https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80852
Bug ID: 80852
Summary: Optimisation missed for loop with condition that is
always true
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80851
Bug ID: 80851
Summary: All versions that support C++11 are confused by
combination of inherited constructors with member
initializer that captures this
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78204
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #3)
> As I'm reading the source code, there's no option to do that.
> Apart from 'no_sanitize' attribute, GCC supports 'no_sanitize_undefined'
> attribute (clang does n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70265
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70265
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun May 21 22:20:05 2017
New Revision: 248313
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248313&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-05-21 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/70265
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70265
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
This is fixed in 7.1.0. I'm adding testcases and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80850
Bug ID: 80850
Summary: Sourced allocate() fails to allocate a pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #11 from DB ---
This still occurs in 6.3.0
In the duplicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80849
I showed that whether or not this occurs can sometimes (I say because my
results don't seem consistent with everyone els
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
--- Comment #10 from DB ---
*** Bug 80849 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80849
DB changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80849
DB changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55922
DB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||db0451 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from DB ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80849
DB changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80849
--- Comment #1 from DB ---
(In reply to DB from comment #0)
> With additional testing, on 6.3.0, I determined that - much like that other
> old bug - this problem only occurs if the virtual base constructor and the
> constructors of the intermedi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80849
Bug ID: 80849
Summary: Brace-init causes multiple runs of virtual base ctor
if its signature differs from its derived classes'
ctors
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80847
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66313
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||babokin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #9)
> (In reply to janus from comment #8)
> > This shows one ICE in the testsuite:
> >
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/typebound_proc_32.f90 -O (internal compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80766
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
--- Comment #12 from Daniel Santos ---
Created attachment 41398
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41398&action=edit
proposed fix v2 part 2
Formatting, comments and other aesthetic changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80256
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
Daniel Santos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41396|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80759
Daniel Santos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41386|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80848
Bug ID: 80848
Summary: /crtend.o(.eh_frame); no .eh_frame_hdr table will be
created
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80847
Dmitry Babokin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||babokin at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80847
Bug ID: 80847
Summary: UBSAN: yet another false positive (part2)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80597
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41375|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80830
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Reduced test-case:
template class a;
class b
{
friend int operator>> (int, b);
};
template int &operator>> (int &, a &);
template class a
{
friend int &operator>><> (int &, a &);
a<>
d ()
{
}
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80610
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Results on a Corei7 2.8Ghz with 16Gb of RAM
for 512^3
% time gfc pr80610_db.f90 -finit-real=nan
329.364u 16.328s 5:58.24 96.4% 0+0k 3+1197io 599275pf+0w
% ll ./a.out
-rwxr-xr-x 1 dominiq staff 536
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80842
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80840
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80830
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80831
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80831
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2017-5-21
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52473
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80838
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #1)
> If it is easy to do, can you attach profiles please?
> i will try to reproduce this...
Thanks.
(There is still some tooling missing (perf, etc.) on the Ryze
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80743
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80845
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 41393
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41393&action=edit
tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80845
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
Likewise, a split reg example in gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/nvptx/abi-vararg-2.c:
...
//(insn 29 27 30 4
// (set (reg:DI 40)
// (subreg:DI (reg:TI 23) 0)) 5 {*movdi_insn}
// (nil))
39 matches
Mail list logo
