https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82149
--- Comment #3 from Yury Gribov ---
Thanks, the inner condition definitely needs to be && instead of ||. Would
anyone mind submitting this? I'm OOO until end of the week...
zero/trunk/root-gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170909 (experimental) [trun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82165
Bug ID: 82165
Summary: Operator overloading doesn't work with enum bit fields
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82164
Bug ID: 82164
Summary: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow while
constructing std::regex
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82156
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Second, the return of __atomic_always_lock_free and
__atomic_is_lock_free are changed to report false for the affected
accesses. This aims at making users aware of the fact that they don't
get fast hardware
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82156
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66032
--- Comment #10 from Chris Johns ---
(In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #9)
> Yes. I believe it is the same bug. Use of GNU sed specifics on a system
> without GNU sed.
>
> I don't know if that changes the resolution.
For this bug that is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66032
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82153
--- Comment #4 from Arjan van de Ven ---
btw gcc has no issue with just generating cvttsd2si
int roundme2(double A)
{
return A * 4.3;
}
generates
20: f2 0f 59 05 00 00 00mulsd 0x0(%rip),%xmm0# 28
27: 00
28: f2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66032
--- Comment #8 from joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot com ---
Yes. I think they are exactly the same.
--joel
On Sep 9, 2017, at 5:50 PM, chrisj at rtems dot org
mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org>> wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=660
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62097
--- Comment #11 from Chris Johns ---
Bug https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66032 has a patch using awk
that lets the build complete without an error.
The problem is still present on FreeBSD and darwin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66032
--- Comment #7 from Chris Johns ---
Is this bug the same as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62097
As that bug states this issue is present on darwin and the patch I posted fixes
the issues on that host.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61414
Erik Rainey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||erik.rainey at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81852
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes. The dg-options directive disables the features, then the dg-error
directives check for the expected #error diagnostics.
This uses DejaGnu to check for the three specific expected results, rather than
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61940
--- Comment #8 from Jan Kratochvil ---
Still valid for: gcc-7.1.1-3.fc26.x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65188
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65132
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.0 |7.1.1
--- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvi
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170909 (experimental) [trunk revision 251923] (GCC)
$
$ gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-7.2.0 -O3 small.c; ./a.out
$
$ gcctk -O3 small.c
during GIMPLE pass: pcom
small.c: In function ‘h’:
small.c:3:6: internal compiler error: in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82162
Bug ID: 82162
Summary: Internal compiler error in Raspbian
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82161
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82161
Bug ID: 82161
Summary: Failure of a complicated initialization expression
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82145
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82149
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81852
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/feat-neg.C
Thanks for your work on that Jonathan! Just out of curiosity: All tests within
feat-neg.C seem counter-intuiti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81852
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Sep 9 14:32:25 2017
New Revision: 251939
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251939&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/81852 define feature-test macro for -fthreadsafe-statics
gcc/c-fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82159
--- Comment #1 from heinzisoft at web dot de ---
Correction: OS is Ubuntu 17.04, not 17.10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71660
--- Comment #14 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #13)
> If you want a struct with non-atomic members to match the layout of a struct
> with atomic members, do something like
>
> struct foo {
> char c;
> ali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82160
Bug ID: 82160
Summary: [8 Regression] Mysterious testsuite failures
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82159
Bug ID: 82159
Summary: ICE: in assign_temp, at function.c:961
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70029
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82157
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81926
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81926
--- Comment #32 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Sep 9 09:43:33 2017
New Revision: 251923
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251923&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/81926
* cp-objcp-common.c (struct debug_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81926
--- Comment #31 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Sep 9 09:42:39 2017
New Revision: 251922
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251922&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/81926
* cp-objcp-common.c (struct debug_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
36 matches
Mail list logo
