https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160
Bug 80160 depends on bug 80148, which changed state.
Bug 80148 Summary: [7 Regression] operand has impossible constraints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80148
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80148
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80159
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70974
Dan Mick changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmick at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80181
Bug ID: 80181
Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at
tree-ssa-ccp.c:505
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Sat Mar 25 01:12:04 2017
New Revision: 246473
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246473&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/80160
PR rtl-optimization/80159
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80159
--- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Sat Mar 25 01:12:04 2017
New Revision: 246473
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246473&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/80160
PR rtl-optimization/80159
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80180
Bug ID: 80180
Summary: Incorrect codegen from rdseed intrinsic use
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #48 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #47)
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #46)
> > Yes, it seems, the __attribute__((may_alias)) does not propagate from
> > structure members to enclosing st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
--- Comment #21 from Michael Meissner ---
The backport to GCC 6 also succeeded with no regressions on a little endian
power8 system.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #47 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #46)
> Yes, it seems, the __attribute__((may_alias)) does not propagate from
> structure members to enclosing structure:
What enclosing structure? You're apparentl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #41035|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80179
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80102
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80112
Roman Zhuykov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhroma at ispras dot ru
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #46 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #45)
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #32)
> > So you need to place may-alias at a point to make the following
> > stmt safe:
> >
> > > c = *p;
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80179
Bug ID: 80179
Summary: ICE initializing a static local object with flexible
array member in verify_ctor_sanity, at
cp/constexpr.c:2641
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79904
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 24 21:43:08 2017
New Revision: 246468
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246468&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/79904
* gcc.dg/ubsan/pr79904-2.c: Add -Wno-ps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #45 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #32)
> So you need to place may-alias at a point to make the following
> stmt safe:
>
> > c = *p;
>
> which means placing it on B, not only on the union (p i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80055
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Frederic Marchal from comment #2)
> I suggest instead that internal messages be identified as such. Some other
> messages begin with "Internal error". I would favor that solution for
> messages n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358
--- Comment #13 from Ben Woodard ---
This adds some additional complexity to a feature request in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19949. It would be helpful it
were resolved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80176
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41809
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54032
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80168
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|accepts-invalid |
--- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor ---
Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #44 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 41048
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41048&action=edit
trial patch
Does this fix the issue? I don't have an ARM setup handy for testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80102
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79776
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
The second time insert_vi_for_tree is called on the same decl, it is
from is from associate_varinfo_to_alias (itself called from
call_for_symbol_thunks_and_aliases), which is looking at a
(speculatively) inli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66639
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80161
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jeff Hammond from comment #5)
> Thanks for the comments. Indeed, I made all the changes to the containing
> project to compile in C++ and the problem went away. I will likely just
> switch to t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66477
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80161
--- Comment #5 from Jeff Hammond ---
Thanks for the comments. Indeed, I made all the changes to the containing
project to compile in C++ and the problem went away. I will likely just switch
to the preprocessor solution for now.
For posterity,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78836
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80148
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Mar 24 18:47:38 2017
New Revision: 246467
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246467&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-24 Vladimir Makarov
PR target/80148
* lr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78308
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #43 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Would something like this also work?
union function_buffer
{
[...]
mutable char data;
function_buffer() {}
function_buffer(const function_buffer &other)
{
__builtin_memcpy(t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306
--- Comment #34 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So, could we in SCCVN recognize similarly to maybe_optimize_range_tests
inter-bb && and || tests at the end stored through PHI into an SSA_NAME without
side-effects in between and handle it (hash it and comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
--- Comment #19 from Michael Meissner ---
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 09:00:37PM +, brenohl at br dot ibm.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
>
> --- Comment #16 from Breno Leitao ---
> If it helps, the problem is re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80178
Bug ID: 80178
Summary: Class with implicitly deleted copy and move
constructors usees wrong argument passing ABI
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80177
Bug ID: 80177
Summary: wrong fixit hint for misspelled static_assert:
__cpp_static_assert
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #42 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> Seems to be
>
> void move_assign(function10& f)
> {
> if (&f == this)
> return;
>
> { try {
> if (!f.empty()) {
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78732
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78836
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80174
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80153
--- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-19 failed, the ivopt dump before change is:
[15.00%]:
goto ; [100.00%]
[85.00%]:
_1 = (sizetype) element_8(D);
_2 = -_1;
_12 = (unsigned long) element_8(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54032
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80176
Bug ID: 80176
Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] cannot bind reference to static
member function using object access expression
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #41 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #38)
> Simplified testcase for discussion (is not "miscompiled"):
>
> struct S {
> union { int i; } u;
> };
>
> int main()
> {
> S s;
> new (&s.u.i) float (2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80175
Bug ID: 80175
Summary: rs6000 target should have a strlensi pattern that
works for recent powerpc processors
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41809
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meisenmann.lba@fh-salzburg.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79918
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80168
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80168
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I'm not sure this is valid given 'a' is global.
