https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81053
Bug ID: 81053
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in as_a,
at is-a.h:192
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ryan.burn at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41535
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41535&action=edit
preprocessed code
Using gcc:
g++ (GCC) 8.0.0 20170610 (experimental)
Copyr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81041
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58820
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81051
Bug ID: 81051
Summary: lambda capture of this in initialization list with
virtual inheritance
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81050
Bug ID: 81050
Summary: ICE with -fexec-charset=utf-16
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025
--- Comment #9 from Doug Gilmore ---
> I bet this is a bug in reorg.c. It is the least used code (major
> target usage: MIPS and sparc only) and also one of the more buggy
> code.
You're right, compiling with -fno-delayed-branch doesn't tickle t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25967
Anatol changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anatol.pomozov at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #31 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Dominique,
I had suspected that. Thanks for the confirmation!
Cheers
Paul
On 10 June 2017 at 18:46, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Le 10 juin 2017 à 19:40, pault at gcc dot gnu.org
> a écrit :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
>
> --- Comment #29 from Paul Thomas ---
> Created attachment 41534
> --> h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #29 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 41534
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41534&action=edit
An unpolished patch for the bug
Dear All,
Since I am not going to have any time to fix the array descriptor ref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81033
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8 Regression] Bootstrap|[8 Regression] Revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80009
--- Comment #12 from Walt Brainerd ---
I made a misstatement in my previous message.
gfortran 7.0.1 does not accept this.
Sorry, my "test" was not correct.
I am going to post a query to comp-fortran-90 to see what others think.
On Fri, Jun 9,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80949
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
>
> I'll leave the debug session open; let me know if you need any more info...
Never mind, I closed the debugger, but can reopen it if necessary. Here's an
even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80941
Sebastian Peryt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81045
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> How often or how important is this feature? Would it improve any known
> benchmark or real world application in a significant manner?
Egg and chicken problem! If CSHIFT is slow, nobody will use it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
Daniel Santos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41532|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #7)
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6)
> > Created attachment 41508 [details]
> > What an unrolled cshift could look like
> >
> > This is what an unrolled v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
Daniel Santos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41486|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80988
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80988
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jun 10 10:07:13 2017
New Revision: 249092
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249092&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/80988
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41520|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81049
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||luc.vanoostenryck at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81047
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
What the error message is saying is if you use thread_local instead of
__thread; it would work (and c++11 or higher).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On June 10, 2017 7:55:31 AM GMT+02:00, "doug.gilmore at imgtec dot com"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81025
>
>Doug Gilmore changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81049
Bug ID: 81049
Summary: no warning for simple uninitialized variables
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81048
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80897
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80897
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Summary|gnat bootstrap br
32 matches
Mail list logo