[Bug tree-optimization/81110] tree-vrp optimize unsigned comparison to signed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81110 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Note you can also use -fwrapv to get the behavior you want.

[Bug tree-optimization/81110] tree-vrp optimize unsigned comparison to signed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81110 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/81110] tree-vrp optimize unsigned comparison to signed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81110 --- Comment #2 from Ada Liu --- Comment on attachment 41567 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41567 reduced testcase > >unsigned short d[2]; >__attribute__ ((noinline))int DiffInt () >{ > if ((unsigned long)(65536*d[1]+d[0]

[Bug tree-optimization/81110] tree-vrp optimize unsigned comparison to signed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81110 --- Comment #1 from Ada Liu --- Comment on attachment 41567 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41567 reduced testcase > >unsigned short d[2]; >__attribute__ ((noinline))int DiffInt () >{ > if ((unsigned long)(65536*d[1]+d[0]

[Bug tree-optimization/81110] New: tree-vrp optimize unsigned comparison to signed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81110 Bug ID: 81110 Summary: tree-vrp optimize unsigned comparison to signed Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug c++/81109] [8 Regression] new -Wclass-memaccess warning noisy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81109 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >Not sure what to do, perhaps moving the warning to -Wextra? I would not move it to that as most people I know do -W -Wall (-W is still an alias to -Wextra).

[Bug c++/81109] New: [8 Regression] new -Wclass-memaccess warning noisy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81109 Bug ID: 81109 Summary: [8 Regression] new -Wclass-memaccess warning noisy Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/80887] gnat bootstrap fails at s-regpat.o: raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow or erroneous memory access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80887 --- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse --- I haven't thought of anything significantly better than adding a counter to bound the recursion depth of calls to gimple_simplify or gimple_resimplify2. We could try to explicitly detect loops, storing in some

[Bug c++/80560] warn on undefined memory operations involving non-trivial types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80560 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Patch committed in r249234.

[Bug tree-optimization/80523] -Wformat-overflow doesn't consider -fexec-charset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80523 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) > Patch committed in r247401. Wrong bug. --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) > Patch committed in r247401. Wrong bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/80523] -Wformat-overflow doesn't consider -fexec-charset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80523 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) > Patch committed in r247401. Wrong bug.

[Bug c++/80560] warn on undefined memory operations involving non-trivial types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80560 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/80523] -Wformat-overflow doesn't consider -fexec-charset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80523 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Patch committed in r247401.

[Bug c++/80560] warn on undefined memory operations involving non-trivial types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80560 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Fri Jun 16 03:48:59 2017 New Revision: 249234 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249234&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/80560 - warn on undefined memory operations involving non-trivial t

[Bug c++/80831] [6/7/8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with -fsyntax-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80831 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug fortran/80009] Printing/writing a structure with a real edit descriptor.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80009 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libgomp/81108] OpenMP doacross (omp do/for ordered) performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81108 --- Comment #6 from Jeff Hammond --- Created attachment 41566 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41566&action=edit tasks C++

[Bug libgomp/81108] OpenMP doacross (omp do/for ordered) performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81108 --- Comment #5 from Jeff Hammond --- Created attachment 41565 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41565&action=edit header for C++ codes

[Bug libgomp/81108] OpenMP doacross (omp do/for ordered) performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81108 --- Comment #4 from Jeff Hammond --- Created attachment 41564 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41564&action=edit doacross C++

[Bug libgomp/81108] OpenMP doacross (omp do/for ordered) performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81108 --- Comment #3 from Jeff Hammond --- Created attachment 41563 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41563&action=edit sequential C++

[Bug libgomp/81108] OpenMP doacross (omp do/for ordered) performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81108 --- Comment #2 from Jeff Hammond --- Created attachment 41562 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41562&action=edit tasks Fortran This code runs faster than serial (assuming blocking is used), showing that this pattern can be pa

[Bug libgomp/81108] OpenMP doacross (omp do/for ordered) performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81108 --- Comment #1 from Jeff Hammond --- Created attachment 41561 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41561&action=edit doacross Fortran

[Bug libgomp/81108] New: OpenMP doacross (omp do/for ordered) performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81108 Bug ID: 81108 Summary: OpenMP doacross (omp do/for ordered) performance Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ada/81105] system-freebsd-x86.ads renamed but referenced by gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81105 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/81105] system-freebsd-x86.ads renamed but referenced by gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81105 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Jun 15 22:22:18 2017 New Revision: 249229 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249229&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ada/81105 * gcc-interface/Makefile.in (x86 kfreebsd

[Bug ada/81105] system-freebsd-x86.ads renamed but referenced by gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81105 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Jun 15 22:21:56 2017 New Revision: 249228 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249228&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ada/81105 * gcc-interface/Makefile.in (x86 kfreebsd

[Bug ada/81105] system-freebsd-x86.ads renamed but referenced by gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81105 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/80639] [7/8 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code: in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:4642

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80639 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c++/80639] [7/8 Regression] ICE on valid C++11 code: in cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr, at cp/constexpr.c:4642

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80639 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/80983] [F03] memory leak when calling procedure-pointer component with allocatable result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80983 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug c++/81074] [7/8 Regression] Nested template specialization causes segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81074 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/80983] [F03] memory leak when calling procedure-pointer component with allocatable result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80983 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Thu Jun 15 21:17:48 2017 New Revision: 249227 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249227&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2017-06-15 Janus Weil PR fortran/80983 * tra

[Bug c/66970] Add __has_builtin() macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66970 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/81093] [OOP] Accessing ranges of values in derived types leads to wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81093 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3) > > ! wrong result > > write(*,*) gen_data%mydata(:)%data1(1), gen_data%mydata(:)%data1(2) > > As said before I am not sure this is valid (a d

[Bug target/79581] VFP4 slower than VFP3 in C-ray on Cortex A5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79581 --- Comment #8 from PeteVine --- I've just confirmed the result on a newer Linux distribution (Ubuntu 16.04) and the difference between VFPv3 and v4 is clearly there (2330 vs 2560) using gcc 5.4. Unless the CPU itself requires an erratum, that

[Bug lto/69866] lto1: internal compiler error: in add_symbol_to_partition_1, at lto/lto-partition.c:158

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69866 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Thu Jun 15 18:42:10 2017 New Revision: 249224 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249224&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/69866 * lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_symbols):

[Bug c++/81107] New: operator new(size_t) can't have hidden visibility

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81107 Bug ID: 81107 Summary: operator new(size_t) can't have hidden visibility Product: gcc Version: 6.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/79581] VFP4 slower than VFP3 in C-ray on Cortex A5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79581 --- Comment #7 from PeteVine --- Thanks, I promise to test any patches without delay :)

[Bug ada/81106] New: gnatchop -r misplaces BOM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81106 Bug ID: 81106 Summary: gnatchop -r misplaces BOM Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee: u

[Bug ada/81105] New: system-freebsd-x86.ads renamed but referenced by gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81105 Bug ID: 81105 Summary: system-freebsd-x86.ads renamed but referenced by gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug rtl-optimization/70398] [6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-9.c FAILs with -fno-tree-loop-optimize -fno-tree-ter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70398 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- This testcase fails on machines which don't have the static libc installed.

[Bug ada/81104] New: gnattools: LDFLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed has no effect after the libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81104 Bug ID: 81104 Summary: gnattools: LDFLAGS=-Wl,--as-needed has no effect after the libraries Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/81103] New: gcc/ada/terminals.c: please remove unused termio.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81103 Bug ID: 81103 Summary: gcc/ada/terminals.c: please remove unused termio.h Product: gcc Version: 7.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug fortran/44646] [F08] Implement DO CONCURRENT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44646 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koeni

[Bug bootstrap/80897] [8 regression] gnat bootstrap broken on SPARC64/Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80897 --- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 41554 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41554&action=edit Self-contained testcase To be gnatchop'ed and compiled at -O at least.

