https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79932
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69034
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
FYI: The latest version of my patch is here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01363.html
Unfortunately there was no consensus about it ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79897
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79897
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 7 06:11:14 2017
New Revision: 245945
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245945&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/79897
* ubsan.c (ubsan_encode_value): Call ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79927
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79862
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79933
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79933
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79862
--- Comment #6 from Sumit ---
Hi Andrew,
Somehow these files were missing in my package. I have recopied them back and
things have moved further.
Now, I am seeing compilation error at :
../../../../../gcc-4.8/libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/debug.cc -o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79936
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
Created attachment 40903
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40903&action=edit
preprocessed source
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> >Interestingly, the ICE seems to go away when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79936
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
>Interestingly, the ICE seems to go away when I try to save the preprocessed
>source to attach to this bug:
That usually might point to a GC issue. still attach the preprocessed source
and we can try to se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79936
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
Can you create a translation unit by saving the output of the -E option and
attach it? From the stack trace in attachment 40902 it looks like the abort is
in the diagnostic code (diagnostic_impl) and so not v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79912
--- Comment #4 from Kito Cheng ---
Hi Eric:
>> vfscanf.c: In function ‘_IO_vfscanf_internal’:
>> vfscanf.c:3050:1: error: unable to generate reloads for:
>> (insn 11026 11523 5651 1080 (set (reg:QI 3515)
>> (mem/c:QI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 65
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69034
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79936
Bug ID: 79936
Summary: ICE with -Walloc-size-larger-than=32767
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79935
Bug ID: 79935
Summary: DJGPP: misaligned stack in static constructors
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79934
Bug ID: 79934
Summary: Vectorization of descending-index loops can produce
unnecessary permutes
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79933
Bug ID: 79933
Summary: gfortran no longer able to compile dolfyn benchmark
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79930
--- Comment #8 from Adam Hirst ---
Ah, it seems that Jerry was tinkering with tp_array.f90 (intrinsic array
version of the Vector type), while I was with tp_xyz.f90 (explicit separate
elements). I was going to remark at how he didn't need to use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79930
--- Comment #7 from Adam Hirst ---
OK, I tried a little harder, and was able to get a performance increase.
type(Vect3D) pure function TP_LEFT(NU, D, NV) result(tensorproduct)
real(dp), intent(in) :: NU(4), NV(4)
type(Vect3D), inte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79932
Bug ID: 79932
Summary: _mm512_packus_epi32 does not compile under -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79930
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Thanks Thomas, somehow I thought we would have built the temporary to do this.
(Well actully we do, but after the frontend passes)
Now we get:
$ gfc -O2 tp_array.f90
$ time ./a.out
This code variant uses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79930
--- Comment #5 from Adam Hirst ---
Hmm, even with -Ofast, I don't get any noticeable performance increase if I
change, say, TP_LEFT, to be:
type(Vect3D) pure function TP_LEFT(NU, D, NV) result(tensorproduct)
real(dp), intent(in) :: NU(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71543
Jeff Trull changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jetrull at sbcglobal dot net
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79886
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Perhaps Fortran FE formatters can call the standard formatters if an
unknown directive is found? I don't know how C/C++ handles this case (does
it support this %-directive or does it switch to the stand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79918
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79931
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The assert:
gcc_assert (targets.length () <= len);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79931
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Related to PR 66301 but not exactly the same.
here is the full testcase:
cc1plus: internal compiler error: in dump_possible_polymorphic_call_targets, at
ipa-devirt.c:3361
0xb6b53b dump_possible_polymorphic_ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77850
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Fixed by following commits on hppa64-*-*:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2017-03/msg00134.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2017-03/msg00136.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2017-03/msg00137.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79930
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Currently, we only inline statements of the form
a = matmul(b,c)
so the more complex expressions in your code are not
inlined (and thus slow). This is a known limitation,
which will not be fixed in time fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79858
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79885
Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|fix-includes does not honor |--with-build-sysroot= does
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 6 22:51:23 2017
New Revision: 245932
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245932&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79821
* dwarf2out.h (dw_vec_const): Change array t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79931
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79439
--- Comment #11 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Mar 6 22:47:03 2017
New Revision: 245930
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245930&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2017-03-06 Michael Meissner
Back port from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28254
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79931
Bug ID: 79931
Summary: ICE in dump_possible_polymorphic_call_targets with
-fdump-ipa-all -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79876
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Le 6 mars 2017 à 16:55, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
> a écrit :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79876
>
> --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
> On my Linux system, I can get a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929
--- Comment #1 from Harald Anlauf ---
Possibly related to PR78758, which is already fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79930
--- Comment #3 from Adam Hirst ---
Created attachment 40898
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40898&action=edit
Implementation using dimension(3) member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79930
--- Comment #2 from Adam Hirst ---
Created attachment 40897
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40897&action=edit
Implementation using %x %y and %z members
Will post the source code here as attachments.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79886
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79930
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79930
Bug ID: 79930
Summary: Potentially Missed Optimisation for MATMUL /
DOT_PRODUCT
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79897
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79929
Bug ID: 79929
Summary: [7 Regression] Bogus Warning: '__builtin_memset':
specified size 4294967291 exceeds maximum object size
2147483647
Product: gcc
Version: 7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79916
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Sorry, I can not reproduce the bug. I built a cross-compiler configured as
