https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81199
--- Comment #1 from coypu ---
Maybe expose __clz_tab but only in the fallback definition case, and not make
it hidden.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81199
Bug ID: 81199
Summary: fallback definition of count_leading_zeros references
hidden symbol
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.0 |7.1.1
--- Comment #7 from Jim Wilson ---
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
--- Comment #53 from Daniel Santos ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #52)
> Unfortunately, the patch doesn't work, apart from the
>
> +# define PCREL "@GETPCREL"
>
> -> @GOTPCREL typo ;-)
Ah hah! That would explain wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81160
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on trunk. Any need to backport to 7 or earlier?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81160
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jun 24 21:22:08 2017
New Revision: 249627
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249627&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-24 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/81160
* arith.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195
--- Comment #6 from Jim Wilson ---
I should point out that there are currently four places that use
newunit_stack/newunit_tos without locking. Two of these places required
locking code to get wrf working.
The other two are init_units and close_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235
--- Comment #11 from Victor Porton ---
The bug was NOT fixed in GCC 7.1.0.
This is a long standing bug :-(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62315
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62315
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Jun 24 19:31:24 2017
New Revision: 249626
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249626&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2017-06-24 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/62315
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81182
Marcin Grzebieluch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grzebieluch at me dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81198
Bug ID: 81198
Summary: [concepts] Same type constraints not enforced for
constrained-type-specifiers specified in trailing
return types of abbreviated functions
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81182
--- Comment #7 from bartek 'basz' szurgot ---
maybe it's more related to a particular set of configuration parameters /
features enabled, then the released version?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #2)
> I was sort of waiting for the new SPEC suite to expose bugs :-)
>
> The patch looks obvious enough, even in the absence
> of a test case.
>
> Could you run a re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81182
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There's something strange about the Debian package then.
$ cat np.cc
struct S
{
int i;
};
template
struct T
{
auto operator->() { return &s; }
S s;
};
template
void problem(T& t)
{
t->i;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195
--- Comment #4 from Jim Wilson ---
Suppose we move the locking inside the if statement. Suppose newunit_tos is 1.
Two threads hit the statement
if (newunit_tos)
at the same time, and both enter the if block. We then hit the lock. The
first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69448
Tom Honermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at honermann dot net
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81139
--- Comment #1 from Tom Honermann ---
Bug 69448 appears to be related.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81182
--- Comment #5 from bartek 'basz' szurgot ---
Created attachment 41626
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41626&action=edit
gcc 6.3 vs gcc 7.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81182
--- Comment #4 from bartek 'basz' szurgot ---
on my Debian it works on GCC 7.1.0, but not on GCC 6.3.0 (test script
attached):
+ g++-6 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++-6
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/lto-wrapper
Ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80612
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80612
--- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Jun 24 11:05:12 2017
New Revision: 249625
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249625&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/80612
* calls.c (get_size_range):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81182
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to bartek 'basz' szurgot from comment #2)
> looks like the problem is gone in GCC-7.1.
No, doesn't seem to be.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80348
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80348
--- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Jun 24 10:59:00 2017
New Revision: 249624
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249624&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/80348
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): Us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80348
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Jun 24 10:57:01 2017
New Revision: 249623
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249623&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/80348
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_op): Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80244
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80244
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Jun 24 10:53:48 2017
New Revision: 249622
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249622&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80244 - ICE with attribute in template alias.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80241
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80241
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Jun 24 10:50:08 2017
New Revision: 249621
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249621&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80241 - ICE with alignas pack expansion.
* error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81197
--- Comment #1 from ensadc at mailnesia dot com ---
Minimum reproducer:
struct X { int a; };
auto&& [t] = X{};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81197
Bug ID: 81197
Summary: ICE with structured binding and lifetime-extended
temporaries
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81196
Bug ID: 81196
Summary: Number of iterations found for p!=q but not for p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81195
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63361
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Comment on attachment 41624
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41624
test_summary with r249269
anything else we should investigate ?
for instance the mpx failures ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63361
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 41625
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41625&action=edit
ouput of gcc -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow -O2 float-cast-overflow-1.c &&
./a.out
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63361
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to
:/home/ed/gnu/gcc-build/gcc:/home/ed/gnu/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/./libatomic/.libs:/home/ed/gnu/gcc-build/i686-pc-linux-gnu/./libcilkrts/.libs:/home/ed/gnu/gcc-build/i686-pc-li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63361
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 41624
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41624&action=edit
test_summary with r249269
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jun 24 07:07:56 2017
New Revision: 249620
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249620&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/52473
* Makefil
40 matches
Mail list logo
