat on the available mac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82143
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82145
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81854
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82192
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82292
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82244
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82285
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 26 10:16:40 2017
New Revision: 253190
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253190&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82264
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 26 10:16:40 2017
New Revision: 253190
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253190&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82291
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 26 10:16:40 2017
New Revision: 253190
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253190&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82276
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 26 10:16:40 2017
New Revision: 253190
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253190&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82244
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 26 10:16:40 2017
New Revision: 253190
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253190&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82172
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82316
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jordi Vilar from comment #4)
> I don't claim that a extern "C" declarations have to be interpreted as C in
> a C++ translation unit. What I say is that most C libraries (libtiff, zlib,
> lcms,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82307
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The bug status was changed to NEW, that means it's been confirmed as a GCC bug
that should be fixed.
Richard was noting for other people's benefit that Clang accepts the code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #6)
> > > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> > > > (In reply to Iain San
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82175
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82175
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Tue Sep 26 09:33:49 2017
New Revision: 253189
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253189&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR82175 - fix -mcpu=native not working correctly.
The new opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81733
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2 |x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.2,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82324
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #2)
> Not on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 which is equally affected: the tests are still
> compiled and fail as before.
I just posted an improved patch at:
https://
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82324
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> Does this fix the problem?
>
> Index: promotion_3.f90
> ===
> --- promotion_3.f90 (revision 253178)
> +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82325
--- Comment #2 from David ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> To unroll the loop completely with gcc, one needs to use --param
> max-completely-peel-times=32 because the loop has more than 16 iterations,
> which is the default limit
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