--target=ppc64le-linux-gnu on today trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79928
Bug ID: 79928
Summary: nds32: misspelled diagnostic: not support -fpic
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79927
Bug ID: 79927
Summary: 5.4.0: exponential notation triggers bogus "variably
modified" warning
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79907
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
--- Comment #16 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Mar 6 20:23:00 2017
New Revision: 245928
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245928&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-06 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/79571
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79926
Bug ID: 79926
Summary: i386: untranslated placeholder "exception/interrupt"
in diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79925
Bug ID: 79925
Summary: aarch64: misplaced quote in diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79924
Bug ID: 79924
Summary: aarch64: untranslated diagnostics in
aarch64_err_no_fpadvsimd
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79923
Bug ID: 79923
Summary: diagnostics: some diagnostics have trailing period
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79922
Bug ID: 79922
Summary: i18n: unnecessary plural form translation in "passing
argument %d"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79921
Bug ID: 79921
Summary: missing translation for "...this statement, but the
latter is misleadingly indented"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79904
--- Comment #3 from Dominik Vogt ---
Not sure what that means:
When UBSAN_CHECK_MUL is expanded, the generated Rtl wants the vector constant
"3" in the litaral pool (insn 30):
--
;; _2 = UBSAN_CHECK_MUL (_1, { 11, 22, 33, 44, 0, 0, 0, 0 });
(in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79904
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79904
--- Comment #2 from Dominik Vogt ---
Reduced test:
--
typedef signed char V __attribute__((vector_size (8)));
void foo (V *a)
{
*a = *a * 3;
}
--
$ gcc -fsanitize=undefined ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79796
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79796
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Mar 6 17:38:42 2017
New Revision: 245927
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245927&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79796 - ICE with NSDMI and this pointer
* call.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69143
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79915
--- Comment #1 from Jan Smets ---
Sorry, copy/pasted incorrect libtool compile, it's the one of
libstdc++-v3/src/c++98/strstream.cc
Also, occurs at any optimisation level.
libtool: compile: /jasmets/git/tools/toolchains/gcc6/gcc-builddir/./gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79912
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79897
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Another observation: doesn't ICE with -fsigned-char.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79857
--- Comment #3 from Roland Illig ---
Assuming that the diagnostics containing words like "edge" or "BB" are
presented to the GCC user, how are they going to make any use of them?
Or "cgraph_node has wrong clone_of"? As a programmer, I have no id
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79897
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
-fsanitize=enum is enough.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79905
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79858
--- Comment #2 from Roland Illig ---
What about the letters "mode"? Are they to be translated? Or should the
resulting text, even in Arabic, be "QImode"?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79920
Bug ID: 79920
Summary: Incorrect floating point results when compiling with
-O3
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79897
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79793
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79793
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Mar 6 16:08:59 2017
New Revision: 245926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245926&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Set incoming stack boundary to 128 for 64-bit targets
For 64-bit t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79876
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
On my Linux system, I can get a crash with
OMP_STACKSIZE=500k ./a.out
and successfull execution with
OMP_STACKSIZE=1M ./a.out
What happens if you try these commands?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79919
Bug ID: 79919
Summary: Warning specifiedsend of method instead of correct
line
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79822
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 6 15:43:51 2017
New Revision: 245925
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245925&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/79822
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_statement_list): Trea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71437
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Converting the VRP threading into a domwalk with the appropriate callbacks is
trivial. It's a nice side benefit from some 2016 work.
Probably the biggest driver for the gcc-7 vs gcc-8 decision will be whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79821
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
[...]
>> I can also run a full bootstrap if that's helpful.
>
> If you can, it is useful. I'll do a x86_64/i686-linux bootstrap as well later
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79918
Bug ID: 79918
Summary: Feature request: Warning about (may potential)
misaligned address-reference
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: dia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79900
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79901
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
On the middle-end side, I see dom3 changing:
- vect_patt_1.22_94 = VEC_COND_EXPR ;
- vect_patt_1.22_95 = VEC_COND_EXPR ;
+ vect_patt_1.22_94 = MIN_EXPR ;
+ vect_patt_1.22_95 = MIN_EXPR ;
without actually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79917
Bug ID: 79917
Summary: Internal compiler error with variadic template and
concepts, internal compiler error: in
tsubst_constraint, at cp/constraint.cc:1956
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
--- Comment #15 from Vladimir Makarov ---
My approach is to fix it in LRA by using a reload pass behaviour.
We have
(define_insn "*movti_internal"
[(set (match_operand:TI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=!r ,o ,v,v ,v ,m")
(match_operand:T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #13)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11)
> > I see a similar test-case on ppc64le-linux-gnu (w/ cross-compiler):
> >
> > $ ppc64le-linux-gnu-g++
> > /home/ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79916
Bug ID: 79916
Summary: ICE in Max. number of generated reload insns per insn
is achieved (90)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
--- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11)
> I see a similar test-case on ppc64le-linux-gnu (w/ cross-compiler):
>
> $ ppc64le-linux-gnu-g++
> /home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/compat/decim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79901
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78543
--- Comment #12 from Matthias Klose ---
still reproducible with r245899 on the gcc-6-branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79571
--- Comment #12 from Bernd Schmidt ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Wouldn't it penalize other code? E.g. if you have a TImode MEM and store
> from something in XMM register, then it doesn't have to be offsetable and
> can use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79894
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 6 13:58:57 2017
New Revision: 245923
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245923&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-06 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79894
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79887
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79894
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79824
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Mar 6 13:58:01 2017
New Revision: 245922
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245922&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-06 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/79824
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79893
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79405
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|bernds at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