It is valid, VLA size is just an integral expression, and a is a valid
expression. The size is computed at the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80172
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't think this is valid code, that's not how std::initializer_list works.
It's not a magic array that owns its contents, it's just a pointer to some
external array and a length. In your functions the ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80168
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80174
Bug ID: 80174
Summary: [meta-bug] Fortran lto issues
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66639
D changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dragondreamer at live dot com
--- Comment #8 from D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80165
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78881
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Another issue:
In the case with file I/O if the child procedure consumes the EOR character,
upon return, the parent is also wanting to complete the EOR the check for EOR
and hits EOF.
Lets see what I get f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80166
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://reviews.llvm.org/D3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80112
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE in |[5/6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77339
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 24 14:40:13 2017
New Revision: 246462
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246462&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/77339 - ICE with invalid use of alias template.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #40 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Yikes, I need an assignement operator:
B(const B &o)
{
__builtin_memcpy(this, &o, sizeof(B));
}
B& operator = (const B &o)
{
__builtin_memcpy(this, &o, sizeof(B));
return *this;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80171
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 41046
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41046&action=edit
Somewhat reduced testcase
I've attached a testcase that is accepted by clang. GCC ICEs without
-fpermissi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #39 from Bernd Edlinger ---
one thing I do not understand is this:
if I do this in Jakub's test case:
new (b.u.b) A (x);
//c = *p;
__builtin_memcpy(&c, p, sizeof(B));
bar (*p, c);
the mis-compilation goes away,
if I add thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80119
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80119
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Mar 24 14:22:01 2017
New Revision: 246461
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246461&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/80119
* cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold): Strip CLEANUP_P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79918
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80173
Bug ID: 80173
Summary: ICE in store_bit_field_1, at expmed.c:787
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80023
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79904
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Mar 24 13:52:30 2017
New Revision: 246443
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246443&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: PR79904: Disallow reg + sym_ref literal pool addresses.
We acc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79893
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri Mar 24 13:51:32 2017
New Revision: 246442
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246442&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
S/390: PR79893: Add diagnostics vec_load_bndry builtin.
The boundary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #38 from Richard Biener ---
Simplified testcase for discussion (is not "miscompiled"):
struct S {
union { int i; } u;
};
int main()
{
S s;
new (&s.u.i) float (2.0);
S q = s;
if (*reinterpret_cast(&q.u.i) != 2.0)
abort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80112
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 24 13:37:01 2017
New Revision: 246441
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246441&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/80112
* loop-doloop.c (doloop_conditio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #37 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017, jason at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
>
> --- Comment #36 from Jason Merrill ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79776
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79671
--- Comment #36 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #34)
> C++14 12.8/16 says
>
> "The implicitly-defined copy/move constructor for a union X copies the
> object representation (3.9) of X."
>
> 3.9/4 says
>
> "The o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80160
--- Comment #6 from Arnd Bergmann ---
I've run into a four other files in the kernel sources that show this bug. I've
confirmed that the patch in comment 4 addresses all of them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80163
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 41045
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41045&action=edit
gcc7-pr80163-2.patch
Untested patch to reject the sign-extension to int128.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80172
Bug ID: 80172
Summary: Segfault when using a constructed intializer list of
tuple(int, variant) created through template pack
expansion
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 24 12:34:19 2017
New Revision: 246439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-24 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-optimization/80158
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80158
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80166
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Another problem is that for a negative number, returned value is -1 (error).
And thus libsanitizer crashes:
==7910==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: negative-size-param: (size=-4)
#0 0x7ff25bcd6a00 in __intercept
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80167
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80167
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Mar 24 12:16:43 2017
New Revision: 246438
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246438&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-24 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/80167
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80171
--- Comment #6 from Deniz Bahadir ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
>
> Simple fix (further reduced testcase appreciated)
CReduce originally created a radically reduced test-case which however was no
valid C++ anymore. (My check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80163
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Clang rejects the test-case written in C:
>
> clang pr80163.c -c
> pr80163.c:9:25: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant
> static __int128_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80171
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Deniz Bahadir from comment #4)
> Created attachment 41043 [details]
> Non-reduced test-case which fails with -O2 and -O3.
Thanks. This is good enough. I will try to reduce it further, but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80171
--- Comment #4 from Deniz Bahadir ---
Created attachment 41043
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41043&action=edit
Non-reduced test-case which fails with -O2 and -O3.
This was the original test-case which did not fail with "-O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80166
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80163
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Clang rejects the test-case written in C:
clang pr80163.c -c
pr80163.c:9:25: error: initializer element is not a compile-time constant
static __int128_t d = (long) &&a - (long) &&b;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80163
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80171
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80168
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80171
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80122
--- Comment #8 from rpirrera at aitek dot it ---
OK we have applied the patch onto the 5.4.0 version of GCC and it is working
correctly.
Thank you for your support!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80171
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
