https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38497
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> now what is left is hoisting *a_2(D) to after the call. But that's not PRE.
Yes I agree with this but hoisting was added to PRE and we still don't optimize
it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80617
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> C testcase:
I have seen that testcase before in a bug report but I can't find the bug
report :(.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80726
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68467
--- Comment #17 from angelo ---
Hi Carlos,
maybe you can try one of these 2 toolchains i prepared years ago:
http://sysam.it/toolchains.html
Regads,
Angelo
On 25/06/2017 20:40, csotoalonso at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68467
Carlos Soto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||csotoalonso at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81201
--- Comment #2 from arget at autistici dot org ---
Well... this is embarrasing, ok... XD
I though the problem was in the ebx, because returning from chacha(), ebx =
0... but now I looked carefully the chacha() asm code and there isn't any
operatio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81201
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81202
Bug ID: 81202
Summary: Concept parsing error for default template arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81201
Bug ID: 81201
Summary: The final asm code doesn't check if a function changes
the value of ebx, resulting in segmentation fault.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81199
--- Comment #2 from coypu ---
To relay a comment on the netbsd bug,
"I don't think (the proposed idea) is correct and the real problem is that we
are linking libgcc first (again)."
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81200
Bug ID: 81200
Summary: regex classatomcollatingelement
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #7)
> I have reproduced the same problem from the gcc-7 branch.
I fully expect this bug to be in all active branches
of gfortran. We should commit a fix to all of them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79483
--- Comment #14 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> Fixed on trunk sofar.
Odd. Looks broken to me in 20170622. Did the patch go in ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80775
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80763
--- Comment #7 from David Binderman ---
Still seems to be broken, over a month later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|ebotcazou at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
Daniel Santos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41605|0 |1
is obsolete|
20 matches
Mail list logo
