https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79867
Bug ID: 79867
Summary: [cygwin] LD_LIBRARY_PATH ignored, contaminating
(nearly?) all test results
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79830
--- Comment #4 from Petr ---
I think the test-case can be simplified to the following code. It still suffers
from the same issues as mentioned above.
#include
#if defined(_MSC_VER)
# include
#else
# include
#endif
void transform(double* dst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79814
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
>Well, the C++ frontend inserts CLOBBERs at the beginning of constructors so
>either this zeroing is pointless (and likely optimized out) or the frontend
>produces wrong-code in doing so.
It is pointless.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77850
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
We currently use genetic code in hppa_gimplify_va_arg_expr:
static tree
hppa_gimplify_va_arg_expr (tree valist, tree type, gimple_seq *pre_p,
gimple_seq *post_p)
{
if (TARGET
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77850
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-*-* |powerpc-*-* hppa64-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79866
Bug ID: 79866
Summary: diagnostics: typo in "Variable %s at %L of type
EVENT_TYPE"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77546
PeteVine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78994
--- Comment #7 from PeteVine ---
Not affected by -mno-fix-cortex-a53-843419 which gives the issue full validity.
-Ofast pessimizes Cortex A53 codegen somehow and switching to e.g.
-mcpu=cortex-a57 fixes it. (tested on trunk)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468
--- Comment #31 from PeteVine ---
Indeed, that was it! I've probably found the source of my A53 issues:
http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1703040-RI-CRAYERRAT99
This means comment #29 exposes a different issue and Cortex A53 codegen still
is s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79202
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Can't this just use a friz? If the cast to int wouldn't fit in
an int it is undefined behaviour.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79865
Bug ID: 79865
Summary: Crash when calling member function with template
parameter from generic lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 6.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79233
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79251
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Perhaps something like: (copy word 1 in vB to word rB in vT; BE)
sldi rB,rB,2
lvsl vP,0,rB
vperm vT,vT,vT,vP
xxinsertw vT,vB,0
lvsr vP,0,rB
vperm vT,vT,vT,vP
(i.e. rotate the dest vector so that the de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79395
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79864
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Depends on|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79864
Bug ID: 79864
Summary: Impl
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79863
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79863
Bug ID: 79863
Summary: Assignment of unallocated array to unallocated array
variable leads to access of unallocated memory
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79862
Bug ID: 79862
Summary: Compilation error while building libstdc++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468
--- Comment #30 from PeteVine ---
Or rather, the difference observed in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468#c7
is still there @ -Ofast, but the Cortex-A53 result is in the same range now.
I'll have to investigate the effect of -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77468
--- Comment #29 from PeteVine ---
I used a different distribution image (binutils 2.25, no
--fix-cortex-a53-835769 option) but the results haven't changed (thunderx
tuning must have improved though as it stopped offering any benefit over A53):
h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79861
Bug ID: 79861
Summary: i18n: add translator comment for "%s !$ACC LOOP loops
not perfectly nested at %L"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79844
--- Comment #1 from Roland Illig ---
Same issue, in fortran/match.c:
gfc_error ("Redundant STAT tag found at %L ", &tmp->where);
gfc_error ("Redundant ERRMSG tag found at %L ", &tmp->where);
gfc_error ("Redundant UNTIL_COUNT tag found at %L ",
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66205
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.1.0
--- Comment #8 from sim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79814
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On March 4, 2017 12:30:21 AM GMT+01:00, "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79814
>
>--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
>The code in question is:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79860
Bug ID: 79860
Summary: i18n: single-word translation in "Character-valued %s
%qs"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79859
Bug ID: 79859
Summary: diagnostics: argument quoted twice in "No initializer
for allocatable compoonent"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61984
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79858
Bug ID: 79858
Summary: Explain to translators what %smode means
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56906
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56606
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79857
Bug ID: 79857
Summary: cgraph_node::verify_node should call internal_error
instead of error
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79856
Bug ID: 79856
Summary: rtl_verify_edges: use internal_error instead of error
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79855
Bug ID: 79855
Summary: params.def: missing period in
PARAM_MAX_STORES_TO_MERGE
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54168
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm, powerpc*-*-* |arm
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79854
Bug ID: 79854
Summary: diagnostics: gfc_conv_constant_to_tree should be
gfc_internal_error
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79847
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79847
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Sat Mar 4 11:04:50 2017
New Revision: 245893
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=245893&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/79847
* c-decl.c (implicit_decl_warning): Add miss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79853
Bug ID: 79853
Summary: diagnostics: double space in "Assumed or deferred"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79852
Bug ID: 79852
Summary: diagnostics should not end with exclamation mark
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79851
Bug ID: 79851
Summary: diagnostics: replace '%s' with %qs in all diagnostics
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79850
Bug ID: 79850
Summary: diagnostics: typo in "fields has different layout"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79849
Bug ID: 79849
Summary: diagnostics: typo in "type %qT itself violate the C++
One Definition Rule"
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79848
Bug ID: 79848
Summary: diagnostics: too complicated %<%s%>
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79813
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79847
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79841
--- Comment #6 from Roland Illig ---
Could you perhaps make all 6 messages in that function follow the same syntax?
47 matches
Mail list logo