https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
Bug 51119 depends on bug 37131, which changed state.
Bug 37131 Summary: inline matmul for small matrix sizes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854
Bug 36854 depends on bug 37131, which changed state.
Bug 37131 Summary: inline matmul for small matrix sizes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
--- Comment #33 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon May 29 06:03:23 2017
New Revision: 248553
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248553&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-29 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/37131
* fronten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Manfred Schwarb from comment #10)
> As I understand this patch applies to read and write.
> How does this optimization behave regarding my pet issue (short array reads)?
>
> I.e.
> progra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029
--- Comment #6 from Manfred Schwarb ---
Will do tomorrow.
Thanks for your patch, I hadn't seen your comments here when
I wrote my comment to bug 35339 ...
We had seemingly the same association when reading nicolas' patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
--- Comment #18 from Daniel Santos ---
I intended to respond to your comments from 6 days ago sooner, but better late
than never! Again, sorry for the delay
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #14)
> You need to make certain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
Manfred Schwarb changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manfred99 at gmx dot ch
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The patch regression tested OK. Manfred can you test for yourself? At least on
this test case we are getting biggly better!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80908
Bug ID: 80908
Summary: [c++1z] ICE on instantiating a template deducing the
noexcept-ness of a function pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80737
--- Comment #7 from Tim Shen ---
Author: timshen
Date: Sun May 28 21:27:30 2017
New Revision: 248548
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248548&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/80737
* include/std/variant(variant::variant): SFINAE on is_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80907
Bug ID: 80907
Summary: False positive: "warning: array subscript is above
array bounds"
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66971
bert hubert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ahu at ds9a dot nl
--- Comment #1 from ber
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80906
Bug ID: 80906
Summary: [7/8 Regression] ICE in copy_loop_close_phi_args, at
graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2094
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80905
Bug ID: 80905
Summary: ARM: Useless initialization of struct passed by value
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80904
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Summary|[6/7/8 Reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80904
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80904
Bug ID: 80904
Summary: [6/7/8 Regression] Matmul result allocated to wrong
size
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80903
Bug ID: 80903
Summary: [8 Regression] ICE: internal consistency failure
(error: invalid rtl sharing found in the insn)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80902
Bug ID: 80902
Summary: A problem in expand_builtin_atomic_fetch_op
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80887
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
Created attachment 41431
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41431&action=edit
Updated version of the reverted patch
Here is an updated version of the reverted patch, which fixes the vector is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80898
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/8.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 8.0.0 20170528 (experimental
24 matches
Mail list logo