[Bug sanitizer/81148] UBSAN: two more false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81148 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/81655] [7/8 Regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81588.c fails on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81655 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.2 Summary|[7 Regression] n

[Bug driver/81650] gcc -m32 mishandles -Walloc-size-larger-than=9223372036854775807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81650 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81648] [8 regression] r250759 breaks build on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81648 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/81633] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect floating point result with tree vectoriser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81633 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/81633] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect floating point result with tree vectoriser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81633 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Aug 2 06:38:36 2017 New Revision: 250811 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250811&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-02 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/81633

[Bug tree-optimization/71752] [7 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:229 w/ -O1 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71752 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Aug 2 06:38:36 2017 New Revision: 250811 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250811&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-02 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/81633

[Bug other/80437] large decimal numbers in diagnostics are hard to read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug other/80437] large decimal numbers in diagnostics are hard to read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/56698] "array subscript is above array bounds" triggered on code that doesn't have that problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56698 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/56698] "array subscript is above array bounds" triggered on code that doesn't have that problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56698 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/55808] excessive memory usage from gcc 4.7.2 when compiling mame source code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55808 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/81566] invalid attribute aligned accepted on functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81566 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|attribute aligned with no |invalid attribute aligned

[Bug target/53362] gcc 4.7 generates invalid code with -O3 and -mtune=bdver1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53362 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/53312] crash in materialize_cgraph (invalid free)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53312 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/52322] lto1: internal compiler error: in lto_symtab_register_decl, at lto-symtab.c:148

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52322 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/52811] -O3 flag makes xorg-server-1.11.4 compile fail on amd64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52811 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/57821] 'array is too large' error is missing when sizetype overflows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57821 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/81656] incompatible _Alignas silently accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81656 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- To be clear: that requirement is not a constraint, so no diagnostic is required. Diagnosis may make sense for _Alignas, but I don't think different choices of __attribute__ ((aligned)) sho

[Bug target/81647] inconsistent LTGT behavior at different optimization levels on AArch64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81647 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Indeed, it's purely the *internal* LTGT_EXPR and LTGT RTL for which the semantics are unclear; the semantics of the built-in function are unambiguous (exception only for signaling NaNs).

[Bug tree-optimization/81038] [8 regression] test case g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc fails starting with r248678

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81038 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81641] Assemble failure with named address spaces and -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81641 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Tue Aug 1 22:06:11 2017 New Revision: 250801 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250801&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/81641 * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_print_o

[Bug rtl-optimization/81625] GCC v4.7 ... v8 is bloating code by > 25% compared to v3.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81625 Fredrik Hederstierna changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fredrik.hederstierna@securi

[Bug c++/81605] -Wignored-attributes emitted when decltype(function) used in template for function with __nonnull__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81605 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- In my view, whenever it's meaningful to act on an attribute for a call via a function pointer (e.g. format, format_arg, const, pure, noreturn, ...), the attribute should apply to the type i

[Bug driver/81658] New: gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC produces buggy executable from working .o files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81658 Bug ID: 81658 Summary: gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC produces buggy executable from working .o files Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/57821] 'array is too large' error is missing when sizetype overflows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57821 --- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Previous discussions in this bug suggest it was specific to 32-bit HOST_WIDE_INT. HOST_WIDE_INT is now always 64-bit.

[Bug middle-end/81657] New: [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 Bug ID: 81657 Summary: [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/81657] [8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/20050503-1.c scan-assembler-not call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81657 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81654] Should interrupt attribute be allowed together with naked attribute?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81654 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81654] Should interrupt attribute be allowed together with naked attribute?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81654 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Aug 1 20:25:41 2017 New Revision: 250793 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250793&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 386: Disallow naked attribute with interrupt attribute gcc/

[Bug other/80437] large decimal numbers in diagnostics are hard to read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- If the warning is based of a const, maybe lead with that e.g. in the 2nd place here: bug.c:11:5: warning: 'memset': specified size 18446744073709551611 (aka 0x___fffb, 1<<64 - 5, SOME_CONST) exce

[Bug other/80437] large decimal numbers in diagnostics are hard to read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Maybe could also make creative use of underscores in large hex values to make things easier on the eye e.g.: bug.c:11:5: warning: 'memset': specified size 18446744073709551611 (aka 0x___fffb, 1<<

[Bug other/80437] large decimal numbers in diagnostics are hard to read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Maybe all four (decimal, hex, formula, and constant): bug.c:11:5: warning: 'memset': specified size 18446744073709551611 (aka 0xfffb, 1<<64 - 5, SOME_CONST) exceeds maximum object size 9223372036

[Bug c/81656] New: incompatible _Alignas silently accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81656 Bug ID: 81656 Summary: incompatible _Alignas silently accepted Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug other/80437] large decimal numbers in diagnostics are hard to read

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80437 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/71440] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in instantiate_type, at cp/class.c:8247

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71440 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug other/49284] -fdump-ipa-cgraph leads to ICE in generate_canonical_option, at opts-common.c:303

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49284 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/48256] gcc4.4.5 internal compiler error: in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:1954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48256 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/46861] alpha gcc 4.2 -fPIC visibility hidden => gp-relative relocation against dynamic symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46861 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Target||alphaev5-unknown-linux-gnu S

[Bug target/81654] Should interrupt attribute be allowed together with naked attribute?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81654 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- Short answer to the question in the summary: No. You are out of luck with every function that touches the stack in any kind of automatic way. Patch that makes interrupt and naked attribute mutually exclusive

[Bug tree-optimization/81503] [8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81503 --- Comment #9 from Bill Schmidt --- This is overkill, it has some test case fallout. Will have to look a bit deeper.

[Bug fortran/79312] Empty array in assignment not correctly type-checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79312 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81655] New: [7 Regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81588.c fails on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81655 Bug ID: 81655 Summary: [7 Regression] new test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr81588.c fails on powerpc64 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/79312] Empty array in assignment not correctly type-checked

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79312 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Aug 1 19:09:02 2017 New Revision: 250792 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250792&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-01 Thomas König PR fortran/79312 * intrisic.

[Bug target/81654] New: Should interrupt attribute be allowed together with naked attribute?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81654 Bug ID: 81654 Summary: Should interrupt attribute be allowed together with naked attribute? Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/81653] gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC miscompiles hand-written .s files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 Bruno Haible changed: What|Removed |Added Target||sparc64-linux-gnu --- Comment #2 from Bru

[Bug driver/81653] gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC miscompiles hand-written .s files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 --- Comment #1 from Bruno Haible --- Created attachment 41885 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41885&action=edit Test case program, part 2

[Bug driver/81653] New: gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC miscompiles hand-written .s files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81653 Bug ID: 81653 Summary: gcc configured with --enable-default-pie on SPARC miscompiles hand-written .s files Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug target/42199] A problem with -maltivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42199 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/81503] [8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81503 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- Patch under test that fixes this case: Index: gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c === --- gcc/gimple-ssa-s

[Bug target/81652] New: [meta-bug] -finstrument-control-flow -mcet bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652 Bug ID: 81652 Summary: [meta-bug] -finstrument-control-flow -mcet bugs Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tar

[Bug target/40503] DEC_EVAL_METHOD not match operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40503 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/81646] i386 SSE2 compilation mode which preserves psABI stack alignment without requiring it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81646 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > > You can use -mstackrealign. > > I don't want to realign the stack unconditionally for performance reasons. > I want to pres

[Bug lto/41565] -m32 causes an ICE when the object files were compiled with 64bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41565 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/45435] Automatically generate C interop interface blocks from C code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45435 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Aug 1 17:59:11 2017 New Revision: 250791 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250791&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-01 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/45435 * lang.opt

[Bug bootstrap/81638] [8 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to Recover GOTO predictor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81638 --- Comment #8 from David Edelsohn --- I already tested the equivalent patch. If the preferred solution is a work-around for the false positive, I'll install that.

[Bug target/81646] i386 SSE2 compilation mode which preserves psABI stack alignment without requiring it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81646 --- Comment #5 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > You can use -mstackrealign. I don't want to realign the stack unconditionally for performance reasons. I want to preserve alignment for callback functions, and give

[Bug target/35179] execs crash in shared lib destructor = do_global_dtors_aux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35179 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Target|i386-pc-solaris2.10 |i386-pc-solaris2.10, |

[Bug fortran/81651] New: Enhancement request: have f951 print out fully qualified module file name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81651 Bug ID: 81651 Summary: Enhancement request: have f951 print out fully qualified module file name Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug c/81289] [8 Regression] ICE in libcpp/line-map.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81289 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-linux-gnu*, | |powerpcspe-*-linux-g

[Bug middle-end/70140] Inefficient expansion of __builtin_mempcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70140 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/70140] Inefficient expansion of __builtin_mempcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70140 --- Comment #17 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Aug 1 17:21:29 2017 New Revision: 250789 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250789&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make mempcpy more optimal (PR middle-end/70140). 2017-08-01 Martin Lisk

[Bug c/81141] missing warning using sizeof a/sizeof *a with a zero-length array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81141 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81622] [7/8 Regression] ICE on invalid altivec code with ppc64{,le}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81622 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/81646] i386 SSE2 compilation mode which preserves psABI stack alignment without requiring it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81646 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/40838] gcc shouldn't assume that the stack is aligned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #89 from H.J

[Bug middle-end/70140] Inefficient expansion of __builtin_mempcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70140 --- Comment #16 from Martin Liška --- So I accidentally installed an old version of patch, reverted in r250788.

[Bug c/80872] There is no warning on accidental infinite loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80872 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81622] [7/8 Regression] ICE on invalid altivec code with ppc64{,le}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81622 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Aug 1 16:44:17 2017 New Revision: 250787 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250787&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/81622 * config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c (altivec_resol

[Bug c/81650] New: gcc -m32 mishandles -Walloc-size-larger-than=9223372036854775807

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81650 Bug ID: 81650 Summary: gcc -m32 mishandles -Walloc-size-larger-than=9223372036854775807 Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/80744] Detect Divide By Zero and give a warning in C/C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80744 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81622] [7/8 Regression] ICE on invalid altivec code with ppc64{,le}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81622 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Aug 1 16:34:31 2017 New Revision: 250785 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250785&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/81622 * config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c (altivec_resol

[Bug target/81647] inconsistent LTGT behavior at different optimization levels on AArch64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81647 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- __builtin_islessgreater should never set or raise an "fp" exception. Interesting the vectorized version does ...

[Bug target/81648] [8 regression] r250759 breaks build on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81648 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/81649] New: Instrumentation Options page grammar

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81649 Bug ID: 81649 Summary: Instrumentation Options page grammar Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web

[Bug target/80846] auto-vectorized AVX2 horizontal sum should narrow to 128b right away, to be more efficient for Ryzen and Intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80846 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Aug 1 16:12:31 2017 New Revision: 250784 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250784&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/80846 * config/rs6000/vsx.md (vextract_fp_from_

[Bug middle-end/70140] Inefficient expansion of __builtin_mempcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70140 --- Comment #15 from Martin Liška --- Sorry for the breakage, I'm going to take a look.

[Bug target/81648] New: [8 regression] r250759 breaks build on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81648 Bug ID: 81648 Summary: [8 regression] r250759 breaks build on powerpc64 Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ta

[Bug c/80745] inconsistent warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80745 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/70140] Inefficient expansion of __builtin_mempcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70140 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug target/81646] i386 SSE2 compilation mode which preserves psABI stack alignment without requiring it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81646 --- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > The Linux ABI says the stack should be 16-byte alignment, anything else is a > bug. The GCC manual recommends this (under -mincoming-stack-boundary): This

[Bug tree-optimization/80925] [8 Regression] vect peeling failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925 --- Comment #20 from Steve Ellcey --- Author: sje Date: Tue Aug 1 15:37:22 2017 New Revision: 250783 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250783&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-01 Steve Ellcey PR tree-optimization/80925 * gcc

[Bug c/69981] -f[no]keep-static-consts has no effect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69981 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/78736] enum warnings in GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78736 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/80619] bad fix-it hint for GCC %lu directive with int argument: %wu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80619 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/81626] Need effective target omp_target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81626 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/77331] incorrect range location in -Wformat with a concatenated format literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77331 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/81561] [7 Regression] Segfault in gcov with -a argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81561 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/81591] segmentation fault when using priorities of nested tasks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81591 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- I believe the check that triggers here is just wrong, if we have 2 different queuest, it is very well possible that they will have different tasks with the same priority as the next candidates. And the code

[Bug gcov-profile/81561] [7 Regression] Segfault in gcov with -a argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81561 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Aug 1 14:49:54 2017 New Revision: 250782 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250782&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix segfault in gcov.c (PR gcov-profile/81561). 2017-08-01 Martin Liska

[Bug libgomp/81591] segmentation fault when using priorities of nested tasks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81591 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Slightly adjusted testcase - no headers, no VLAs, etc.: int main () { #define MT 4 int a[MT * MT]; for (int i = 0; i < MT * MT; i++) a[i] = 0; #pragma omp parallel #pragma omp master { for

[Bug gcov-profile/81561] [7 Regression] Segfault in gcov with -a argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81561 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.0 Summary|[7/8 Regression] S

[Bug target/81647] inconsistent LTGT behavior at different optimization levels on AArch64.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81647 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64 |aarch64,x86_64 --- Comment #2

[Bug gcov-profile/81561] [7/8 Regression] Segfault in gcov with -a argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81561 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Aug 1 14:06:13 2017 New Revision: 250780 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250780&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix segfault in gcov.c (PR gcov-profile/81561). 2017-08-01 Martin Liska

[Bug sanitizer/81645] Learn UBSAN to support -fsanitize=builtin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81645 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.0 |8.0 Target Milestone|8.0

[Bug target/81646] i386 SSE2 compilation mode which preserves psABI stack alignment without requiring it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81646 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Yes, I think everything asked for is already present via those options (just no way to configure a different default). Thus either INVALID or WORKSFORME. Pick ;)

[Bug tree-optimization/81633] [7/8 Regression] Incorrect floating point result with tree vectoriser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81633 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Aug 1 13:58:13 2017 New Revision: 250779 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250779&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-01 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/71752

[Bug tree-optimization/71752] [7 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:229 w/ -O1 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71752 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Aug 1 13:58:13 2017 New Revision: 250779 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250779&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-08-01 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/71752

[Bug target/81646] i386 SSE2 compilation mode which preserves psABI stack alignment without requiring it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81646 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/81635] [8 Regression] nvptx SLP test cases regressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81635 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Tue Aug 1 13:52:14 2017 New Revision: 250778 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250778&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Simplify nvptx/slp* test-cases Use signed loop iteration variable in nvtpx

  1   2   >