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

t;r30"); } configure --target=powerpc-elf --enable-languages=c --disable-multilib ./cc1 -O2 t.c -o - f: [...] lwz 11,0(1) lwz 0,4(11) mr 1,11 -- hmmm lwz 28,-16(11) mtlr 0 lwz 29,-12(11) -- err lwz 30,-8(11) lwz 31,-4(

[Bug c++/81102] New: G++ wrong error report for partial template specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81102 Bug ID: 81102 Summary: G++ wrong error report for partial template specialization Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/80367] internal compiler error: in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:16549

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80367 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lindsay at arista dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c/81100] ICE from x86 __asm__() statck manipulation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81100 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|U

[Bug rtl-optimization/80474] [6 regression] ipa-cp wrongly adding LO(symbol) twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80474 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/78818] msp430 persistent attribute is not applied correctly in some cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78818 --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Author: nickc Date: Thu Jun 15 13:38:52 2017 New Revision: 249222 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249222&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix problems with the MSP430 port's handling of persistent data. P

[Bug rtl-optimization/80474] [6 regression] ipa-cp wrongly adding LO(symbol) twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80474 --- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Jun 15 13:25:56 2017 New Revision: 249221 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249221&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/80474 * reorg.c (update_block): D

[Bug rtl-optimization/80474] [6 regression] ipa-cp wrongly adding LO(symbol) twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80474 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Jun 15 13:25:33 2017 New Revision: 249220 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249220&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/80474 * reorg.c (update_block): D

[Bug rtl-optimization/80474] [6 regression] ipa-cp wrongly adding LO(symbol) twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80474 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Jun 15 13:24:53 2017 New Revision: 249219 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249219&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/80474 * reorg.c (update_block): D

[Bug target/78385] Build of libgcc2 for target arm-eabi fails, if configuration --with-abi=apcs-gnu is used (in GCC-Build)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78385 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/81036] -fcall-saved-X does not work for floating-point registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81036 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/79581] VFP4 slower than VFP3 in C-ray on Cortex A5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79581 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/80905] ARM: Useless initialization of struct passed by value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80905 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81012] ARM: Spill instead of register copy / dead store on int-to-double conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81012 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization S

[Bug fortran/81093] [OOP] Accessing ranges of values in derived types leads to wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81093 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > ! wrong result > write(*,*) gen_data%mydata(:)%data1(1), gen_data%mydata(:)%data1(2) As said before I am not sure this is valid (a data_type2 object printed a data_type1 one). If it is, the outp

[Bug fortran/81093] [OOP] Accessing ranges of values in derived types leads to wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81093 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|

[Bug fortran/81093] Accessing ranges of values in derived types leads to wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81093 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Confirmed. Slightly reduced test case: program test implicit none type data_type1 integer, dimension(2) :: data1 = (/1,2/) end type type, extends(data_type1) :: data_type2 integ

[Bug fortran/81093] Accessing ranges of values in derived types leads to wrong result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81093 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/81095] fcheck=bounds and empty forall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81095 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/81101] New: ICE with -fself-test=.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81101 Bug ID: 81101 Summary: ICE with -fself-test=. Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-checking Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/81089] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in register_edge_assert_for_2, at tree-vrp.c:5023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089 --- Comment #8 from Yuri Gribov --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #7) > You could try again: https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/users/new/ > From what I understand they have a new admin team in place. > In the past the account creatio

[Bug libstdc++/80940] [7/8 Regression] Private inheritance from std::ostream - compilation error for custom operator <

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80940 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Last reconfirmed|2017-

[Bug target/71663] aarch64 Vector initialization can be improved slightly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71663 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/31447] set intent(out) arguments to uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31447 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2007-04-18 07:08:17 |2017-6-15 CC|

[Bug fortran/34871] Flavor VARIABLE vs. FUNCTION: Accepts invalid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34871 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2008-11-18 19:35:34 |2017-6-15 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koe

[Bug fortran/41165] -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41165 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ada/81087] array index out of range in gnatlink, making test always false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81087 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou -

[Bug sanitizer/81097] UBSAN: false positive for not existing negation operator and a bogus message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81097 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/35095] DATA with implied-do: Improve bounds checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35095 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2009-03-29 08:23:20 |2017-6-15 CC|

[Bug ada/81087] array index out of range in gnatlink, making test always false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81087 --- Comment #2 from nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr --- > s/-gnatn/-gnatp I presume. Yes. > So can you write a testcase which demonstrates the malfunction of gnatlink? The changes related to the Arg string probably only increase readability. A

[Bug c++/81099] A single `decltype(this)` at top level triggers 2 identical error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81099 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug tree-optimization/81089] [8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in register_edge_assert_for_2, at tree-vrp.c:5023

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Yuri Gribov from comment #6) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5) > > (In reply to Yuri Gribov from comment #4) > > > Created attachment 41551 [details] > > > Draft patch > >