https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81573
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81573
Bug ID: 81573
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67795
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65656
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32838
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Pfaller ---
On 07/27/2017 02:34 AM, egallager at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32838
>
> Eric Gallager changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64182
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61105
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60949
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61079
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60806
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60615
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60608
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68754
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.4 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|7.0 |7.2
Summary|[7 Regression] [C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81558
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Does LLVM do a runtime alias check here? For foo1 GCC adds a runtime alias
> check
> (BB vectorization cannot version for aliasing).
Yes. LLVM does not seem to be unrolling the inner loop. As y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
--- Comment #7 from Jim Wilson ---
I must have failed to realize that this was a bug I had created when I got the
earlier message.
Looking now, I see that I can still reproduce with mainline, though the problem
is not as obvious with this testca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55748
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54856
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47379
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81571
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48005
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30867
--- Comment #10 from postmas...@aiscientific-com.bounceio.net ---
Created attachment 41841
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41841&action=edit
attachment-54311-1.eml
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30867
--- Comment #9 from postmas...@aiscientific-com.bounceio.net ---
[IMAGE]
There was a problem delivering your email to:
alf.la...@aiscientific.com
-
WHAT HAPPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30867
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47037
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55479
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63869
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44664
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63269
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47379
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38384
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19815
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50824
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49057
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170726 (experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47681
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79793
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81570
Bug ID: 81570
Summary: create_pseudo_cfg assumes that
INCOMING_FRAME_SP_OFFSET is a constant
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79793
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #16)
> The problem is in create_cie_data:
>
> /* On entry, the Canonical Frame Address is at SP. */
> memset (&loc, 0, sizeof (loc));
> loc.reg = dw_stack_pointer_regnum;
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44704
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66437
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34455
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |SUSPENDED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33715
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |SUSPENDED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30652
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45599
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |SUSPENDED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79793
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
The problem is in create_cie_data:
/* On entry, the Canonical Frame Address is at SP. */
memset (&loc, 0, sizeof (loc));
loc.reg = dw_stack_pointer_regnum;
loc.offset = INCOMING_FRAME_SP_OFFSET;
def_cfa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35296
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30867
--- Comment #7 from postmas...@aiscientific-com.bounceio.net ---
[IMAGE]
There was a problem delivering your email to:
alf.la...@aiscientific.com
-
WHAT HAPPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30867
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |SUSPENDED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32838
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81560
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81548
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Well, distclean does rm -rf $(TARGET_SUBDIR); which takes care of a
lot (in the root generated Makefile). Everything else is in gcc/, not
sure where that is deleted; gotools/ has the only .sum/.log ou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81567
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64*-*-* |
Component|other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81567
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53984
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jul 26 22:06:13 2017
New Revision: 250594
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250594&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/53984 fix failing test
PR libstdc++/53984
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79793
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41834|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81548
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81548
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Jul 26 22:01:36 2017
New Revision: 250593
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250593&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/81548
* Makefile.am (MOSTLYCLEANFILES): Add *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71570
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jul 26 21:46:22 2017
New Revision: 250591
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250591&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2017-07-26 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/71570
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71570
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 regression] ICE on |[6/7 regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81548
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
That's a very good question. I don't know; I tried to fix it but gave up.
All I know is gotools/ is the only did not removed by distclean, because
the two .sent files are left.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81569
Bug ID: 81569
Summary: gcc.guality tests fail with -flto option
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81548
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
You are saying that the files gotools.log.sent and gotools.sum.sent should be
removed by "make distclean" (or some clean target) in gotools/Makefile.am?
I couldn't find any other clean targets in the GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81568
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic, wrong-code
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81568
Bug ID: 81568
Summary: attribute always_inline honored even after attribute
noinline
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81567
Bug ID: 81567
Summary: New test case 27_io/basic_fstream/53984.cc fails on
powerpc64
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80180
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81566
Bug ID: 81566
Summary: attribute aligned with no argument accepted on
functions
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81563
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81563
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 19:13:23 2017
New Revision: 250587
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250587&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
x86: Properly check saved register CFA offset
X86 prologue saves r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81563
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.santos at pobox dot com
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81563
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45784
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54162
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81565
Bug ID: 81565
Summary: confusion between function and type attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54162
--- Comment #5 from Josh Triplett ---
Visual C (2017 at least), clang, and as far as I can tell, current GCC.
I don't know at what point this started working, but it seems to work now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55096
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54787
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67054
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jul 26 17:39:26 2017
New Revision: 250583
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250583&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67054 - Inherited ctor with non-default-constructible membe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54433
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54162
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80724
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43673
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81564
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81564
Bug ID: 81564
Summary: ICE in group_case_labels_stmt()
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51971
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
CC|
1, .-fn1
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 8.0.0 20170726 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-6 xxx]$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81562
Bug ID: 81562
Summary: GDB cannot display long double register variable
values
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44209
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||meta-bug
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79542
--- Comment #7 from Pierre-Marie de Rodat ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #6)
> It looks like the release of 7.2 is upcoming. It would be really great if
> this ICE/Regression is addressed for that release. Is there any way to
> raise
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79542
--- Comment #6 from John Marino ---
It looks like the release of 7.2 is upcoming. It would be really great if this
ICE/Regression is addressed for that release. Is there any way to raise the
visibility on this issue to avoid missing a fix for 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79854
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78449
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67353
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79883
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 14:58:42 2017
New Revision: 250577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250577&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2016-06-15 trunk r237486.
Backport fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67353
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 14:58:42 2017
New Revision: 250577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250577&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2016-06-15 trunk r237486.
Backport fro
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo