https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81805
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|libgomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82000
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Louis Dionne from comment #2)
> > Downloading the one from godbolt, we simplify it to: [...]
>
> I have no idea what this is and how you feed that to GCC, but I'm curious.
That's what -fdump-tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82000
--- Comment #2 from Louis Dionne ---
> The example you wrote in the bug report makes no sense: missing includes, and
> with the includes added it optimizes to return 0.
Sorry, I did not mean the example I pasted here to be a complete reproducti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69696
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2016-02-05 00:00:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81829
--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #3)
> > marxin's patch:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-08/msg01116.html
> >
> > But this patch doesn't work while
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80087
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79398
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79221
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82016
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82016
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
seurer@makalu-lp1:~/gcc/build/gcc-trunk$ svn info $GCC_SRC | grep Revision
Revision: 251389
seurer@makalu-lp1:~/gcc/build/gcc-trunk$ grep float128-type-
gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.log
Executing on host:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82016
--- Comment #3 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
These are still failing as of r251389
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82016
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This affects gcc.target/powerpc/float128-type-2.c similarly although it is only
tested on powerpc64 BE due to an error in the
/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc64-*-linux* && lp64 } } } */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81051
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80935
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82017
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82016
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #0)
> r251260 is the change to wide-int.h but this test case failure is different
> from the others that change caused.
How is it different? They both use complex internally
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80767
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82017
Bug ID: 82017
Summary: missing strlen optimization for chained mempcpy calls
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80767
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82016
Bug ID: 82016
Summary: [8 regression] test case
gcc.target/powerpc/float128-type-1.c fails after
r251260
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80935
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mathias at gaunard dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80642
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80642
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79191
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> When I add an explicit "-m64" to the compile command I get the same results
> as you, though. Also, it'd be nice if there were a warning from -Wconversion
> for t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82015
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79191
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82015
Bug ID: 82015
Summary: PowerPC should check if 2nd argument to
__builtin_unpackv1ti and similar functions is 0 or 1
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82013
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, error-recovery
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79016
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78917
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78998
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82014
Bug ID: 82014
Summary: worse code emitted for a valid memove than for
undefined memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82009
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81770
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Aug 28 18:46:28 2017
New Revision: 251390
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251390&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Janus Weil
PR fortran/81770
* exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82013
Bug ID: 82013
Summary: better error message for missing semicolon in
prototype
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78915
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81926
--- Comment #12 from Dennis Clarke ---
I don't mean to ask what may seem obvious but does it make sense to
add a not required "dummy .text" section? I mean to say, is there a
valid reason why gas would add in a blank ".text" where none is actual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78837
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78760
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77572
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81923
--- Comment #3 from Denis Khalikov ---
Created attachment 42064
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42064&action=edit
temp.S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81923
--- Comment #2 from Denis Khalikov ---
confgiure flags:
configure_flags="--prefix=/usr --without-cvs --without-selinux
--enable-stackguard-randomization --enable-obsolete-rpc
--disable-sanity-checks"
cc1 invocation:
/home/denis/gcc-build-trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82012
Bug ID: 82012
Summary: [8 Regression] libitm build fails for s390x-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72754
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72754
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.1.3, 4.2.2, 4.3.2, 4.6.0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69971
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
Yes, the warning does exist to warn about unsafe calls to the function (I added
it here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg01702.html). This bug
was meant to suggest a way to make the built-in saf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81900
Yui NARUSE changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||naruse at airemix dot jp
--- Comment #10 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81954
Yui NARUSE changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81926
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou ---
[...]
> Rainer, do you test Go in this configuration (system as + ld)?
Sorry for the long delay: I've been mostly away for 6 weeks, only now
cat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72751
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72754
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81994
--- Comment #2 from Felipe Matas ---
Confirmed, fix the reduced example and the octave compilation problem.
Thx.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82011
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82011
Bug ID: 82011
Summary: [8 regression] early lto debug causes dsymutil warning
on Darwin
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #44 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81923
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70380
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70196
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82010
Bug ID: 82010
Summary: Inspecting a function parameter of "vec *&path" from gdb yields nonsense.
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82004
--- Comment #2 from Andrey Guskov ---
Approximately a hundred different variables and function calls, the majority of
which are raised to the second or third power, sometimes fourth or fifth. As
628.pop2_s is mostly written in Fortran 90, all of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82009
Bug ID: 82009
Summary: ICE with block construct
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81968
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 13:14:28 2017
New Revision: 251384
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251384&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
PR lto/81968
* simple-obj
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 13:13:23 2017
New Revision: 251382
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251382&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
PR debug/81993
* dwarf2o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81987
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Sure, I'll try to get to this this week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81065
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80932
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 12:49:55 2017
New Revision: 251381
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251381&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 12:49:55 2017
New Revision: 251381
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251381&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81065
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 12:49:55 2017
New Revision: 251381
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251381&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82008
Bug ID: 82008
Summary: nonnull attribute and multiple inheritance
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> On Mon, 28 Aug 2017, sylvestre at debian dot org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
> >
> > --- Comment #7 from Sylvestre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70621
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80035
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2)
> Replacing trap with exit or ret (or adding it after trap), makes the sigsegv
> go away.
Nvidia suggested a workaround of adding exit after trap for this (PR81069
c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 28 Aug 2017, sylvestre at debian dot org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
>
> --- Comment #7 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
> Not my call but I am using it to build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007
--- Comment #1 from Édouard Canot ---
I omit to say that many lines in the attached source are commented by a double
bang (!!); remove some of them to reveal the bug...
EC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81884
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 12:16:06 2017
New Revision: 251379
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251379&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82007
Bug ID: 82007
Summary: DTIO write format stored in a string leads to severe
errors
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70180
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, documentation
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70075
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #7 from Sylvestre Ledru ---
Not my call but I am using it to build the llvm toolchain on i386.
Without gsplit-dwarf, I cannot link on the platform, it fails on:
/usr/bin/ld.gold: fatal error: ../../../../lib/liblldb-3.9.so.1: mmap: fa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Thanks. I just successfully built LLVM with -gsplit-dwarf.
Maybe it is time to officially deprecate -gsplit-dwarf?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69971
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #6 from José Pekkarinen ---
(In reply to José Pekkarinen from comment #5)
> I reported that to gcc this morning:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
Sorry, wrong tab.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #5 from José Pekkarinen ---
I reported that to gcc this morning:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30811
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2016-02-02 00:00:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82006
Bug ID: 82006
Summary: [8 Regression] ERROR: torture-init:
torture_without_loops is not empty as expected
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81977
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Aug 28 11:42:23 2017
New Revision: 251378
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251378&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-08-28 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/81977
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81977
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Summary|[5/6/7/8 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|WA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81998
Andrew Schepler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81993
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
So we're creating a template value attribute at late finish time from
(gdb) p debug_generic_expr (e->arg)
{.__pfn=isClassMethod, .__delta=0}
as
(symbol_ref/i:DI ("_ZNK14ObjCMethodDecl13isClassMethodEv") [
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81996
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82003
--- Comment #3 from José Pekkarinen ---
Created attachment 42060
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42060&action=edit
preprocesed sources.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80640
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81316
Bug 81316 depends on bug 80640, which changed state.
Bug 80640 Summary: Missing memory side effect with __atomic_thread_fence (2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80640
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82005
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80640
--- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Mon Aug 28 10:58:45 2017
New Revision: 251377
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251377&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
optabs: ensure mem_thread_fence is a compiler barrier
PR t
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo