https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80950
--- Comment #3 from 陈林熙 ---
You're right. ISO IEC 14882 explicitly illustrates this.
In GCC5.3, you can write a global function:
template int (get) {}
Cheat the compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80892
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80892
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Sat Jun 3 02:49:30 2017
New Revision: 248852
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248852&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/80892 - -Wfloat-conversion now warns about non-floats
gcc/c-family/C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80949
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> This is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I tried various combinations of the above
> options but I'm always seeing some errors. Perhaps it would be possible to
> isolate th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68754
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
Testcase committed. Before resolving, however, I'm going to double check that
we are already tracking the diagnostic issue in C++11 mode noticed by Andrew
(for sure isn't new to me!).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68754
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Jun 2 23:27:22 2017
New Revision: 248847
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248847&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-02 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/68754
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80945
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80921
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou ---
> BTW, although I am now able to build the DLLs, install-strip does not strip
> the installed copies; should it?
Probably, but in my experience stripping can have unexpected fallout.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68754
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80904
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80904
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Jun 2 19:29:29 2017
New Revision: 248845
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248845&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-02 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/80904
Backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80921
--- Comment #15 from Keith Marshall ---
Created attachment 41464
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41464&action=edit
Patch to create gnatlib import libraries for Win32
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #14)
> In any case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162
--- Comment #13 from David Abdurachmanov
---
Created attachment 41463
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41463&action=edit
This is just minimized *.ii file
I am also adding PGOInstrumentation2.cpp.xz, which is just slightly mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80962
--- Comment #1 from Olivier Kannengieser ---
Inside the comment section BUGGY CODE, the second commented line should be
uncommented to see that gcc does not complaning for private access violation.
The attached file is the version which causes g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68374
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80962
Bug ID: 80962
Summary: No more access violation control after certain
declarations using concepts
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80624
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 2 18:35:37 2017
New Revision: 248843
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248843&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80624 satisfy invariant for char_traits::eof()
PR l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68374
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|xyzdragon at fastmail dot fm |
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162
--- Comment #12 from David Abdurachmanov
---
I have attached minimized file (PGOInstrumentation.cpp) from LLVM.
Compile line: g++ -c PGOInstrumentation.cpp
Result:
PGOInstrumentation.cpp: In constructor
'{anonymous}::PGOInstrumentationUseLegac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162
--- Comment #11 from David Abdurachmanov
---
Created attachment 41461
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41461&action=edit
Minimized file from LLVM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27198|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80904
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Jun 2 17:44:19 2017
New Revision: 248842
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248842&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-02 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/80904
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> Richard also says the overload shouldn't exist and is a bug, but the
> overload has to exist, because the C++17 draft is defective.
That's https://wg21.link
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80954
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|amd64 Linux |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
I thought I recognized the Maple style here :-)
Compiling with 6.3.0 on a machine with enough memory gives
(gdb) r -fdefault-integer-8 -O2 tst.f90
Starting program: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/6/f951 -fde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80954
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Jun 2 17:07:37 2017
New Revision: 248841
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248841&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix segfault in free_growth_caches (PR jit/80954)
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
--- Comment #3 from Nikolay Kuzminykh ---
Yes, this code is somewhat artificial. Large part of the code is
machine-generated using computer algebra system (commercial Maplesoft Maple).
As for memory limits, it is Virtualbox machine with followin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at pushface dot org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
--- Comment #1 from Nikolay Kuzminykh ---
compiling with options "-g0 -O0" is OK.
-O1 and -O2 options lead to problems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80949
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
This is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I tried various combinations of the above options
but I'm always seeing some errors. Perhaps it would be possible to isolate the
function where the crash occurs and thus get rid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80961
Bug ID: 80961
Summary: Constructor preferred over conversion operator, when
should be ambiguous
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80949
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> I can't reproduce; I get some errors:
>
> $ ./cc1obj -quiet nsselect.mi -fobjc-exceptions
> In file included from lisp.h:39:0,
> from nsselect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
Bug ID: 80960
Summary: [regression since 4.9.2] gfortran crashes when
compiling f90 file with msg "Out of memory: Kill
process 538 (f951)"
Product: gcc
Version: 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62170
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80944
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Good point! It never occurred to me. That explains why no compiler does it.
That suggests that the optimization opportunity is up to the user. I.e., a
class like std::string could optimize this case by add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80948
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
Bug 66313 depends on bug 80948, which changed state.
Bug 80948 Summary: [8 regression] test case gcc.dg/torture/pr68017.c fails with
ICE starting with r248771
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80948
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80959
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80882
seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80954
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80959
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80959
--- Comment #1 from Simon Marchi ---
Forgot to mention, the initial problem I stumbled on was this function:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=bfd/mach-o-i386.c;h=b2f02415c3ae019224b25184539237d530c5bc7e;hb=HEAD#l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80959
Bug ID: 80959
Summary: -Wreturn-type "control reaches end of non-void
function" false positive with -fsanitize=address
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80815
--- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #6)
> Created attachment 41456 [details]
> sparc-sun-solaris2.12 pr80815-3.c.156t.vect
Thanks for reporting, I will investigate it and disable on targets if it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80957
--- Comment #2 from bokorn at tvn dot hu ---
tried to attach preprocessed source, but I kept getting server errors :-/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80948
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jun 2 12:34:32 2017
New Revision: 248824
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248824&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-02 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/80948
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80957
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80958
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Note the loop in question does very sparse accesses which have high load/store
cost (in the attached dump), it also contains conditionals so the more precise
accounting might have just pushed the cost over t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80958
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80958
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80958
Bug ID: 80958
Summary: [8 regression] gcc.target/i386/pr70021.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80815
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80948
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc*-*-*|powerpc*-*-*, sparc*-*-*
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80957
Bug ID: 80957
Summary: internal compiler error when building Qt 5.9 source
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80939
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71607
--- Comment #15 from prakhar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: prakhar
Date: Fri Jun 2 11:19:16 2017
New Revision: 248822
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248822&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR71607: Fix ICE when loading constant
2017-06-02 Prakhar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80951
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80950
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See https://womble.decadent.org.uk/c++/template-faq.html#disambiguation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80955
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80955
Bug ID: 80955
Summary: Macros expanded in definition of user-defined literals
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80954
Bug ID: 80954
Summary: JIT make check regression for GCC 8.0
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80952
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
I was actually talking about generic atomic add and fetch optimization and not
one directly related to profiling data.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80952
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Yep, there's my initial attempt to do that:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/685796/
But as I discussed with Richi, he prefers more generic approach to have local
counters being updated at function exits.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80952
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think it might be interesting to optimize relaxed atomic adds such that we
can pull the add out if the loop.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80952
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|missed-optimization |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80952
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect this is due to using atomic increments for the profile data now.
Before there were many race conditions and profile arch would produce incorrect
values for threaded (openmp is such) code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80952
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 41453
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41453&action=edit
Add SPARC ASan support in GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 41452
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41452&action=edit
Adapt c-c++-common/ubsan/float-cast-overflow-1.c for Solaris
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80948
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 41451
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41451&action=edit
Basic libsanitizer Solaris support: x86 GCC side
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 41450
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41450&action=edit
Basic libsanitizer Solaris support
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80953
Bug ID: 80953
Summary: Support libsanitizer on Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80930
--- Comment #2 from Franz Sirl ---
Further investigation shows that "-O2 -fsanitize=undefined" is enough to
trigger the excessive memory usage.
The big difference between GCC-6 and GCC-7 is that the function causing this
has ~20 blocks in GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80948
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80952
Bug ID: 80952
Summary: gcc 7.1.1 has a drastic performance downgrade using
"-fprofile-arcs" compared to 6.3.1 version
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
--- Comment #27 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Still present at revision r248811. Any chance to get this fixed?
Did you try what I suggested in comment #16 as a stopgap measure? No GNAT
developer builds the mainline compiler on Darwin regularly so th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80950
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80946
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-*-*
Component|othe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80944
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80938
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80903
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 2 08:12:33 2017
New Revision: 248817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/80903
* loop-doloop.c (add_test): Unsh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80556
--- Comment #26 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Still present at revision r248811. Any chance to get this fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80721
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jun 2 08:10:48 2017
New Revision: 248816
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248816&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-06-02 Richard Biener
Markus Eisenmann
PR lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80721
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||8.0
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80903
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 2 08:07:15 2017
New Revision: 248815
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248815&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/80903
* loop-doloop.c (add_test): Unsh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925
--- Comment #9 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
I built --with-cpu=power7 and still see TARGET_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_VSX == true
in the backend which causes unaligned stores to have costs of 1. On my power7
system, TARGET_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80951
Bug ID: 80951
Summary: Deducing noexcept only works when also deducing
something else
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80822
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 2 07:27:49 2017
New Revision: 248814
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248814&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2017-05-30 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80950
Bug ID: 80950
Summary: GCC about template bug
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80918
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 2 07:10:10 2017
New Revision: 248813
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248813&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/80918
* openmp.c (resolve_omp_clauses): Fix a t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80918
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 2 07:07:29 2017
New Revision: 248812
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248812&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/80918
* openmp.c (resolve_omp_clauses): Fix a t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80949
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
97 matches
Mail list logo