https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181
--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao ---
Some clang-5.0 warning case:
~~~
Wstring-plus-int.c:20:24: warning: adding 'int' to a string does not append to
the string [-Wstring-plus-int]
const char *a = "aa" + 'a'; /* { dg-warning "does not append" } */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ryxi at stu dot xidian.edu.cn
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79771
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79771
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Mar 15 05:01:23 2017
New Revision: 246152
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246152&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-15 Yaakov Selkowitz
PR bootstrap/79771
* gzguts.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79800
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79800
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Mar 15 04:31:27 2017
New Revision: 246151
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246151&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/79800
* gimple-ssa-sprintf.c (format_f
>
> Regression tested for GNU Fortran (GCC) 7.0.1 20170314 (experimental) on
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no regressions.
This falls into the PITA classification. Also known as simple enough,
regression test and commit. (consider it approved)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61837
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62147
--- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Still happens.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62233
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65643
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80001
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80016
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch for bogus *starting* location:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg00797.html
(this doesn't fix the bogus finish location)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80014
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg00796.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79852
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79860
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79947
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Mar 15 00:25:10 2017
New Revision: 246150
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246150&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-03-14 Michael Meissner
PR target/79947
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80035
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3)
> ptxas gets confused around loops lacking
> exit edges (and perhaps other "unusual" CFG structures). They can easily
> appear even in original source and do not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80035
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2)
> Replacing trap with exit or ret (or adding it after trap), makes the sigsegv
> go away.
This problem goes away for ptxas -ori starting cuda 7.0.
fix it.
Regression tested for GNU Fortran (GCC) 7.0.1 20170314 (experimental) on
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no regressions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80044
Bug ID: 80044
Summary: Specifying both -static and -pie insanity
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79447
Damian Rouson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79936
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79753
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79988
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71399
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79096
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79393
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Target Mileston
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80036
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
De
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80025
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79659
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67146
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79831
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80043
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80020
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80020
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Mar 14 22:16:27 2017
New Revision: 246145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246145&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/80020
* builtin-attrs.def (ATTR_ALLOC_SIZE_2_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79936
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #9 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79936
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Mar 14 22:09:40 2017
New Revision: 246144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246144&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/79936
* Makefile.in (GTFILES): Add calls.c.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78870
--- Comment #10 from niXman ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> There's a patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2017-02/msg00041.html
>
> I haven't reviewed or tested it yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg007
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79947
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 40976
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40976&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
The tARGET_RSQRTES macro needed a guard to require -mpowerpc-gfxopt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80041
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239
Nicolas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40964|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79947
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
The problem is the -mno-powerpc-gfxopt option disables floating point
conditional moves, which is needed to use the floating point reciprocal
estimate instructions.
The macro TARGET_FRSQRTES did not have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79947
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80042
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most likely because gcc assumes sin ( Inf); is a full constant so it can remove
the load after it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79951
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80043
Bug ID: 80043
Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE with pointer-to-member-function
and -fpermissive
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-vali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80042
Bug ID: 80042
Summary: gcc thinks sin/cos don't set errno
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79728
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79728
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Mar 14 17:50:46 2017
New Revision: 246138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246138&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/79728
* regs.h (struct target_regs): Ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79949
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
It's unfortunate and directly related to the maintenance effort involved.
The deprecation plan for Cilk+ would have code in gcc-7, but the code would be
removed prior to the gcc-8 release. Unless someone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80041
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80041
Bug ID: 80041
Summary: std::codecvt_utf16 converts to UTF-8 not
UTF-16
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80014
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Root cause is that we aren't setting locations for typeid() expressions. I'm
working on a fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038
--- Comment #7 from Florent Hivert ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #6)
> Also note it is likely Cilk+ will be deprecated in gcc-7
That's a huge pity from my point of view. For recursive exploration like the
code I put here, I don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80029
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80027
--- Comment #3 from Michael Thayer ---
Seems my mistake. I think the ASAN library was still getting loaded
dynamically. Now I have the following problem, which I think means that code
(constructors?) getting called before ASAN is initialised is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79865
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79900
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79687
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79962
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79984
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80040
Bug ID: 80040
Summary: SSE4.1 ptest not always merged
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79908
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Any fix for this must also handle this reduced test case:
typedef __builtin_va_list __gnuc_va_list;
typedef __gnuc_va_list va_list;
void
foo (va_list args)
{
va_list ap;
__builtin_va_copy (ap, args);
(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80040
--- Comment #2 from Allan Jensen ---
Created attachment 40973
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40973&action=edit
Assembler output from gcc 6
Easier to compare
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636
--- Comment #27 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 14 16:03:10 2017
New Revision: 246134
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79264
* lambda.c (maybe_generic_this_capture):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79264
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 14 16:03:10 2017
New Revision: 246134
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246134&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79264
* lambda.c (maybe_generic_this_capture): D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80040
--- Comment #1 from Allan Jensen ---
Created attachment 40972
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40972&action=edit
Assembler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79687
--- Comment #24 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 14 15:58:39 2017
New Revision: 246133
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246133&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79687
* init.c (constant_value_1): Break if the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79900
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 14 15:55:53 2017
New Revision: 246132
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246132&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79900 - ICE in strip_typedefs
* tree.c (strip_ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79984
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 14 15:53:23 2017
New Revision: 246131
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246131&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79962
PR c++/79984
* c-common.c (handle_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79962
--- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Mar 14 15:53:23 2017
New Revision: 246131
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246131&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79962
PR c++/79984
* c-common.c (handle_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79831
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71838
--- Comment #15 from Anton Shterenlikht ---
Yes, the problem seems to have been solved.
My code compiles fine now.
Thanks
Anton
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80014
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
The issue is that we have a range where caret == start, at the given location,
but where finish == UNKNOWN_LOCATION, for some reason, and so this clause fires
in diagnostic-show-locus.c:layout::layout:
797
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80038
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Block
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79831
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 14 15:31:53 2017
New Revision: 246129
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246129&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Document -Wchkp (PR middle-end/79831).
2017-03-14 Martin Liska
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80035
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80014
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68421
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
--- Comment #7 from Denis Khalikov ---
Thomas, before verifying i should fix issues from the list,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-03/msg00735.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79162
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Mar 14 14:51:19 2017
New Revision: 246128
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246128&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/79162 disambiguate assignment from string_view
PR l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79831
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79752
--- Comment #5 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: acsawdey
Date: Tue Mar 14 14:43:03 2017
New Revision: 246127
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246127&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
This showed up in power9 code for __divkf3 software float
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79393
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Author: nathan
Date: Tue Mar 14 14:41:53 2017
New Revision: 246126
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246126&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79393 DR 1658 workaround
* method.c (synthesized_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79908
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Patch isn't acceptable; still investigating.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79255
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79255
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
Last reconfirmed|2017-01-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77631
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79728
--- Comment #6 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #5)
> So please ignore my mumble...
Still seems broken to me.
If one of the patches could be put into gcc trunk, that might help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79820
--- Comment #6 from niXman ---
Created attachment 40970
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40970&action=edit
patch
done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79763
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79820
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Sorry, I was looking at gcc-6-branch which sets errno=0 in close(), but I
removed that on trunk for PR 65411.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79659
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008
--- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw ---
(In reply to Marc Mutz from comment #5)
> Why is this only "missed-optimization"? Don't these architecture's ABIs
> stipulate passing in registers, as well as the Itanium ABI? So why is this
> not a platfo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60970
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79576
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 14 12:57:08 2017
New Revision: 246122
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246122&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-14 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
20
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
