https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80510
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri May 26 01:52:24 2017
New Revision: 248480
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248480&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-05-25 Michael Meissner
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68163
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri May 26 01:52:24 2017
New Revision: 248480
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248480&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-05-25 Michael Meissner
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71451
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE on |[5/6/7 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79652
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7/8 Regression] ICE on |[5/6/7 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79652
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu May 25 22:29:40 2017
New Revision: 248474
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248474&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-25 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/79652
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71451
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu May 25 22:28:54 2017
New Revision: 248473
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248473&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-25 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/71451
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78379
--- Comment #37 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu May 25 21:51:27 2017
New Revision: 248472
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248472&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-25 Thomas Koenig
PR libfortran/78379
* Make
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80605
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu May 25 21:24:36 2017
New Revision: 248470
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248470&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80605 - __is_standard_layout and zero-length array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80803
--- Comment #15 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Thanks for looking into this. What you are seeing is odd and I have no
explanation. Can you try building the test with GOCFLAGS="-g -O2
-fgo-dump-ast" which should give you a .go.dump.ast file in the wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80867
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64le-linux-gnu |powerpc64le-linux-gnu,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
--- Comment #16 from Daniel Santos ---
Sorry for my delayed response. I'm working on adding extended tests triggered
by an environment variable (because I needed to better validate somebody else's
changes to my -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues feature and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80884
Bug ID: 80884
Summary: [8 regression] test case
gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c fails starting with
r247886
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79583
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/pr79583.C -std=c++1z (test for errors, line 3)
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:33 AM, paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79583
>
> --- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79583
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/pr79583.C -std=c++1z (test for errors, line 3)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
Nicolas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41419|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80883
Bug ID: 80883
Summary: Hardcoded null DSO handle parameter to
__cxa_thread_atexit() on MinGW-w64 targets
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339
Nicolas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80882
Bug ID: 80882
Summary: [8 regression] test case gfortran.dg/pr48636.f90 fails
starting with r248375
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80859
--- Comment #22 from Thorsten Kurth ---
Hello Jakub,
that is stuff for Intel vTune. I have commented it out and added the NUM_TEAMS
defines in the GNUmakefile. Please pull the latest changes.
Best and thanks
Thorsten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80859
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It doesn't compile for me.
cmake -DENABLE_MPI=0 -DENABLE_OpenMP=1 ..
make -j16
I don't have ittnotify.h, I've tried to comment that out as well as the _itt*
calls, but then run into:
/usr/src/BoxLib/Src/Lin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That suggests TLS doesn't work at all on your platform (but then you should
obviously not --enable-tls).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80881
Bug ID: 80881
Summary: [7.1 Regression] null pointer access in libgomp.h
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80803
--- Comment #14 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
I have found the incorrect code that is causing this test to fail but not sure
what causes it. My previous theory was not correct.
The problem is that the second argument being passed to runtime.D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80859
--- Comment #20 from Thorsten Kurth ---
To compile the code, edit the GNUmakefile to suit your needs (feel free to ask
any questions) and in order to run it run the generated executable, called
something like
main3d.XXX...
and the XXX tell
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80880
Bug ID: 80880
Summary: internal compiler error: in ix86_expand_builtin
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80754
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80671
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80879
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80879
Bug ID: 80879
Summary: False positive for -fsanitize-address-use-after-scope
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80754
--- Comment #6 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Thu May 25 15:12:49 2017
New Revision: 248463
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248463&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
When lra-remat rematerializes an instruction with a clobber, it checks
that the cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80671
--- Comment #3 from Wilco ---
Author: wilco
Date: Thu May 25 15:10:01 2017
New Revision: 248461
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248461&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Move an use-after-free access before the delete.
Backport from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80867
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I just got the following building trunk on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no special
flags, just $srcdir/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,ada --enable-werror
/home/jwakely/src/gcc/bootstrap/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, I didn't say it's lock-free, but the code can be compiled and linked.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
--- Comment #4 from admin_public at liblfds dot org ---
I've had a look at the libatomic source code. Obviously, it's problematic to
be sure you're understanding a large code base correctly when you go to it for
the first time and you're looking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80822
--- Comment #7 from Nathan Weeks ---
The Cray 8.5.4 compiler supports only OpenMP 4.0, and so lacks support for
omp_get_num_places(), omp_get_place_num_procs(), and omp_get_place_proc_ids().
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
libatomic provides a definition for __atomic_compare_exchange_16 when the
native instruction isn't available.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
--- Comment #2 from admin_public at liblfds dot org ---
Am I right in understanding your comment to mean 128 bit CAS is no longer
supported for x86_64?
I publish a library of lock-free data structures, liblfds. It has some users,
include AT&T, R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80822
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Weeks ---
Created attachment 41417
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41417&action=edit
output from comment #4 code compiled with Intel 17.0.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80822
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Weeks ---
Created attachment 41416
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41416&action=edit
output from comment #4 code compiled with gcc 6.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80878
Bug ID: 80878
Summary: -mcx16 (enable 128 bit CAS) on x86_64 seems not to
work
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80306
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul.hua.gm at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79652
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
This seems already fixed in trunk. I guess we can as well add the testcase and
of course keep the bug open.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79583
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68578
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79583
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu May 25 09:32:46 2017
New Revision: 248451
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248451&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-25 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/79583
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68578
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu May 25 09:32:06 2017
New Revision: 248450
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248450&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-25 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/68578
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80822
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That just means they don't provide really helpful information on what they
expand threads to. Can you try:
#include
#include
#include
int
main ()
{
int num_places = omp_get_num_places (), i, j;
print
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80874
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
50 matches
Mail list logo
