https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089
--- Comment #6 from Yuri Gribov ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5)
> (In reply to Yuri Gribov from comment #4)
> > Created attachment 41551 [details]
> > Draft patch
> >
> > Here's a draft patch. It fixes the repro but bootstr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Yuri Gribov from comment #4)
> Created attachment 41551 [details]
> Draft patch
>
> Here's a draft patch. It fixes the repro but bootstrapping will take some
> time on my notebook.
There
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81100
Bug ID: 81100
Summary: ICE from x86 __asm__() statck manipulation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81099
Bug ID: 81099
Summary: A single `decltype(this)` at top level triggers 2
identical error messages
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth ---
Jan,
can you *please* have a look at this bug? Darwin bootstrap is broken for
almost
a week with no signs of activity to fix this!
Thanks.
Rainer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81098
Bug ID: 81098
Summary: backtrace_pcinfo initialization not thread safe
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79799
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81097
Bug ID: 81097
Summary: UBSAN: false positive for not existing negation
operator and a bogus message
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096
--- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
10001510 :
10001510: 03 10 40 3c lis r2,4099
10001514: 00 7f 42 38 addir2,r2,32512
10001518: a6 02 08 7c mflrr0
1000151c: 10 00 01 f8 st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81096
Bug ID: 81096
Summary: [8 regression] test case ttest in libbacktrace fail
starting with r249111
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81095
Bug ID: 81095
Summary: fcheck=bounds and empty forall
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81094
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81094
Bug ID: 81094
Summary: -fsanitize=object-size does not instrument aggregate
call arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81093
Bug ID: 81093
Summary: Accessing ranges of values in derived types leads to
wrong result
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81090
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81083
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jun 14 11:43:31 2017
New Revision: 249193
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249193&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/81083
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jun 14 11:40:20 2017
New Revision: 249192
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249192&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-14 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/81088
* fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81092
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15272
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81069
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to me from comment #1)
> With trunk r239357, the problem disappears when disabling the "Neuter whole
> SESE regions" optimization:
>
> --- gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.c
> +++ gcc/config/nvptx/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81092
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81092
Bug ID: 81092
Summary: Missing symbols for new std::wstring constructors
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: link-failure
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71663
--- Comment #1 from naveenh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: naveenh
Date: Wed Jun 14 10:20:07 2017
New Revision: 249187
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249187&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71663
gcc
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Gribov ---
Created attachment 41551
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41551&action=edit
Draft patch
Here's a draft patch. It fixes the repro but bootstrapping will take some time
on my notebook.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81090
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Ah, it is CFG cleanup removing a loop exit edge but not updating loop info it
seems. So when remove_edge calls rescan_loop_exit it doesn't adjust bounds.
So either we are not supposed to keep those "live" a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81040
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/google/s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81090
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80829
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80829
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58541
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81091
Bug ID: 81091
Summary: libstdc++ not built with large file support
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 58541, which changed state.
Bug 58541 Summary: [c++11] Bogus "error: redeclaration ... differs in
‘constexpr’"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58541
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58541
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jun 14 09:18:57 2017
New Revision: 249186
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249186&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-14 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58541
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58541
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is fixed in 7.1.0. I'm adding a testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81090
Bug ID: 81090
Summary: [8 Regression] [graphite] ICE in loop_preheader_edge
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
And the issue is that
associate:
...
/* Only do something if we found more than two objects. Otherwise,
nothing has changed and we risk infinite recursion. */
if (ok
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80998
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41524|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089
--- Comment #3 from Yuri Gribov ---
Mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81088
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81085
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80998
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Having some experience with the sanopt code, I can help with that.
Ok, if you want, I'll leave that part out for now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81086
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80998
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Then what we need and this patch doesn't implement is a sanopt optimization
> similer to the UBSAN_NULL opts, if we have checked already ptr + i doesn't
> overflo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81089
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81083
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
Summary|[7/8 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81083
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jun 14 07:22:32 2017
New Revision: 249182
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249182&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-14 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/81083
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81086
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
51 matches
Mail list logo
